Subscriber Discussion

The Standard Trajectory Of Manufacturers From Upstarts To Antiquated

UM
Undisclosed Manufacturer #1
Mar 01, 2018

Companies in this space tend to follow a standard trajectory:

1) An upstart company, with a core group of competent engineers and salespeople with industry experience, develops a product.

2) Product sees success in a key niche.

3) Rapid growth clutters the product, technical debt inserted.

4) Company is acquired by a larger player, customer base increases further, making it much harder to fix the product's warts.

5) Founders and original engineers leave, replacements are never quite as knowledgable nor passionate about the product, making significant changes damn near impossible.

A lot of currently successful products in this business were principally developed in the mid-1990s.   The original engineers are now retired or deceased, and current teams largely are in maintenance mode.  Occasionally a push is made to overhaul the product, with a junior team with no industry experience, or with resources overseas, but high turnover dooms the effort.

Ultimately, the company acquires a another upstart company, migrates the installed base, and the process repeats.

NOTICE: This comment was moved from an existing discussion: Lenel President Is Out

(1)
(1)
JH
John Honovich
Mar 01, 2018
IPVM

#1, thanks for sharing. I made this its own discussion because it's very well put. It's an unfortunate but 'standard' lifecycle.

The only thing that I would add is that management at large acquisitive companies tend to de-emphasize product and features in favor of lower cost and more 'synerginistic' cross-selling of the once upstart product with the conglomerate's other offerings. This accelerates the competitive decline as new upstarts outdevelop the former upstart.

(1)
(1)
New discussion

Ask questions and get answers to your physical security questions from IPVM team members and fellow subscribers.

Newest discussions