Competing Against Surveillance Self-Install / DIY

By: John Honovich, Published on May 26, 2015

End users sometimes look at integrator proposals, see ~$100 per hour pricing and think "Hey, we can do that ourselves for a lot less."

In this note, we examine 6 key issues that end users must consider when evaluating the total cost of doing it themselves.

  • Learning Curve
  • Mistakes in Design and Configuration
  • Ongoing Support
  • Training
  • Insurance and Licenses
  • Risk protection
  • Plus we cover scheduling, tools, manufacturer constraints and more

We break down each inside, including the potential costs and impact of each one. Finally, we look at the opposite side and alternative approaches.

*** ***** ********* **** at ********** *********, ***~$*** *** **** ********** ***** "***, ** can ** **** ********* for * *** ****."

** **** ****, ** examine * *** ****** that *** ***** **** consider **** ********** *** total **** ** ***** it **********.

  • ******** *****
  • ******** ** ****** *** Configuration
  • ******* *******
  • ********
  • ********* *** ********
  • **** **********
  • **** ** ***** **********, tools, ************ *********** *** more

** ***** **** **** inside, ********* *** ********* costs *** ****** ** each ***. *******, ** look ** *** ******** side *** *********** **********.

[***************]

Learning *****

** ** *********** ********** takes *** ***** ** do ** *******, **** a ******* ******** ** IT ****** ** ***** to **** ************* ****** if **** **** *** done ************ ******** ****** or **** ****** **** the ******** ****** ** systems.

*** ****** **** ** an ********** ******** *** training, ***** *** ***** needed ** ***** *** only ************ ******** *** the ****** **** **** new *****.

Mistakes ** ****** *** *************

**** **** ****** ** ******** cameras, ** *** ** setup ***, ** ******** rules ** ******** ** the ***, ************* ****-********** are ****** ** **** a ******* ** ****** mistakes.

******* ********* *** ****** is **** ********* *************** issues **** **** ** that *** **** ***** or ****. *********, *********** integrators **** **** ** solve **** ******** ** minutes ***** ** **** experiences ** ******** *********** with ************ *******. **** when *********** **** ** spend **** ****, ** is ********* **** ** they *** **** ******* eliminate ******.

Ongoing *******

*******, **** *********** ******* support *** ******** ******* for ** ***** *** first **** ***** ************. If *** ****** **** up, *********** **** *** them ** ** ********** cost ******* ****-********* ******** incur ********** *******.

********

** * ******* ** installing **********, **** *** (or ******) **** ***** people ** ************ ********, which **** **** **** and ********* **** ** the *******.

******* *********, *** ***** will ***** **** ******* to ******** *** ***** / ********* ** *******. Integrators, **** ********* **** world ********** **** ******* and ********* *** ****** show *** ****** ********* on ******* *** **** out ** *******.

Insurance *** ********

************ *********** ***** ***** numerous ********** **** ***** a ******* ** ********* deficiencies. *** ******* '****** *** *********' (*&*) ********* **** address *** ********* *** damages, ********, ** **** poor ******* ** ** corrected.  ** ********,*** ** ******* ********* * ****** *********** of ************* ****** ******** where *** ***** **** for * ******** ******* the ******* *******, ** even ******* *** ******** ability ** *** ********** completing * ***.

** * ****** ******, specific ********** *** ************** required ** ***** *********** to *********** ********** *** fitness ** ******* **** in * ******* ********* manner.  *******, ******** ***** are *** ********** ** project **********, *** **** do ******** ** ********* of ***** **** *** regulations ** **** ******* to * *****, *** casual ** '***-**-*****' *********** often **** *** ***** awareness.

Risk **********

** ********, ********* ** integrator **** * ***** price *** ********** *** project (********* ****** '**** fixed *****' ******* *** price ** **** *** fixed ********** ** *** many ****** ** **** it ***** *** ********** to ****** *** ***). This ******** **** ********** for *** *** ****, because **** **** **** is *** *****.

