Subscriber Discussion

Thought Exercise: Remote Client Application

EN
Evan Nardone
Mar 21, 2019

Hey everyone, I have a client that posed an interesting question so I thought I'd see what you great minds had for a solution. This client has 100+ remote locations nationally. Most of these locations have their own cameras and access control, but there is a need/want to place a single camera, maybe two on some sites outside of the on-site system for our use.

These locations would all have internet access and power, we don't need a ton of analytics (although it would be nice), and we want to keep install as simple as possible. Would an IP camera using a cloud-based NVR be the best solution? My understanding is that providers like Avigilon Blue and Eagle Eye still require an on-site appliance to then run to the cloud, correct? Would there be an option out there that wouldn't require and on-site device? Or am I living in a fantasy world of cheap, easy, and functional. 

UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #1
Mar 21, 2019

You could use an edge technology where the SD Card becomes your onsite storage. I think most VMS manufacturers have varying degrees of support for SD cards in cameras.

You would not need cloud, but rather locate your "VMS" in a location with sufficient bandwidth for the maximum amount of live or playback streams you need at one time. Of course this could be an AWS or Azure instance, or a server in a data center, or in your own main office.

Specifically with Milestone you can use what's called SQVR (Scalable Quality Video Recording) which means you record high-res video (or whatever you want) directly onto the SD card, and then you configure a low-res (or whatever you want) stream that will be sent to your centralized "recorder".

When you are playing back the low-res video, you can highlight the timeline and make a request to pull the high-res video down as needed.

I think this would be good for a situation where you don't want a box on-site, and it also conserves bandwidth back to the centralized server. 

Milestone Employee

(2)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #3
Mar 21, 2019

Just a caveat to UM1's suggest of SD Card storage. If you are in a hospital, or any other site, that does consistent generator/power checks you will want to check the indexing on the SD Card. I have seen multiple failures on local recording because the camera did not power cycle correctly and the index gets messed up across multiple manufactures. Just my 2 cents. 

(3)
EN
Evan Nardone
Apr 11, 2019

This is great, thank you. And this also confirms some of the other solutions I had heard. If I use an SD compatible camera for local storage, then use a native VMS anywhere that would work. Milestone, Gentec, etc. But then someone suggested using the Axis free software to do the same thing?

UI
Undisclosed Integrator #2
Mar 21, 2019

I am not for certain but I do know Genetec has a cloud offering for VMS they call it Genetec Stratocast.  It may be worth looking into but I am not sure how it would look as far as architecture on site nor am I aware of the costs.

U
Undisclosed #5
Apr 11, 2019

Genetec Stratocast is exactly the model that the OP is requesting. It requires nothing but an Axis camera connected to a network that has internet connectivity. The camera connects directly to the Stratocast cloud and video is recorded there.

EN
Evan Nardone
Apr 11, 2019

Thank you both for the reply. What is the benefit of going with the Stratocast solution vs the Axis free software solution, especially if I am going to use SD recording?

U
Undisclosed #5
May 29, 2019

Evan -

I missed this question previously, but when the thread got bumped just now it came up. It looks like you already have a solution in mind, but to respond to your question -

The biggest benefit is the ability to "Federate" each of the standalone sites back to a "main" or "central" system that will give full visibility and control over ALL cameras -- both those on the "main" system and those at all of the "satellite" locations that are nothing more than a single camera.

The Axis solution can certainly work for a smaller number of cameras and probably work well, but the ability to aggregate everything together and manage it centrally is a huge piece that would be missing in the Axis solution.

(1)
UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #4
Mar 21, 2019

*Hanwha Employee*

Camcloud can record to the cloud from various Hanwha cameras.

Camcloud runs as an app on the Hanwha camera.  You use your mobile phone to discover and configure the camera, send the app to the camera, etc.

 

(1)
Avatar
Sean Patton
Mar 22, 2019

Cheap, easy and functional can be a difficult trio to hit, but that also depends on what your budget is, how easy do you need the system to work, and what function does the system need to perform.

A few questions first:

If they already have cameras and access control for each site, what is the operational purpose of these 1 or 2 cameras? Do you need continuous recording, event recording, time of day limited recording? Are these to watch entrances, lobbies, dumpsters, driveways?

You are correct that Avigilon Blue, Eagle Eye, Arcules, OpenEye (among others) require an on-site appliance. The advantage to this type of architecture is generally 2-fold: the gateway or NVR provides the secure tunnel through any firewalls and over the Internet to cloud services, generally removing the requirement for port forwarding or complicated network configuration. Also, the on-site appliance typically offers some video buffering on site in the event of an Internet outage. A couple of disadvantages are having an extra piece of equipment on site (cost, management, location, power, etc), an additional single point of failure.

The camera only, direct to cloud solutions like Stratocast, Axis AVHS-powered solutions, Axis Guardian (also among others) generally also can record to an SD card within the camera, in addition to the cloud. Configuration can be more complex because each camera has to be registered and connected to cloud services, compared to one NVR/Gateway, but this complexity will vary depending on the service. 

There are also a couple of systems that provide camera hardware only with primary storage on camera using large SSD/Flash drives, and cloud as a backup from Verkada Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested and Cisco Meraki Cloud VMS/Cameras Tested. However, neither of these would generally be considered low cost, they both offer basic video analytics which performance was mixed depending on the scene lighting. Depending on your use case, they can be considered easy to use, but both are also limited to just a handful of proprietary camera options as well.

We have a listing of Directory of VSaaS / Cloud Video Surveillance Providers which lists out 20+ vendors that offer a mix of direct-to-cloud storage and onsite storage with cloud backup, with or without onsite NVR/gateway hardware.

 

 

(2)
EN
Evan Nardone
Apr 11, 2019

This is great, Sean. Exactly what I was kind of looking for. As far as the reason, these cameras would be put in areas to manage our employees on the client site. As both a provider of physical security and monitoring through our own SOC we want to start leveraging the idea of Virtual Officer Inspections, etc. These would typically be in guard shacks and gate houses. As far as recording goes, I think we would love to have continuous recording, even if that means we only have a few days on an SD card. But if we had good enough analytics with whatever system we would go with then we may decide to only record on movement, etc. even if that may be close to constant anyway if the officer is doing his job properly. 

VE
Vladimir Eremeev
Apr 11, 2019

Hi, I'm from Ivideon VSaaS team, and I think that our solution is suitable for your needs. 

There are cameras with custom FW which allows them to work with Ivideon cloud (live, archive), simple setup via web-interface or mobile app. So all you need on-site is: camera, internet access and power.

EN
Evan Nardone
Apr 11, 2019

Hey everyone, 

Thank you for the great replies. I am going to go through and respond to your ideas. This has been a great help, for sure. 

EN
Evan Nardone
May 29, 2019

I wanted to thank everyone for their input on this a while back. After talking to my integrator, and what we want to try to accomplish (using this as an internal QA program for our other security personel in client locations across the country) I am going to try a pilot using the Axis camera and software solution, with SD edge recording.

Does anyone have a suggestion for the size of the SD card needed? I won't need to record with high resolution, and I would like to have at least a few days stored provided we don't run into the Axis storage failure issues that have been mentioned elsewhere. 

JH
John Honovich
May 29, 2019
IPVM

Evan,

Here are Axis recommendations for a 1080p stream with their 256 and 128 GB cards:

While it depends on the particulars of your scene, their estimates strike me as reasonable.

(2)
EN
Evan Nardone
May 29, 2019

Perfect, Thank you John. I appreciate the information. 

New discussion

Ask questions and get answers to your physical security questions from IPVM team members and fellow subscribers.

Newest discussions