Competing Against Surveillance Self-Install / DIY

By: John Honovich, Published on May 26, 2015

End users sometimes look at integrator proposals, see ~$100 per hour pricing and think "Hey, we can do that ourselves for a lot less."

In this note, we examine 6 key issues that end users must consider when evaluating the total cost of doing it themselves.

  • Learning Curve
  • Mistakes in Design and Configuration
  • Ongoing Support
  • Training
  • Insurance and Licenses
  • Risk protection
  • Plus we cover scheduling, tools, manufacturer constraints and more

We break down each inside, including the potential costs and impact of each one. Finally, we look at the opposite side and alternative approaches.

*** ***** ********* **** at ********** *********, ***~$*** *** **** ********** ***** "***, ** can ** **** ********* for * *** ****."

** **** ****, ** examine * *** ****** that *** ***** **** consider **** ********** *** total **** ** ***** it **********.

  • ******** *****
  • ******** ** ****** *** Configuration
  • ******* *******
  • ********
  • ********* *** ********
  • **** **********
  • **** ** ***** **********, tools, ************ *********** *** more

** ***** **** **** inside, ********* *** ********* costs *** ****** ** each ***. *******, ** look ** *** ******** side *** *********** **********.

[***************]

Learning *****

** ** *********** ********** takes *** ***** ** do ** *******, **** a ******* ******** ** IT ****** ** ***** to **** ************* ****** if **** **** *** done ************ ******** ****** or **** ****** **** the ******** ****** ** systems.

*** ****** **** ** an ********** ******** *** training, ***** *** ***** needed ** ***** *** only ************ ******** *** the ****** **** **** new *****.

Mistakes ** ****** *** *************

**** **** ****** ** ******** cameras, ** *** ** setup ***, ** ******** rules ** ******** ** the ***, ************* ****-********** are ****** ** **** a ******* ** ****** mistakes.

******* ********* *** ****** is **** ********* *************** issues **** **** ** that *** **** ***** or ****. *********, *********** integrators **** **** ** solve **** ******** ** minutes ***** ** **** experiences ** ******** *********** with ************ *******. **** when *********** **** ** spend **** ****, ** is ********* **** ** they *** **** ******* eliminate ******.

Ongoing *******

*******, **** *********** ******* support *** ******** ******* for ** ***** *** first **** ***** ************. If *** ****** **** up, *********** **** *** them ** ** ********** cost ******* ****-********* ******** incur ********** *******.

********

** * ******* ** installing **********, **** *** (or ******) **** ***** people ** ************ ********, which **** **** **** and ********* **** ** the *******.

******* *********, *** ***** will ***** **** ******* to ******** *** ***** / ********* ** *******. Integrators, **** ********* **** world ********** **** ******* and ********* *** ****** show *** ****** ********* on ******* *** **** out ** *******.

Insurance *** ********

************ *********** ***** ***** numerous ********** **** ***** a ******* ** ********* deficiencies. *** ******* '****** *** *********' (*&*) ********* **** address *** ********* *** damages, ********, ** **** poor ******* ** ** corrected.  ** ********,*** ** ******* ********* * ****** *********** of ************* ****** ******** where *** ***** **** for * ******** ******* the ******* *******, ** even ******* *** ******** ability ** *** ********** completing * ***.

** * ****** ******, specific ********** *** ************** required ** ***** *********** to *********** ********** *** fitness ** ******* **** in * ******* ********* manner.  *******, ******** ***** are *** ********** ** project **********, *** **** do ******** ** ********* of ***** **** *** regulations ** **** ******* to * *****, *** casual ** '***-**-*****' *********** often **** *** ***** awareness.

Risk **********

** ********, ********* ** integrator **** * ***** price *** ********** *** project (********* ****** '**** fixed *****' ******* *** price ** **** *** fixed ********** ** *** many ****** ** **** it ***** *** ********** to ****** *** ***). This ******** **** ********** for *** *** ****, because **** **** **** is *** *****.

** ********, ** ***-**** who **** ** ********** may ******** *** *** hours, *** ** ***** 130 ** *** ** 170 *****, *** ********** cost ** ******** ******** by ****. **** **** is **** **** *********** if *** ***-**** ***** experience **** ************ ******* or *** ******** ******** being *********.

