Would You Take A Job At Hikvision?

JH
John Honovich
Sep 20, 2016
IPVM

Comments inside, first vote:

(5)
(1)
(2)
JH
John Honovich
Sep 20, 2016
IPVM

This arose because (1) Hikvision is one of, if not, the top hirer in video surveillance now and (2) because of the increasing awareness of Hikvision's Chinese government ownership.

I can see people making a case for each side (e.g., positive side certainly includes quality products, broad lineup, willingness to win any deal, price no object, etc.).

Curious to see how people / respond. Share your thoughts why or why not.

[Update: also see: Would You Take A Job At Axis?]

btw, if you really want to get a job at Hikvision, here is you shot to take a public stand, criticize me and help yourself stand out....

(3)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #1
Sep 20, 2016

This is an interesting topic for me as I've been in this situation recently.

As a previous AXIS employee I chose not pursue a career at Hik even after being approached by them. After years of selling the higher price / higher quality (lets not debate it here..) I couldn't bring myself around to it.

Hik is starting to show some small signs of original innovation so perhaps in a year or two this won't be the issue it is for me today.

(1)
(2)
Avatar
Marco Sanchez
Sep 20, 2016

What would you say the small signs of original innovation are?

I've only noticed them more of a "me too" company and am actually curious.

(5)
(1)
JH
John Honovich
Sep 20, 2016
IPVM

Hikvision is more 'innovative' than Samsung / Hanwha. Who is not a 'me too' company? Not many right?

(4)
Avatar
Marco Sanchez
Sep 20, 2016

I don't disagree and was not comparing them to my company. I was comparing them to the industry as a whole to see what exactly they have created as an original idea rather than just copying what another company did.

(4)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #2
Sep 20, 2016

"Let's do everything they do, but for cheaper" is kind of innovative...

(2)
(6)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #11
Sep 21, 2016

Walmart is super innovative by that definition

(5)
(4)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #2
Sep 20, 2016

Yes, please, John can get you my resume if anybody's interested.

Anonymous because I don't want my coworkers seeing this.

(8)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #3
Sep 20, 2016

Yes, success and competitive brand in surveillance market.

John, if you can help me i will send my LinkedIn link fro my resume to your mail

(2)
Avatar
Joseph Trowbridge
Sep 20, 2016

Not a chance - I will not even sell it.

(5)
(1)
U
Undisclosed #4
Sep 20, 2016

I've been approached with offers from Hik as recently as two weeks ago, and I maintain my vehement disinterest, not only because I'm extremely happy where I am, but as a result of all the negative feedback on them I've heard from credible sources. It goes without saying, too, that I would rather leave the industry altogether than sell my soul to Hik.

Since 2010, with each offer I have received, I have heeded subsequent warnings from my friends who either accepted positions at Hik or had already fled. Another most recent trend, my friends at ADI have been telling me to run in the other direction now as well. The typical basis of their warnings were being run ragged only to then be somehow screwed out of compensation, terrible customer service policies, abhorrent product quality, direct business sales models which they felt were creating a conflict that would burn bridges and tarnish past relationships for them, and with ADI... well, I think ADI big shots have a short list of reasons why they want to stop feeding this monster they've created.

As if these weren't compelling enough reasons for me to avoid Hik, I also loathe the idea of reporting to one particular slimy, conniving, weasely douchebag of a VP.

Pass.

(10)
(3)
JH
John Honovich
Sep 20, 2016
IPVM

abhorrent product quality, direct business sales models

Hikvision has abhorrent product quality? Where are you getting that from? That's certainly not the consensus from dealers?

As for direct sales, you mean Ezviz or?

U
Undisclosed #4
Sep 20, 2016

I'm not of the impression their product quality is quite as bad now as it once was, but given that I sold as much of it as I did white-label, my 'abhorrent' statement is consistent with experiences my company had.

By 'direct sales', these individuals were referring to backdooring distributors, as well as dealers/integrators.

(2)
JH
John Honovich
Sep 20, 2016
IPVM

backdooring distributors, as well as dealers/integrators.

Elaborate? How were they backdooring?

U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 20, 2016
IPVMU Certified

By 'direct sales', these individuals were referring to backdooring distributors, as well as dealers/integrators.

The Hik model now 'backdoors' end-users directly ;)

(1)
(3)
U
Undisclosed #4
Sep 20, 2016

^ What he said.

(2)
U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 20, 2016
IPVMU Certified

^ What He said.

(1)
MC
Marty Calhoun
Sep 20, 2016
IPVMU Certified

Sounds like a personal weaselly vendetta that a child cant get over in lieu of admitting HIKVISION has become a market leader, has 100% acceptable quality merchandise at the absolute best cost point in the market.

Article after article HERE ON IPVM denounces the OWNERSHIP side of HIKVISION but is very fair when it comes to product review and what is becoming the very best LOCAL SUPPORT MACHINE in the industry. Of course there are detractors but whining about past transgressions has its place and that is not slamming the HIKVISION machine.

(1)
(9)
(5)
JH
John Honovich
Sep 20, 2016
IPVM

IPVM denounces the OWNERSHIP side of HIKVISION

Just to clarify, saying we 'denounce' the ownership side is too harsh for our take.

(1) We are adamant that Hikvision admit to who they are. The government is just another shareholder explanation is clearly wrong and we have proven it. People should know the truth.

(2) There are serious things to consider about how Chinese government ownership impacts Hikvision, both economically and for cybersecurity. Reasonable people can certainly disagree about the significance of this and the impact on their purchases.

(10)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #5
Sep 20, 2016

Has anyone considered this company manufactures IP cameras being sold and installed to protect critical US facilities and is owned by the Chinese Government that is accused of cyber security violations/attacks by our government??

(6)
(3)
U
Undisclosed #4
Sep 20, 2016

No. Surely, you must be joking.

(6)
U
Undisclosed #7
Sep 20, 2016

As a consultant i cannot recommend the product. It would be a shame if there were in fact, no devious issues; because I hear no complaints from folks that use their products (notwithstanding the above) cant take that chance.

Don't know how many noticed this at ASIS, but there were a lot of Americans staffing the booth this year. Last year it was only Chinese. Did anyone else sens this.?

Oh no; Hikevision is mind controlling Americans to take over the US of A!!!

(2)
U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 20, 2016
IPVMU Certified

I'd rather take a Hik than take a job.

(1)
MT
Matt Transue
Sep 20, 2016

I was approached by Hik for a Sales Engineer role just over a year ago.

The guy (I forget his name) who I spoke with about the job...who would have been my direct boss, was a dick.

You could tell in his voice that he either hated his job or hated dealing with people...or both.

In any case, not a good impression about the company or the individual.

When you breed a culture of contempt you have no chance to succeed professionally or personally.

I ran from the opportunity very quickly.

(2)
(6)
(4)
U
Undisclosed #8
Sep 20, 2016

I interviewed there early last year and found them to be totally unorganized, cheap, (they made me fly 5 hours cross country the morning of the interview drive an hour across town, interview for 2 hours then when I missed my return flight that afternoon (yes, same day in & out) they refused to pay for a hotel room!) and clueless when it came to their expectations...and this was for a management position...

Of course all of this was before they hired Frank DiFina...I think he may have been the only person to bring them a little class! They also have a history of being right up there with Avigilon when it comes to turnover...I have seen them let some pretty good people go.

I would say...stay away...FAR AWAY!

(3)
(6)
(1)
JH
John Honovich
Sep 20, 2016
IPVM

They also have a history of being right up there with Avigilon when it comes to turnover...I have seen them let some pretty good people go.

I have not seen that much turnover from Hikvision USA in the past few years, especially relative to their size and compared to Avigilon. There was a lot in 2012 / 2013, which a source close to the company said was connected to a change in Chinese senior management.

If I am missing something, I'd certainly like to know. I also suspect it is going to increase as (1) harder to manage bigger organizations, (2) the govt issue, (3) enterprise expansion is a lot tougher than beating re-labelers at ADI.

U
Undisclosed #8
Sep 20, 2016

I saw them let 3-5 RSM's go a year ago...and they did it through email! Classy folks...

(1)
UE
Undisclosed End User #9
Sep 20, 2016

Nah, funnier to crack their shit, u can't do that as employee, ethically..

(1)
(1)
JH
John Honovich
Sep 20, 2016
IPVM

9, are you working on anything to that end?

MC
Marty Calhoun
Sep 20, 2016
IPVMU Certified

We are on the East coast, I dont have anything bad to say whatsoever so if that is what you are seeking move on to the next rant. I started selling HIKVISION with Zero knowledge about the company or the products or the staff or the upper management. I have worked with Local product support (first class), technical support from California (professional , super knowledgeable and called me at home at 10 pm to offer a 2nd solution), as far a Sales well, he answers my calls every-time I call and has supported my questions many times on Saturdays and Sundays. We sell higher end systems, larger systems possibly, and have had issues arise when you push new products to the edge. Speaking of the edge it is nice to know that when you are under the gun, feeling the pressure of making sure your customer is 100% cared for and Jeffery He calls to let you know he has your back, that is different, HIKVISION is different, they are an excellent organization with growing pains but the right people are in the right places and they will do nothing but get better because there are many dealers like me that understand that difference.

THANK YOU HIKVISION

(6)
(7)
(4)
(3)
(5)
JH
John Honovich
Sep 20, 2016
IPVM

To the people voting Marty's comment unhelpful, please do not do that.

Unhelpful is for comments that are clearly off topic or attack people. Marty's clearly does not do either. You can certainly feel free to vote disagree if you disagree but don't use unhelpful to signal disagreement.

Moreover, I voted Marty's comment informative because he shared a number of key pieces of information, including:

as far as Sales; well, he answers my calls every-time I call and has supported my questions many times on Saturdays and Sundays.

If you are a Hikvision customer, that is awesome. As a prospective Hikvision sales person, that will turn some off.

(6)
(1)
(1)
Avatar
Ricardo Souza
Sep 20, 2016
Motorola Solutions • IPVMU Certified

Business is Business

If you consider just pay & benefits and it´s a good package, why not? Maybe i or you could be a valuable asset for them and change things for the better.

And ultimately.... it´s the people that make a company =)

Edit: I voted Yes.

And yes i am an IndigoVision employee. But that´s my opinion and my personal view, no strings attached.

=P

(1)
(1)
U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 21, 2016
IPVMU Certified

...it's the people that make a company =)

In this case the peoples republic.

(2)
(9)
Avatar
Jon Dillabaugh
Sep 21, 2016
Pro Focus LLC

I voted maybe because every man has his price. You can all get up on a high horse and say "not me", but if the money was right, you wouldn't turn it down.

That said, it doesn't seem like they are tossing all of that Chinese cash around on employees, so maybe it is just me dreaming.

And to second Marty's comment about his rep being very attentive, I can second that as well. My rep answers emails almost instantly, no matter what day or time.

Heck, I even ran into him at the grocery store this weekend, but he made it known he was an Ohio State fan, which took his credibility down quite a few notches in this humble Michigan fan's opinion.

(3)
(2)
(2)
RS
Robert Sears
Sep 27, 2016

Admitting you are for sale to the highest bidder shows you shouldnt be working in the security industry.. remember that contract you signed ? How much are corp secrets going for these days.

(1)
U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 21, 2016
IPVMU Certified

For those of you unwilling to take a salaried position with Hik, there is ample freelance work available as well:

(1)
U
Undisclosed #10
Sep 21, 2016

[Note: Poster is from Dahua]

I could not imagine working for anyone other than the chinese in this market. It really must hurt the sales people from other companies soo much when you lose deal after deal to hik and dahua.

Once Hik buys Avigilon then everyones finished.

(2)
(1)
(1)
U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 21, 2016
IPVMU Certified

Once Hik buys Avigilon then everyones finished

Everyone

(2)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #18
Dec 27, 2016

[everyone's] or [everyone is]

(1)
Avatar
Oleksiy Zayonchkovskyy
Sep 21, 2016
IPVMU Certified

No, cause I would not like to support globalization in that manner... Even if the quality now is adequate, market monopolization, which is a number one goal, will lead to great quality degrade in the future... Star status will kill or significantly slow down the need to evolve as it already happened with Intel and Cisco. The other way the company will become a big acquisition monster of ideas and patents like IBM.

That was in Cisco Russia... One of sales representatives regularly talked to customers like this: "You are not going to buy Cisco? Are you crazy? Everybody buy Cisco!" - that was the main argument. I don't know what happened next to him after several complaints from customers but the treatment matters!

(1)
(1)
RS
Robert Sears
Sep 26, 2016

I wont work for communists and since the gov/military in Red China owns most of Hikvision that makes them communists.

(7)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #12
Sep 26, 2016

No. For the same reason I cannot vote for either current presidential candidate. Morals and ethics. Perhaps in this industry, that removes me from much more than Hik, but it's a non-starter for me. The company must have a strong reputation for ethical behavior and the very fact that this conversation is happening brings too many questions to light.

(1)
(1)
JS
Jarod Stockdale
Sep 26, 2016

This is an interesting discussion to be sure. In my own opinion I think that anyone considering HIK as a perspective employer need to weigh their own circumstances and career ambitions. Personally I would not accept a position with HIK, but in the same breath I certainly would not find fault with a colleague who did. This is based on my own professional ambition and career path. Look at it from the perspective of a father with a teenage daughter, and the manufacturers are potential suitors coming to the house for a first date in the most generic stereotypes:

Axis would be that preppie guy with a nice car, good haircut, and respectful. He's headed to college and his future looks bright. You are comfortable and not very worried when they leave.

Pelco/Honeywell is that big dude on the football team, he has his own car although not a nice as Axis. He's the guy that you take an extra minute alone with to make sure you see eye to eye, regardless of his size... but you trust your daughter and the kid is well mannered and smart.

Samsung/Sony is the nice middle class kid down the block. His grades are ok and you've known him for a few years; he's headed to the local community college. he is driving his moms car or else your daughter is driving. This is the kid that you worry if he can hold his own if there is trouble when the kids are out on the town, but you trust he is not the Don Juan type.

HIKVision is that inevitable kid that shows up on the motorcycle and honks his horn in the driveway. He is not interested in earning respect or approval, and you're pretty sure he is "just this close" to being a criminal although you can't prove it. The one thing you do know is that she is not getting on that bike and you're pretty sure any date with this guy will require a parental chaperone!

Is this an accurate portrayal, probably not totally but I think it is an accurate perception of HIK vs. other manufacturers. Like it or not, as security professionals "Perception" is a large part of our job, and Trust is what we sell. I would not be comfortable working for a company, and especially marketing a brand that I did not fully trust. I have worked extensively with HIK product and found the devices to be user friendly and reliable and the competitive pricing is obviously very attractive for end-users with small businesses. Tech support has been helpful and well versed when I have required their assistance, albeit hold-times in peak hours are sometimes long. At the regional sales support level I have found them to be lacking in training and experience but that was not a deal breaker. At the end of the day there is the undeniable influence of the Chinese Communist party. In the world of high end controls and integration this is a deal-breaker. I could not with good conscience recommend a product noted for lax cyber-security and questionable sponsorship into a high security project.

Additionally, I personally take issue with their price slashing of the industry. I believe this to be a politically motivated operation. The business side of it is no more than a State sponsored subsidy meant to disrupt a global market for goods. It is easy enough to recognize some very similar and parallel conditions to how the Saudi's have been working to collapse the energy markets over the last few years. Politically, already as the worlds largest manufacturer, we do not know the real end game; nor what the effect of the disruption of pricing will have in the next few years. What w we can already see is a reduction of quality across the IP Cam industry. Technical support has been a close second in manufacturer cost reductions to try and maintain their market share against artificial price competition. What has been fact is time and again HIK devices have been subject to very easy cyber breach and has been slow to react and improve. Last week Brian Krebs (Krebs on Security) webpage was brought down by the largest DDoS attack ever seen. The dust is just beginning to settle but one thing that researchers and investigators already know is the majority of devices used in the botnet attack were IP cameras, DVR's and NVR's. It will be interesting to see deeper research over the coming months if device information is provided. I wonder how many HIK devices would be on that list?

Finally, last week Yahoo announced a breach of over 500 million user accounts, (mine was one of them) by a State sponsored attack. Which state, well we haven't been told that yet but where does you mind automatically go? Now explain to me again why this manufacturer would be acceptable in a US military base, embassy, or FBI office? I consider my reputation in this industry to be my strongest asset. Yes I have installed and sold HIK in previous employment. Yes the products I sold and installed were reliable and mostly did what they said they would. But I made sure those customers understood the risks associated with the pricing and provided alternatives. The question here is would I REPRESENT HIK as an employee, associating my hard earned reputation to theirs? No I would not.

Would I recommend it to a friend or neighbor who needed a low cost reliable system? Yes; and I have recently for basic low security applications with prudent precautions in place. But when my children's school, the local military recruiter, or the shopping mall who has a higher need for security and lower risk tolerance asks for a recommendation, it is simply not good enough, I don't trust it.

