Suggestion: Vote On Shootout Images?

Anybody think it would be cool to be able to vote or rank the images in a shootout panel on pure image quality? (Like with some little button above or below each image)*

I wonder if we all would agree? When we don't, it might invigorate more discussion, especially with new members who might not be aware of what they are looking at.

Plus it would be interesting to see if we are in sync with the IPVM line.

John, I know your concern might the fear that assigning a score to a test reduces the test to nothing but that score, but in this case since the score would not be shown until someone has decided to make their own evaluation, I think the increased interaction with the test would prevent that.

*Using the voting, polling, or quizzing libraries.

Login to read this IPVM discussion.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

********:

****:

"****, * **** **** ******* ***** *** **** **** ********* a ***** ** * **** ******* *** **** ** ******* but **** *****"

**, ** **** ** **** ************* *** *** **** ** marketing, ***** ****** ** ***** *** ****** ** ** ***** with **** ** **** **.

***** *** **. *** *** **********.

**** ******* *****, ****** **** ***** ** **** * ********* answer **** *** **** ****** *** ***.

***** ****** *** **** *****, **** *** ** ** *** right. ** *** *****, * ***** *********** *** * ****** more **** * *** *** ***** **** * *** ****, so ****'* * ****, *****?

** *** *** *********** ******, * *** **** ***** *** would ***, *** ***** ********* ****** *********? ** **** ***** new ******* ** *** *************, **** *** ** ******* ******* in ****? * ***** ******* ** ** ******* ** *** challenges *** ********* **** *** *******, ***** **** **** ************* based ** ***** **** *********** ***** ****, ***.

****** *** *** ****!

* ********* **** ** **** **** ** **** *** ********** of '*******' ** *** *** **** ****, **********. ***** **** weight ********* ******* ** *** ***** ** * ********* ***** (for *******..***** **** *********) *** ** *** ** **** * mixed ******* ******.

**** ** ******** *** ***** ** *** * '********' ** which ** ** ****** ************ *** ******* ********** *******...******** ***** are **** ****** **** ******* **** **** ** **** (** affiliation) **** **********.

**** *****, ****.

** *** ***** ***** ****** ***** ******** **** *********. ***** without **** ***** ***** **** ****** ***** ***. ******** *********** than **** ***** ****** *** ** ******** ***. ** ***** just *****...

**** ** *** *** ******** ***?

** **** *** ********...** *** ****** * ********* *******.

*** ***'* *** *** *** ****** ** *** ** *** reveal *** ************ ***** *** *** ***** *** **? * would ***** **** **** ** *** ******* ***** **** *********** if *** ** ****** ***** **** ****. **** *** ****** in **** ************ *** **** **** ** *********, *** *** tend ** ****** ***** **** ********* **** **** **********. *** may **** *** **** ***** ****** ** *** ******.

**** * *******....

...**** ** *** ******* ***** **** *********** ** *** ** reason ***** **** ****.

** ** ***** ***** ********.

******* ***** ***, ****'**! **** *** ******** **** ****** ** on...

*** * ******* ********* **** ***** *** ** ***** *** manufacturer **** **** **** *** ******, **** *** ***** ***** of * ********. ********* *****.

**********, ******** *** *** ******* ********* ** *** ****.

***, *'* ****** ******** *** *** *******, *** *'* *** sure **** ***** ** ** **** ****.

** ****-**, *********** ** *********, *** **** *** *** ******* who ***** **** *** ***? :)

* **** *** ****** *** ***** ** ****** *** *** Samsung ****.