** ********, ** ***-**** who **** ** ********** may ******** *** *** hours, *** ** ***** 130 ** *** ** 170 *****, *** ********** cost ** ******** ******** by ****. **** **** is **** **** *********** if *** ***-**** ***** experience **** ************ ******* or *** ******** ******** being *********.

Other *******

**** *** **** ***** factors ** ** ****:

  • ******** **** - ***'* internal ********* ***** ** paid '****' $** ** $30 ** ****, *** after ****** ** *** other ******** (****** ****, vacation, **********, ***.), ***** fully ******** **** ***** be $** ** $** per ****, ******* **** the ********* *******.
  • ********** - ** ***** be ********* ** ********** in-house ********* ** ******** time ** **** ** the ************ ******, ********** if ***** ********** ***** or ********* ***** ** be **** *******.
  • ***** - *********** ***** their *** *****, ******* it ** *** ***********, testing, ***************, ***. **** an ***-**** *** **** to ***.
  • ************ *********** - ******* manufacturers **** **** ******* support *** ***** ******** through ********* *** *****.

The **** *** ***

** *** ***** ****, there *** ********** **** can **** *** **** stronger *** ***.

**** ***********, ** *** user *** **** ** being **** ** **** someone **** **** *********** expertise. ** * ******* is *** ******, **** might ** **** ** hire **** ** *********** technician ** ******** **** an **********.

******* ****** ***** ** the ***** ** *** organization *** **** ****** and ******** ** *** a ******** *******.

*******, **** ** *** organization **** *** **** experience ** *****, **** might ** * ********** amount ** ******** ********, that **** *** *********** build ** ***** *** internal '**********', *** ***** experience ******* ** *********** integrators **** ****.

Alternative / ************ ********

**** ************* *********** ** 'part' ***, ***** **** do *** **** ***** install **** - ******** cameras, ******* *******, ******* recorders, ***. *** ***** the **** ******* **** to ** **********.

********* ****** *** '***** and ******' ********, *** integrator **** *** *** user ** **** ** the ******** **** *** is *********** *** ***************, commissioning, *** ********.

Comments (6)

How about licensing, insurance requirements and in MA, a permit and a Public Safety License

Hey Robert:

Great feedback! We added them to the 'Risk Protection' section above. Thank you.

The MA state security system licensing requirement doesn't appear to apply to persons or businesses conducting a self-install. Rather, it appears to apply to those in the business of installing and maintaining such systems. From MGL Chapter 147 Section 57, "No person, firm or corporation shall engage in, advertise, or hold himself or itself out as being engaged in the business of installing, repairing, or offering maintenance for security systems..."

MA permitting and notification requirements appear vary widely by locality. About 70 of the 290 townships require some formal action for a security system installation, with the requirement often triggered by the alarm functions.

Just this superficial level of detail supports the point that it can be time consuming to hunt down such details, and for DIYers, there is no assurance when done that all relevant requirements have been discovered.

In my experience, procurement can be a major DIY obstacle. Often, things are not as they seem. In one case, on a tight timeline, I procured over $4,000 "worth" of gear based in part upon a vendor advertisement for their "Arecont AV5155DN-1HK Network Camera Pan / Tilt / Zoom." In another case, a Hikvision arrived with non-standard software that was completely missing some capabilities and could not change some settings such as shutter speed and power frequency. Thankfully we had the luxury of time and had only purchased a single test product in that instance.

I like to contrast video surveillance to IT. Both are complex technical fields that share some common elements. IT seems relatively mature and transparent. Even before conducting detailed research, buyers have a reasonable idea of what they'll be getting when they order a switch, or a NAS, for example. In contrast, these experiences in video surveillance suggests that the segment is still something of a wild west (eg, what does PTZ mean? What software should one expect on an IP camera purchased in the U.S. market?). Whenever it appears that deep experience is required to navigate these sorts of pitfalls, that can be a boon to industry veterans. And, those distributors got a sale from someone they'd likely never hear from again anyway: that's a win for them, right? However, what about the industry as a whole? Does the market segment win or lose when gateway experiences are discouraging?

Throw in a project "oh yeah we need off-grid power too" and all sorts of solution provisioning expertise muddies the decision process further.

