Subscriber Discussion

What Are Typical Use Cases For Networked Access Control Vs. Traditional Panels?

ML
Mark Lummus
Jan 29, 2013

When is networked Access Control superior to traditionl Access Control (i.e. with centralized panels)

thanks!

JH
John Honovich
Jan 29, 2013
IPVM

Mark, this post on IP Readers vs Control Panels might be useful to you.

ML
Mark Lummus
Jan 29, 2013

Thanks John! We'll check it out.

SP
Sean Patton
Jan 29, 2013

Personally in any greenfield deployment, networked AC should be much easier and quicker to deploy than centralized panels. Also any sites with existing network infrastructure and no current AC panels should be easier/cheaper.

Also many of the IP networked systems can drive a 12/24V strike using the PoE power to the controller; but you will still need standalone power supplies for mags/ELR solutions

GK
Gregory Kemper, PSP
Jan 30, 2013

As a rule I typically recomend networked devices for internal applications and traditional access control for external. When takin a "layered" security approach this is the best method IMO. Keep in mind one of the primary objectives of EAC is increasing delay to forced entry. By usining tradional devices externally you Increase delay time with the ability to use stronger locking devices. Internally you can add additional accountability at a much lower cost using network devices.

New discussion

Ask questions and get answers to your physical security questions from IPVM team members and fellow subscribers.

Newest discussions