NOTICE: This comment has been moved to its own discussion: Axis, Hikvision, Honeywell, Pelco, Samsung As '"Your Daughter's Boyfriend"

(1)
(4)
(1)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #11
Sep 26, 2016

This is my favorite post ever! If I had time I would add to the list of companies and "your daughter's boyfriend" equivalents, but I have a feeling that list will grow on its own shortly. Don't fail me IPVM.

(1)
(1)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #13
Sep 26, 2016

I've had offers to work for Hik and can't bring myself to do it. I have at least 10 friends and former co-workers there. Most went there after being downsized and a couple on promise of great pay. When I inquired with my friends, they tell me that the culture is not one conducive to happiness and that the low end products fail more than we even know. Also, each has confided that they do not make nearly what was projected at the time they were hired. At least one former co-worker made it 7 months before quitting....that individual prefers not to list having worked for Hik on his LinkedIn page. What does that tell you?

(1)
U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 26, 2016
IPVMU Certified

Nice post!

What we can already see is a reduction of quality across the IP Cam industry...

You don't mean a reduction of quality in IP cameras themselves, do you?

Every year cheaper AND better quality, no?

JS
Jarod Stockdale
Sep 27, 2016

Thank you for reading. Yes in fact I do mean a reduction in quality of the cameras themselves. I will grant that the performance in Megapixel resolutions, frames per second, and compression has improved significantly. To that end the performance and capability has improved and will continue to improve. However, I do not see those improvements as being specific to the security industry. In fact I would attribute much of those technology improvements to the consumer market for demand for Facetime, Skype, GoPro, and similar services who have parallel needs to the CCTV business and technology advances are "borrowed" from the consumer market and find a happy home in the CCTV market. Innovation and improvements are driven by demand and dollars, and as much as we'd like to think our industry delivers both, the reality is the investment capital into consumer mobile market dwarfs our little niche marketplace. Take a look at the acquisitions of Milestone and Axis by Canon. The Milestone software has improved with the larger corporate dollars while the Axis support has begun to suffer and the devices are now seeing a higher fail rate than ever before as prices fall to compete.

When I mention quality I am actually speaking on the engineering process both in hardware and software. Generally, when prices fall costs are cut. That means just as we do in the construction process there is a value engineering that takes place at the component level. Can we save $.03 per capacitor by switching to X brand? Can we save cost by using gaskets of recycled instead of new? Do we really need to use an onboard processor that has 30% more capacity than we need, or can we spec a different one to operate at 95% and save $1 per device? It's what I refer to as the "ADT Effect". Many will recall 15 years ago when ADT began their "free equipment" sales program. This effectively forced nearly all competitors to adopt similar tactics selling alarm systems that were grossly ineffective and without proper coverage or verification ability. That led to overwhelming first responders with false alarm calls and legal ordinances and non response laws.

The pattern is strikingly similar. Manufacturers are value engineering devices, and even as they increase capability; things like engineering, longevity, and reliability suffer. Add the reduction of qualified tech support and out-sourcing off shores and we are seeing that pattern beginning to repeat. This is the biggest loser in the artificial pricing game. Ultimately the performance among brands becomes so similar that pricing wins the day. That's great for small firms who rely on small jobs to survive, bad for the industry where better quality is required for the major league deals.

Would you purchase a car this way? Imagine if Japan began to subsidize Toyota and you could buy that new Camry or Prius for $10k ? Could GM ever compete in that world without totally redesigning their fleet? Would the European manufacturers BMW, Audi, VW, survive? Possibly, but not without severely cutting their niceties. Sure they can all go 100mph and they all get similar mileage but that Chevy and VW is still $15. And with all the plastic and vinyl would anyone ever really want a BMW? Obviously that's a over-generalization to make the point but I think its a fair argument. What is really interesting when using this car analogy is the Government intervention perspective. If it was Japan subsidizing Toyota there would be global outrage and tariffs imposed without question and at light speed to protect markets. Why is there non-response around the world for the CCTV industry? Back to my earlier statement, we in the security industry just are not big enough to merit that much notice. We generate a few billion a year in sales, which in a global market is pretty small potatoes. I'd love to see HIK manufacture a smart phone and try this tactic in an industry that would generate attention. I'm betting the result would be different...

(2)
(2)
U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 27, 2016
IPVMU Certified

The pattern is strikingly similar. Manufacturers are value engineering devices, and even as they increase capability; things like engineering, longevity, and reliability suffer...

Agree and disagree. Certainly the West is feeling the strain of trying to compete at the lower end. Yes, Axis notably, seems to be having product reliability issues, to which I suggested this possible explanation:

Hikua has always designed their cameras to be cheap from the ground up. While Axis' R&D went towards developing technology to deliver higher performing cameras, Hikua's went towards developing the know how to produce them cheaper.

And as Hikua has played catch-up to Axis for features, Axis may have a little learning to do about how to make cameras cheaper. Consider that simply substituting a cheaper, but equally functional component in an already working design, has risk associated with it.

Translation: Axis may be trying to aggressively reduce costs by using less expensive components/processes.

Still, whether, $500 dollars 5 years ago actually got you a better Axis camera than $500 today would get you I'm not sure.

However, I don't think anyone would deny that Hikua has come from utter crap to at least usable gear in the last few years. And they are giving 5 years warranties now as well.

Yes, I know that the playing field may not be level, however we are only talking about the quality of the camera at present vs before, not how or why.

As for whether the improvements are due to the security industry or the electronics industry at large, I would agree that many have been trickle down with adaptations. Then again we would still be on ccds if it weren't for smartphones.

If it was Japan subsidizing Toyota...

Or the U.S. buying G.M.?

(1)
JS
Jarod Stockdale
Sep 27, 2016

Could I have gotten a better cameras 5 years ago with $500 as I can get today with the same $500 ? On first glance, I would conceded maybe not. But then I would recall that 5 years ago I would not have been able to purchase a 3MP IP camera for $500 from Axis, Pelco, Bosch, Panasonic, Honeywell or other top tier brands. The other side is 5 years ago I had a better level of technical support from native English speaking techs. To be clear that is not meant as an insult to outside US support, a good technician in any language is an asset, but a language barrier delays and frustrates the resolution of issues.

Now we must address that the US Government bailout of GM from bankruptcy is not the same as subsidizing sales prices. I'm not going to touch the political aspect of that situation, but I can say unequivocally that the price of Silverado trucks did not come down by half in the bailout. That's the difference. The Chinese government invested billions of dollars in the last few years to maintain sales costs at a level that can not be maintained without government subsidies. The global disruption appears at least to be intentional as stated by Oleksiy in a previous post to this thread. Could a global monopoly of security products be the ultimate goal? With the government of China as the captain of this boat, the same government who is right now annexing sovereign territory of their neighbors in the South China Sea, I would speculate that is reasonable assumption.

In the end the topic was "would you accept an job from HIK?". I believe that in our industry it is unfortunate that so many of our colleagues prefer to stick their head in the sand and collect a paycheck rather than confront the realities of the world today. As I said before, I have sold and installed HIK. I agree that they do make a good and competitive product, and if the Chinese government was not an investor and the company was independent of political influence my opinion would be different. But the reality is, the Chinese government is the largest investor, pricing is subsidized, and there is political motivation in the everyday business operation. We are in a business where our one and only product is trust. I believe that trust is earned through integrity. Integrity is based in character. Character is the sum of your actions. The action of compromising principles, regardless of the justification, is a compromise of character, a chink in the armor or integrity, and a failure of trust. I've worked my entire career to establish my character and integrity to my colleagues and clients. I would not accept a position with HIK because I am not willing to compromise the trust I've established over may career, allowing my credibility to be used by a company who has not been able to merit their own. I believe these things matter, and I hope that as our industry continues to grow, more and more of my colleagues will begin to understand their responsibility to be vigilant in maintaining the trust of their clients. That is what it means to be a professional and worthy of your clients trust.

(2)
(1)
U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 27, 2016
IPVMU Certified

The other side is 5 years ago I had a better level of technical support from native English speaking techs.

I agree with this, and assumed this was the type of 'quality' you were referring to initially.

...but I can say unequivocally that the price of Silverado trucks did not come down by half in the bailout.

There may be compelling arguments as to why a US bailout of GM was different than subsidizing an industry, but surely this is not one of them. Obviously, if they failed they were not selling enough at a high enough price to cover expenses already. The price would not go any lower.

The money from the bailout effectively subsidized their activity before the failure, not after. Free market economics would say they should fail. They didn't. If HIK stiffs the state bank on the 6 billion it borrowed and the debt is forgiven, it would be a similiar situation in many ways.

...a chink in the armor of integrity...

Not implying you meant anything by this (and I'm sure you didn't), but its a phrase better avoided in the current subject matter, such is the world we live in.

UE
Undisclosed End User #14
Sep 27, 2016

I'm going to spend about $100k next year on cameras. If anyone here wants a piece of it, you should probably work for hikvision.

(2)
(3)
U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 27, 2016
IPVMU Certified

I'm going to spend about $100k next year on cameras. If anyone here wants a piece of it, you should probably work for hikvision.

If everyone goes and works for Hikvision, then the competition would suffer, no?

As a intelligent buyer, why would you want the largest camera manufacturer in the world, who also is fastest growing camera manfacturer in the world, (an unusual combination to say the least) to get bigger?

What kind of buyer are you?

(1)
(1)
U
Undisclosed #8
Sep 27, 2016

This is all well and good for you but has nothing to do with whether this is a good place to work...

Also just to put things into perspective...100k is nice for the small players but the larger companies have $6-10M quotas for their regions so your 100k is less than your RSM needs per week...

(2)
UE
Undisclosed End User #14
Sep 28, 2016

Good thing I don't have an RSM. I go direct to distributor and cut out the "integrator".

With this new hikvision project, and a 40/100g infrastructure upgrade in three data centers, I'm going to put his kids through college next year.

Except he doesn't have any kids.... so he'll probably just retire.

Yall know what's scary? At some point Hikvision is going to stop name plating their products, so there will be no shame in putting them up all over the place.

(1)
JH
John Honovich
Sep 28, 2016
IPVM

I go direct to distributor and cut out the "integrator".

14, you're really making friends here ;)

It's good input though, thanks for sharing!

(1)
U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 28, 2016
IPVMU Certified

At some point Hikvision is going to stop name plating their products...

What point will that be exactly?

Avatar
Ethan Ace
Sep 28, 2016

I was just going to ask the same thing.

Why would Hikvision stop putting their name on product after they've spent the past few years trying to build brand recognition?

Avatar
Jon Dillabaugh
Sep 28, 2016
Pro Focus LLC

Maybe he meant they will stop OEMing their products? At least that's what I hope he meant. Otherwise, I missed his point.

U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 28, 2016
IPVMU Certified

You're right, that's what he must mean!

The 'shame' he spoke of wasn't having 'Hikvision' labled on every camera, it was the shame of NOT having it on every camera...

U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 28, 2016
IPVMU Certified

Good thing I don't have an RSM.

Sure you do, if you have a 'Region'...

I go direct to distributor and cut out the "integrator".

Actually, the RSM works for Hikvision, make sure he gets his 'piece' of the hundred grand, as promised.

UI
Undisclosed Integrator #15
Sep 28, 2016

As a citizen of a former communist country I'd rather sweep the streets than working for communists once again.

(3)
(4)
(3)
U
Undisclosed #16
Sep 28, 2016

I voted no, but let me just clarify -

Hell no. Not a chance in the world, for any amount of money.

(4)
(1)
(1)
U
Undisclosed #6
Sep 28, 2016
IPVMU Certified
(1)
(2)
U
Undisclosed #16
Nov 07, 2016

Ha! That was not me, I assure you. But, glad to see someone with as strong of an opinion as myself. :)

UI
Undisclosed Integrator #17
Nov 07, 2016

I was actually offered a job at Hikvision and was recruited very heavily for it. My logic here is the same as it was for Dahua. I have held positions that required security clearances and most likely will again in the future. I did not want to deal with all of the crazy questions that could be generated by working for a Chinese company.

(2)
(1)
Avatar
Garry Carson
Feb 13, 2017

From what i have read really does go off the subject of "Would you take a job at Hikvison"

I have installed Hikvison product and had no problem with them, and yes if the people that i was going to work with seemed good then why not work for them?

(1)
RS
Robert Sears
Feb 13, 2017

Since they are proven to be majority owned by the Red Chinese Communist govt I would have to say Hell No. Americans working for a foreign govt owned anything should be a problem somewhere in laws regulating foreign trade not to mention espionage laws. That this is still a open for discussion in a "Security" discussion group is curious since it would potentially violate national security at some level.

(2)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #19
May 15, 2017

No

(2)
RS
Robert Shih
May 15, 2017
Independent

Only to sabotage the Chinese government in any way shape or form I could.

New discussion

Ask questions and get answers to your physical security questions from IPVM team members and fellow subscribers.

Newest discussions