Deploy Surveillance System Using Terminal Services For 7 Sites, 140 Cameras Per Site

Hi guys, I have a customer who wants to deploy their surveillance system using terminal services (or Citrix) instead of traditional workstations, they have a cluster of servers for those services and they insist it will work with no issues.

 

they want to use thin terminals instead of workstations and let the workload be done in a cluster of servers, does anyone have done this? 

They plan to deploy about 140 cameras per site and it will be seven sites for starts. 

Please your help.

Login to read this IPVM discussion.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.
** **** ** *** VMS ******** ************** ** shouldn't ** *** **** of ** *****. ********* on *** ********* ********* and ********* ******** ** the *** (** ******** decoding *** **** ** server **** ****** *********.) I **** **** ************** in *** ***** ******. The **** ******** *** the ******** ************. ***** VMS ** *** **** on *********?

******* ***** ******** ******** does *** *********** ********* they *** **** ***** virtualization.

******** ******** ** **** often **** **** ************** to ****** ****** ** desktops *** ******.

***, *'** **** **** terminal ******** ******** **** one ****** *** **** to ******* ****** *********, traders, ***. ***** ****** often ******** ******** **** in *** ******, ******** monitors ** *** **** client, ***.

* ********** *** ** think ***** **** ** that *** *******(*), ********, and ***** *** ** placed ******** *** ******* to *** "***********" **** the *******.

*** ******** ** ** thin ****** *** ****** versus *********** ** ***** about ********, *********** ****, flexible ********** (*** * consistent ********** ** *** desk), ***.

** *** ******** *** already **** **** **** route, *** *** **** unlikely ** **** **** into ********** ********* ************.

***, ** **** ** they *** ******* ** deploy *** ********* (***, GPU, ******, *******, ***.) specified ** **** *** vendor, **** ****** **** without *****.

**’* **** ** *** specify *** ****** *** product *** ************ **-***/*****-*************.

** **** ***** *** for **** *******, ** are ******** ** *** Genetec; * ** **** of *** ******* ** the *** ** *** needed ** **** ******** machine?

*** ****. *** *** displaying **** ***** ** these *********?  ******* ***** Secure ******* ******** (*** decoders)******* ****** ******* ********

** *** ** *** Genetec ********* ****** **** and **** * **** integration **** ******** ****** 5.7 *** *** *****.  

** **** ** *** our *** ********* ** virtual ********.  ** ****** OK, ***** ** **** to *** ***** **** we ****** ******** ************.  Now, **'** ***** * brand-new *** ****** *** about **** *** **** of *** ******** *************, and *** ***** ********-*********** motion *********.  **** ******** Intel *** *** ********, we *** ****** *** better ***********, *** **** 120+ ******* ** * single ********* ******, ** still **** ****** ** headroom ** *** ****.

** *** *** ****** side, ******** ************ ** also ******* *** **.  The *********** ******* ** is ****.  ********* ** what ***'** ****** ** do, *** ***/*** **** can ** ****** ****.

* **** *** ***** do ******** ************ **** some *********** *********, *** I'm **** **'* * lot **** ********* ** do.  ******* **** ****** is ******* ***** *** it.  *****, *******, *'* not **** *** **** you *** ****** **** a ****-****** ** ***** of *** ***-**** **********.  It ***** **** ****, it ***** ***.  * would ******** **** **** aware ** **** (*** that **** ***** *** quite * *** **** CPU *********** ** ***** cluster).  * ***'* ******* storage ** * ******* is ** ***** ** in * ********* *** server ******.

***********, ** **** *** into ******, **** ***** simply ****** ** **** dedicated ************ ***/** ********* hardware.  **** *** ******* x * *****, *** cost ** ************ ** recording ******** ** ******** a ********** ***** **** compared ** *** *******, licensing *****, ************, ***.

* *** ********** **** they ***** ****** **** to **** ***** ***/** additional ********** ** ***** their ******** *****, *******, there's * *** ** bang-for-the-buck ** ** *** with ******** ************.  *** can ***** ** ** with ***, *** ** ends ** ******* ***** a *** ****.  ** are ***-************** *** * lot ** ******, *** we're ** ****** ***-************** for *** ***.  ** just ***** ** **** better (*** *** **** cost) ** ********* ********.

***:  **'** ***** ********* as * ***.

**** ** ******* - it ****** **** *** are ******* ***** ****** viewing ********. ** **** is *** ****, *** next ********* ***:

*) *** **** ** the *** ******* ** you **** ** ************** view ** **** ****? (processing *****)

*) *** *** ******* viewed ******* **** ** can **** ** *** the ***** **** ******* at ***** *****? (********* and **********)

*) ** ********* ******* locally ** **** **** or ***********? (********* *************)

*) *** **** ******* do *** **** ** view ************** ** **** viewing ******* *** ** how **** ********? (****** processing *****)

**** *** ******* ************ is *****, ***** *** several *******:

*) ********* *** ******* and ******** ** ********** the ******* ******** ** the ******* ******** **** the *********** **********. *.*. viewing * ***** ** a ***** ******* - use * ********* ****** stream ****** ******* ** the ********* **** ****** does **** ****** ******** work.

*) *** *** ** the ******* ****** *********** for ***** ******** *.*. EIZO **********. **** ********* with *** ******* ******* as *****. (**** *** used ****)

*) *** * *********** video ******* **** *********** over * **** ****** protocol **** ** ****** Desktop ********. ****** ***** such * ****** (************** is ***** ********* ****) that *** ******* **** viewing ******** **** * single ****** **** ******** on-board ****. *** **** to **** ** *** quantity ** ******* ******** to ******* ***** *** cost. (******** *********** ************ for **** *******)

*) ******* ******* (***********) for **** ******* *******.

**** **** ****** ******* Protocol ********* ****** ** proportional ** *** ****** of ****** ** *** displayed ****** *** *** vary *******.

****...

 

****, 

***** *** **** *********** challenges *** ************** **** virtualizing ***** ****** ************, and ***** *** **** important *********** ******* ******** services *** ******* ******* infrastructure (***) - ********** with **** *** ***** hardware ************ *******.

** **** ********* ********* in **** **** *** would ** ***** ** discuss ** **** *** offline. **** **** ** reach ** ******** ** breich@pivot3.com 

******* 

****, **** **** **** customer ** **** ** a **** *** ****** prior ** ******* **** into **********. *** **** breaks ** **** ****** are ****** ** ****** whether **** ******* *** TS *** * **.

*** ***** **** ** use ******** ******** ******* most *** **** ************ are ****** ****  ***** web *** ****** ****  

******* ***** ***'* **** and ***** **** ** hardware  **** ** ** time ********* ** ***** or ***********.

** ******* ** **** testing ** **** *** latency ** ***** *********** that ***** *** ******* station *******.