Well, as both an end user and now more recently a consultant, I for one would support the "smarts and parts" approach to this issue.

Having spent probably 3 or 4 times what I would have had I let a professional take care of the whole project, I would never advise anyone in business to do a DIY install. I learnt the hard way.

In the past, part of me grudged paying top dollars watching someone spend hours and sometimes days running cables and doing things that I or my staff could have done quicker (with our knowledge of the premises). Whilst I realise that there's still a margin for installers in doing the grunt work, I think it's a short sighted view to expect this revenue stream to be around for ever.

I'm sure John and the IPVM team have made comments in the past suggesting that integrators start specialising and work to improve their knowledge base and skill set. I could not agree more. Give me an true expert for a day, not someone who can 'get the job done' in a week.

And I've mentioned this before - there's a quid to be made in an online professional tech help service. I'm sure of it.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Responsibility Split Selecting Locks - Statistics on Jul 22, 2019
A heated access debate surrounds who should pick and install the locks. While responsible for selecting the control systems, integrators often...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...
RaySharp Revealed - Major China OEM For Western Consumer Video Surveillance on Jul 02, 2019
RaySharp is mostly unknown, even among people in the video surveillance industry, though it is a major supplier of OEM surveillance equipment such...
Risk of Amazon Alexa Guard: No Battery Or Cell Backup on Jun 20, 2019
Amazon positions its Alexa Guard Service as a "smart home security system" and says it can help you "keep your home safe". However, the...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Jun 17, 2019
While face and fingerprint recognition are used regularly for smartphones, it is not as common in physical security. In this note, we examine...
ADT Eliminating Acquired Brands, Unifying Under 'Commercial' Brand on Jun 14, 2019
ADT is eliminating the brands of the many integrators it has acquired over the past few years, including Red Hawk, Aronson Security Group (ASG),...
Favorite Wireless Manufacturers 2019 on Jun 12, 2019
Many wireless options exist for video surveillance but how are integrator's overall favorites? 170 integrators answered the question: What is...
Axis Will Not Block Resellers on Jun 10, 2019
While Axis generally has strong favorability amongst integrators, the biggest complaint is their channel model, which results in smaller integrator...
Dumber Techs, Bad Box Movers, Says Australian Distributor on Jun 10, 2019
Techs today are "dumber" than they used to be, despite better education and training and that makes a typical day "frustrating" for one...

Most Recent Industry Reports

How To Quickly Assess An Unknown Company on Jul 23, 2019
There are hundreds of companies in the physical security markets, ranging from a flood of new startups to small companies that may or may not be...
Bosch Starlight 8000i Cameras Tested on Jul 23, 2019
Bosch has released their new Flexidome IP Starlight 8000i cameras, claiming "exceptional detail even in extreme low-light situations." To see...
Responsibility Split Selecting Locks - Statistics on Jul 22, 2019
A heated access debate surrounds who should pick and install the locks. While responsible for selecting the control systems, integrators often...
Vivotek Trend Micro Cyber Security Camera App Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Vivotek and Trend Micro are claiming five million blocked attacks on IP cameras, with their jointly developed app for Vivotek cameras. This new...
Avigilon ACC7 VMS Tested on Jul 22, 2019
Avigilon's Control Center 7 boldly claims it will "transform live video monitoring" with the new Focus of Attention "AI-enabled" interface. We...
History of Video Surveillance on Jul 19, 2019
The video surveillance market has changed significantly since 2000, going from VCRs to emerging into an AI cloud era.  The goal of this history...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
New GDPR Guidelines for Video Surveillance Examined on Jul 18, 2019
The highest-level EU data protection authority has issued a new series of provisional video surveillance guidelines. While GDPR has been in...
Wyze AI Analytics Tested - Beats Axis and Hikvision on Jul 17, 2019
$20 camera disruptor Wyze has released free person detection deep learning analytics to all of their users, claiming users will "Only get notified...
Anyvision Aims For 2022 Revenue of $1 Billion on Jul 17, 2019
Only 3 video surveillance manufacturers do a billion dollars or more in annual revenue - Hikvision, Dahua, and Axis. Now, Anyvision plans to join...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact