Using Lower Cost Cameras With 1000+ Genetec System

There will be a couple things to consider.

What do you consider low cost?

Hikvision cameras are not supported by Genetec, so you can scratch those off the list if you were considering them. This will obviously impact any of the Hik OEMs that are out there as well.

Lower cost Hanwha and Axis cameras have performed well in our testing, and generally offer full support with Genetec, but they aren't nearly as low cost as Dahua (just for an example). A low cost Axis M3045-V sells for ~$240 online, versus a similar model from Dahua (DH-IPC-HFW42A1SN) can be found for ~$150.

Ultimately, it really shouldn't matter as long as the cameras produce the images you require, and the cameras are supported by Genetec. Many integrators stand by Dahua and other low cost options as being good cameras for fair prices, regardless of VMS.

I've been having a lot of success with the Hanwha XNV-6011.  They are less expensive than the Axis model you've called out, small, discrete, 2MP, vandal resistant, and indoor/outdoor.  They also make a flush mount version for ceiling tiles.

Consider managing passwords and firmware management across cameras when dealing with large sites. Dealing with multi brands can be painstaking as you divert your attention across multiple vendors for any fixes/ feature. Look for something that is durable for years [from EOL and support perspective]. Consider cybersecurity aspect of things as well when hooking onto cheap products.

100% agree with U3.  We're in a similar situation (Ed end-user, 1000 cam, Milestone).  Standardized on Axis.  The tools we use cover the whole implementation which really cuts down on our personnel time overhead.  Their (axis) portfolio is also robust now to cover pretty much all of our needs: high-end all the way down to (recently) low cost cameras which I'd peg at $300 or less.  Maybe even cheaper.   My definition anyway.  I know some folks might say <$100 or even $50 but I don't see most of that level as really viable for what we're shooting for / for the way we operate. 

Take a look at the Hanwha Q series cameras. We have deployed about a 100 of them since March with great success in K-12 school districts. We aren't a Genetec house so I would recommend getting one in and seeing how you like it. 

Have you tried going direct to a dealer?

..crickets..

We specify (I am a consultant) a lot of Hanwha Q-series cameras on our K-12 projects where budgets are an issue.  Specifically, we specify QND-7080R for the flexibility of the varifocal lens with autofocus and the 4mp resolution.  When budgets get really tight, we will lean towards the fixed lens options such as the 4mp QND-7010R or the 2mp QND-6010R.  For exterior cameras, we still lean towards the Hanwha X series for the better performance, but the QNV-7080R is also still a decent option.

Genetec has a very good integration with these cameras incorporating both the H.265 and the ability to set the WiseStream smart codecs right from the Genetec interface.  You can also adjust the WDR, hallway view mode, update firmware and many other camera settings right from the Genetec interface making the management much easier.

Thanks Sean, Steve, Michael, Brandon, end users & integrators for useful information. I tried to summarize as below:

Advantages:

1. Reduced cost
2. Technical fit if the camera model is compatible with Genetec
3. Having different brand will eliminate monopoly to get better rate & service

 Disadvantages:

1. Having multiple brands means:
1. Managing different firmware and security patches
2. Managing different vendors and their product warranty
2. Cheaper products may have more cyber security risk

To conclude, is it correct to say "We can go ahead with mix of 2-3 brands with Genetec as long as it fits in our technical requirements and cost"

Once you pick some cameras that fit the budget don't forget to trail them in real life circumstances. I'd look for the following too:

#1 Do they provide the image you need day/night or in certain circumstances such as strong backlight.

#2 Can they do the above without excessive throughput? If you are saving on cameras but spending more on servers and storage is it really worth it?

#3 Various features which are helpful - Multicast from camera (if you are using that). 2-3 streams to allow for stream switching or remote viewing. Granular motion detection on camera (Green bars of motion activity in recording timeline). Physical fit/finish, ease of installation etc.

I'm not sure on your installation requirements, however mounting, cabling and licensing could easily swamp the price delta in the cameras. You also need to consider that every new camera type might require additional spares if you do like for like replacement on failure. On the other side, you may not stock many or any spares depending on your replacement/repair minimum durations.