Other *******

**** *** **** ***** factors ** ** ****:

  • ******** **** - ***'* internal ********* ***** ** paid '****' $** ** $30 ** ****, *** after ****** ** *** other ******** (****** ****, vacation, **********, ***.), ***** fully ******** **** ***** be $** ** $** per ****, ******* **** the ********* *******.
  • ********** - ** ***** be ********* ** ********** in-house ********* ** ******** time ** **** ** the ************ ******, ********** if ***** ********** ***** or ********* ***** ** be **** *******.
  • ***** - *********** ***** their *** *****, ******* it ** *** ***********, testing, ***************, ***. **** an ***-**** *** **** to ***.
  • ************ *********** - ******* manufacturers **** **** ******* support *** ***** ******** through ********* *** *****.

The **** *** ***

** *** ***** ****, there *** ********** **** can **** *** **** stronger *** ***.

**** ***********, ** *** user *** **** ** being **** ** **** someone **** **** *********** expertise. ** * ******* is *** ******, **** might ** **** ** hire **** ** *********** technician ** ******** **** an **********.

******* ****** ***** ** the ***** ** *** organization *** **** ****** and ******** ** *** a ******** *******.

*******, **** ** *** organization **** *** **** experience ** *****, **** might ** * ********** amount ** ******** ********, that **** *** *********** build ** ***** *** internal '**********', *** ***** experience ******* ** *********** integrators **** ****.

Alternative / ************ ********

**** ************* *********** ** 'part' ***, ***** **** do *** **** ***** install **** - ******** cameras, ******* *******, ******* recorders, ***. *** ***** the **** ******* **** to ** **********.

********* ****** *** '***** and ******' ********, *** integrator **** *** *** user ** **** ** the ******** **** *** is *********** *** ***************, commissioning, *** ********.

Comments (6)

How about licensing, insurance requirements and in MA, a permit and a Public Safety License

Hey Robert:

Great feedback! We added them to the 'Risk Protection' section above. Thank you.

The MA state security system licensing requirement doesn't appear to apply to persons or businesses conducting a self-install. Rather, it appears to apply to those in the business of installing and maintaining such systems. From MGL Chapter 147 Section 57, "No person, firm or corporation shall engage in, advertise, or hold himself or itself out as being engaged in the business of installing, repairing, or offering maintenance for security systems..."

MA permitting and notification requirements appear vary widely by locality. About 70 of the 290 townships require some formal action for a security system installation, with the requirement often triggered by the alarm functions.

Just this superficial level of detail supports the point that it can be time consuming to hunt down such details, and for DIYers, there is no assurance when done that all relevant requirements have been discovered.

In my experience, procurement can be a major DIY obstacle. Often, things are not as they seem. In one case, on a tight timeline, I procured over $4,000 "worth" of gear based in part upon a vendor advertisement for their "Arecont AV5155DN-1HK Network Camera Pan / Tilt / Zoom." In another case, a Hikvision arrived with non-standard software that was completely missing some capabilities and could not change some settings such as shutter speed and power frequency. Thankfully we had the luxury of time and had only purchased a single test product in that instance.

I like to contrast video surveillance to IT. Both are complex technical fields that share some common elements. IT seems relatively mature and transparent. Even before conducting detailed research, buyers have a reasonable idea of what they'll be getting when they order a switch, or a NAS, for example. In contrast, these experiences in video surveillance suggests that the segment is still something of a wild west (eg, what does PTZ mean? What software should one expect on an IP camera purchased in the U.S. market?). Whenever it appears that deep experience is required to navigate these sorts of pitfalls, that can be a boon to industry veterans. And, those distributors got a sale from someone they'd likely never hear from again anyway: that's a win for them, right? However, what about the industry as a whole? Does the market segment win or lose when gateway experiences are discouraging?

Throw in a project "oh yeah we need off-grid power too" and all sorts of solution provisioning expertise muddies the decision process further.

Well, as both an end user and now more recently a consultant, I for one would support the "smarts and parts" approach to this issue.

Having spent probably 3 or 4 times what I would have had I let a professional take care of the whole project, I would never advise anyone in business to do a DIY install. I learnt the hard way.

In the past, part of me grudged paying top dollars watching someone spend hours and sometimes days running cables and doing things that I or my staff could have done quicker (with our knowledge of the premises). Whilst I realise that there's still a margin for installers in doing the grunt work, I think it's a short sighted view to expect this revenue stream to be around for ever.

