The low light claims get even more insane. Here come Cigarette Light cameras?
Through miserable translations (ie: sartlight, vadalproof) this manufacturer is claiming '0.000001 Lux' sensitive cameras, and even drops in a picture in to show it off.
Why is this low light claim, or any manufacturer claim like this reason to send this to the spam folder?
Wow, are they TRYING to sell these or scare you away? This seems to me like anti-marketing!
The question is: Will this well intentioned attempt at a creating worldwide low-light standard through the use of relatively inexpensive, readily available and consistently illuminating cigarettes LuxSticks, be accepted as such by John or will he choose to deride the effort altogether, or worse, demand that warning labels be placed on such product?
Besides providing a much needed shot-in-the-arm to the ailing tobacco industry, this could provide the critical one-two punch test metric of camera Shootout / Smokeout that has been lacking for too long... ;)
Ask questions and get answers to your physical security questions from IPVM team members and fellow subscribers.
