Subscriber Discussion
Will Cities Call For More Surveillance Cameras To Combat 'KNock-Out Game' Attacks?

01/19/14 11:23pm
Almost every day, it seems a new victim is attacked.
But should cameras even be proposed?
Can they really do anything except change the location chosen by the punks doing this?
Is the 'Knock-Out Game' even a real thing - and if it is a real thing, is it a new real thing?
Should these punks be buried up to their necks in ice so anyone who wants to can practice their slapshot?
Sidebar: Feel free to chime in RE: arming seniors with guns, etc...

IPVMU Certified | 01/20/14 03:59am
Although it may sound self serving as we all work for this industry, I do feel having more cameras will reduce crime or at least enable justice to be served after a crime has been committed, thus reducing crime in the long run. I am from Taiwan and our capital city of Taipei had installed a city wide surveillance camera system a few years back. The mayor of Taipei then made a commercial (probably for his own political gains) stating how the rate of solving robbery cases had gone from 30~40% to 100%.
I take the numbers he gave with a grain of salt but I do believe the surveillance system has definitely helped in solving crimes.
Newest Discussions
Discussion | Posts | Latest |
---|---|---|
Started by
Scott Zuniga
|
31
|
less than a minute by Ryan King |
Started by
Ethan Ace
|
7
|
less than a minute by John Honovich |
Started by
Jermaine Wilson
|
4
|
about 1 hour by Undisclosed Integrator #1 |
Started by
Donald Maye
|
3
|
less than a minute by John Honovich |
Started by
Jermaine Wilson
|
6
|
less than a minute by Undisclosed Manufacturer #4 |