Are You Better at Access Control than ADI?

By: Brian Rhodes, Published on Mar 07, 2014

There are many methods of controlling access, but not all are worth recommending. When it comes to asking for help, ADI has plenty of advice. But how good are those designs? Do they have your best interest, or their suppliers, in mind when handing out solutions?

We take a look at one simple access example in the note that follows.

The Design Problem

National distributor ADI issues 'price specials' every month. This month they are featuring products from access hardware maker SDC. Catch this video:

Behind an unrealistic mock phonecall between an installer and SDC/ADI phone operators lie an interesting and common access design problem.

***** *** **** ******* of *********** ******, *** not *** *** ***** recommending. **** ** ***** to ****** *** ****, ADI *** ****** ** advice. *** *** **** are ***** *******? ** they **** **** **** interest, ** ***** *********, in **** **** ******* out *********?

** **** * **** at *** ****** ****** example ** *** **** that *******.

The ****** *******

******** *********** *** ****** 'price ********' ***** *****. This ***** **** *** featuring ******** **** ****** hardware ***** ***. ***** **** video:

****** ** *********** **** phonecall ******* ** ********* and ***/*** ***** ********* lie an *********** *** ****** access ****** *******.

[***************]

** ** **** ** gather **** *** *****:

  • ****: ******* ******* (******** Access) ******* * ***** door
  • ******* ****: **** ****, Metal *****, ******** ******* *******
  • ******** ****: *********** ****
  • **** ****** ******** (**: Can ****** **** **** secured ****)
  • ******** **** **** ****** Unlock **** * ****** Receptionist's ****
  • ****** ****: *** ****** Access
  • ****** ****: "*** ******** doesn't **** ** ***** a *** ** *****" meaning: *** **** *********, the ******.
  • **********: ** ******** *********** hardware ** ** ***** or ****** ** ********* with.
  • ** ***'* **** *** benefit ** ******* ***** time (*** **** *** door *****/******) *** ***'* assume * ********** **** door ** * - 10 ****** *** ****.

The **************

*** ********** ******** ****** this ******:

**** *********** ** *********, ** never ** ********* ** this **. ** **** ahead *** ******* **** solution **** ***, *** it ****** *** **** this:


****: **** ******* ******** a ~**% ****** ** equipment *** * $**/** labor **** ** ** estimated * ***-***** *** installation. **** ************ ******** could ************* **** ***** on *** ******** ** the **** *** *** skill ** *** *********. 

*** ***** ******** **** installed ***** ** **** under $****.

Seriously *********

*** **** **** ** this ******** ******* ****** the *** ** ********.*********** ***** ** **** applications, *** **** *** relatively *********. ** ***** to ****** **********,******** *** ******* ****** ** **** *** might ** ******** ** law. *** **** **** these ***** ********** (*** PIR & **********) ** purchased, *** ****** *** installed. **** ***** ******** ** ******* **** ****** power ** *******, * separate ***** ****** **** be ********* *** **** in ** **** ******* distribution.

** *** ******** *** a **** ***** ******, the*********** ** ********** ** drop ***** **** *** alarm ** *********, ********* in ********** *********** ******** and ******* **** ** audit ** *** *** to ******* **** ********. None ** ***** *****, nor *** ***** ** multiple ***** ** ********** added ** *** *****, but ** ** * common ******* **** *****************.

*** **** ** **** solution ** ****** ** the **** ******* ****** to **** ** ****. While *** ********** ** the ***** ********** ** is ******* *** ** easy ** *******, ***** solution **** ** **** will **** ***** ** hang *** *** ******** legally. *** ******* *****!

A ****** ***

******** ******** ********** *** competing *** **** ***, a ******** **** ***** fit *** ** *** above *********** *** **** out *** **** **** $850 ** **** ** furnish. *** **** ******** uses *** **** ******* and **** $**/** ***** rate. ** **** ***** be ********* **** ***. We ****** *** ******** there ***** * ***** phonecall:

***** *** **** *******, the **** ** *****-**** ********** ****** ****** ***** ~$***, *** ** installed ** * **** hour (**** ****** ** charged * ***** ****) by * ****** ********* in ******** **** *****, and ** **** ***** in $** *** *** batteries.  ***** *****: $***, and ** **** ********** the *** ******** ********, without ********** ********* ******, and ** **** ****** to *******.

*********, **** *** ** not **** ****** *** kill ***. *** ***** this ** *** **** the **** ******** *** there. 

Can *** ** ******?

Comments (7)

Let me see what the next monthly issue of [SECURITY MAG] tells me and I'll get back to you in mid-April.

If this is a low-demand application, there are consumer options that are pretty cheap:

For about the same price as the original ADI solution, the customer could likely get a more advanced lock, which would give them some amount of access-card options and audit trails:

(note the RF remote pushbutton looks like it's an additional $65, but these are also retail prices).

You left out the cost of having the fire alarm provider back to add a device to connect your mag lock based system to the alarm system which is required by every AHJ I have ever dealt with......and not required by your Trilogy based system.

As you, Brian, I would like to find a less expensive, dependable single door system than what you proposed but so far, I have not.

Hello Mike:

I mentioned it, but could not count it as a hard cost not knowing whether or not there is a fire alarm to begin with. But in real costs, it adds $30 - $200 to the job just in overhead. (additional gas, non-productive time, phonecalls, trip charges for the fire tech, etc)

You're likely looking at multiple trips to the site if using a maglock... even just one, on one door. Yikes!