I'm sure John and the IPVM team have made comments in the past suggesting that integrators start specialising and work to improve their knowledge base and skill set. I could not agree more. Give me an true expert for a day, not someone who can 'get the job done' in a week.

And I've mentioned this before - there's a quid to be made in an online professional tech help service. I'm sure of it.

Login to read this IPVM report.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

Related Reports

Installation Course - Last Chance - Register Now on Sep 12, 2019
Last Chance - Register Now - September 2019 Video Surveillance Install Course. Thursday, September 12th is your last chance to register for the...
US State Department: "Chinese Tech Giants" "Tools of the Chinese Communist Party" on Sep 12, 2019
The US State Department has called out "Chinese tech giants" for being "tools of the Chinese Communist Party" in a blunt new speech that makes...
Top Ways Security Integrators Improve Their Careers on Sep 03, 2019
With DIY products expanding and the future of integration debated, how do integrators stay sharp so they are not left behind? 180+ integrators...
Security Integrators Outlook On Remaining Integrators In 2025 on Aug 22, 2019
The industry has changed substantially in the last decade, with the rise of IP cameras and the race to the bottom. Indeed, more changes may be...
Biometrics Usage Statistics 2019 on Aug 13, 2019
Biometrics are commonly used in phones, but how frequently are they used for access? 150+ integrators told us how often they use biometrics,...
US Government Ban of Dahua, Hikvision, Huawei Takes Effect Now on Aug 13, 2019
The 'prohibition on use or procurement' of Dahua, Hikvision and Huawei products and 'essential components' take effect today, August 13, 2019, one...
Proactive CCTV "Only Affordable Video Archiving Solution" Profile on Aug 12, 2019
Proactive CCTV is claiming to offer "the only affordable video archiving solution on the market", reducing the storage typically required for H.265...
Responsibility Split Selecting Locks - Statistics on Jul 22, 2019
A heated access debate surrounds who should pick and install the locks. While responsible for selecting the control systems, integrators often...
Mobile Access Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 18, 2019
The ability to use mobile phones as access credentials is one of the biggest trends in a market that historically has been slow in adopting new...
Poor OSDP Usage Statistics 2019 on Jul 09, 2019
OSDP certainly offers advantages over decades-old Wiegand (see our OSDP Access Control Guide) but new IPVM statistics show that usage of OSDP, even...

Most Recent Industry Reports

ONVIF Suspends Huawei on Sep 20, 2019
Huawei has been 'suspended', and effectively expelled, from ONVIF so long as US sanctions remain on the mega Chinese manufacturer. Inside this...
Open Access Controller Guide (Axis, HID, Isonas, Mercury) on Sep 19, 2019
In the access control market, there are many software platforms, but only a few companies that make non-proprietary door controllers. Recently,...
Axis Perimeter Defender Improves, Yet Worse Than Dahua and Wyze on Sep 19, 2019
While Axis Perimeter Defender analytics improved from our 2018 testing, the market has improved much faster, with much less expensive offerings...
Directory of 68 Video Surveillance Startups on Sep 18, 2019
This directory provides a list of video surveillance startups to help you see and research what companies are new or not yet broadly known. 2019...
Uniview Prime Series 4K Camera Tested on Sep 18, 2019
Is the new Uniview 'Prime' better than the more expensive existing Uniview 'Pro'? In August, IPVM tested Uniview 4K 'Pro' but members advocated...
US Army Base To Buy Banned Honeywell Surveillance on Sep 17, 2019
The U.S. Army's Fort Gordon, home to their Cyber Center of Excellence, has issued a solicitation to purchase Honeywell products that are US...
Vivotek "Neural Network-Powered Detection Engine" Analytics Tested on Sep 17, 2019
Vivotek has released "a neural network-powered detection engine", named Smart Motion Detection, claiming that "swaying vegetation, vehicles passing...
Schmode is Back, Aims To Turn Boulder AI Into Giant on Sep 16, 2019
One of the most influential and controversial executives in the past decade is back. Bryan Schmode ascended and drove the hypergrowth of Avigilon...
Manufacturers Unhappy With Weak ASIS GSX 2019 And 2020 Shift on Sep 16, 2019
Manufacturers were generally unhappy with ASIS GSX, both for weak 2019 booth traffic and a scheduling shift for the 2020 show, according to a new...