Why do they need both an RTE motion AND a pushbutton? They're doing the same job, yeah it's a relatively small amount of money, but you only need one of those devices...

In most jurisdictions, you need two RTE devices if the door is an egress door.

Why? If smoke from a fire obscures a PIR, how do you unlock it?

This scenario is why 2 forms of RTE are required by IBC. Here's the code below:

1008.1.4.4 Access-Controlled Egress Doors

  • A sensor must be mounted on the egress side to detect an occupant approaching the doors. Doors must unlock upon a signal from the sensor or loss of power to the sensor.
  • A manual unlocking device (push button) shall result in direct interruption of power to the lock – independent of the access control system electronics. When the push button is actuated, the doors must remain unlocked for 30 seconds minimum. The push button must include signage stating “Push to Exit” and must be located 40” to 48” vertically above the floor and within 5’ of the doors. Ready access must be provided to the push button.

You might get away with only a pushbutton in some jurisdictions, but never just a PIR. Too risky. The PIR is there for convenience during normal operation, so the door 'automatically' unlocks without requiring people to push a button first.

In some state the Remote Relaese has to be a hard wire connection. You would also have a hard time doing this type of intallation in a elevator lobby because of all of the fire codes.

If you have to call your ADI or SDC sales guy to figure out what to use for this door, then you probably shouldn't be licensed to do the work in the first place. This is a prime example of the traditional ADI customer profile, and a great example of why we don't fit in with their sales model.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Fingerprints for Access Control Guide on Sep 09, 2019
Users can lose badges, but they never misplace a finger, right? The most common biometric used in access are fingerprints, and it has become one...
Assa Acquires LifeSafety Power on Sep 04, 2019
Assa Abloy is acquiring LifeSafety Power, adding to their growing collection of access control brands like Mercury, August, Pioneer Doors, and...
Mobile Access Control Guide on Aug 28, 2019
One of the biggest trends in access for the last few years has been the marriage of mobile phones and access cards. But how does this...
ZK Teco Atlas Access Control Tested on Aug 20, 2019
Who needs access specialists? China-based ZKTeco claims its newest access panel 'makes it very easy for anyone to learn and install access control...
Suprema Biometric Mass Leak Examined on Aug 19, 2019
While Suprema is rarely discussed even within the physical security market, the South Korean biometrics manufacturer made global news this past...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Aug 13, 2019
Biometrics are commonly used in phones, but how frequently are they used for access? 150+ integrators told us how often they use biometrics,...
ProdataKey (PDK) Access Company Profile on Aug 09, 2019
Utah based ProdataKey touts low cost cloud access, wireless controllers, and no dealer required national distribution availability. But how does...
Axis Door Station A8207-VE Tested on Aug 07, 2019
Axis newest door station, the A8207-VE, claims to deliver "video surveillance, two-way communication, and access control" in a single device. But...
Avigilon Blue VSaaS Tested on Aug 05, 2019
Avigilon says Blue is a "powerful integrator cloud service platform", easy to set up and configure, quickly scale business, by leveraging cloud...
Mobile Access Control Shootout - Farpointe, HID, Openpath, Nortek, Proxy on Jul 29, 2019
One of the biggest rising trends in access control is using phones as credentials but which offering is best? IPVM has tested five of the...

Most Recent Industry Reports

How Cobalt Robotics May Disrupt Security on Sep 13, 2019
While security robots have largely become a joke over the last few years, one organization, Cobalt Robotics, has raised $50+ million from top US...
Panasonic 4K Camera Tested (WV-S2570L) on Sep 13, 2019
Panasonic has released their latest generation 4K dome, the WV-S2570L, claiming "Extreme image quality allows evidence to be captured even under...
ASIS GSX 2019 Show Report Final on Sep 12, 2019
IPVM went to Chicago for ASIS GSX 2019, with many exhibitors disappointed about traffic and the exhibitor schedule changing next year. Inside we...
Installation Course - Last Chance - Register Now on Sep 12, 2019
Last Chance - Register Now - September 2019 Video Surveillance Install Course. Thursday, September 12th is your last chance to register for the...
Commend ID5 Intercom Tested on Sep 12, 2019
Commend touts the new ID5 intercom as 'timelessly elegant' and the slim body, glass front touchscreen indeed looks better than common, but ugly,...
US State Department: "Chinese Tech Giants" "Tools of the Chinese Communist Party" on Sep 12, 2019
The US State Department has called out "Chinese tech giants" for being "tools of the Chinese Communist Party" in a blunt new speech that makes...
Uniview OEM Directory on Sep 11, 2019
This directory lists 20+ companies that OEM products from Uniview, with a graphic and links to company websites below. It does not cover all...
Yi Home Camera 3 AI Analytics Tested on Sep 10, 2019
Yi Technology is claiming "new AI features" in its $50 Home Camera 3 "eliminates 'false positives' caused by flying insects, small pets, or light...
Hanwha Announces 32MP Camera + AI Line on Sep 10, 2019
In the first rise in maximum megapixel resolution in 5 years, Hanwha has announced a 32MP / 8K camera directly competing with Avigilon's H4 30MP /...
Fingerprints for Access Control Guide on Sep 09, 2019
Users can lose badges, but they never misplace a finger, right? The most common biometric used in access are fingerprints, and it has become one...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact