"Security Isn't A True Profession, It's A Boneyard For The Surplus Labour Force." - Agree? Disagree?

See comment from Tony Dong:

IPVM Image

For context, this was in response to a question / poll about having a degree in security:

IPVM Image

In this context, they are talking about security managers/directors (i.e., end-users).

What do you think? The concern about security not being a 'true profession' is something that I have heard debated about for years. Fair / unfair?

Login to read this IPVM discussion.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

** **** **** ****** it *******. ***** **** always ** * **** for ******** ********. ***, if *** *** **** doing ******** ** ** end **** *** **** quickly ** ********* ** IT, **********, ***, *****, etc. ***** *** ** be ********* **** *** are ******** ** *** table **** ** ******* management, ************* ** ********** requirements **** ***** ** MTSA, *** **** *********** you **** ** **** something **** *** **** "security" ******** ** **. Whether **** ** ******* guard ******, ********** **** functionality *** ******* *******, monitoring ******** *********, ***. something **** ***** ** take ***** ** ***** to ****** **** ***** for *** ********. *** old ****** ** **** just ***** * ***** in * **** ***** is **** ******* ************ in * ***** ****** of *** ********** *** I ***** ****** ***** companies *** ***** *******.

**** ** **** ***** professions , **** *** be *** **** , labor ** *****

** ********** ** ***** required , *** ** expectation ***** **** **** , **** , ****

** **** **** **** and ******* **** , what * *******

*** **** **** * expectation ** ** ******* , *** **** ********* have ** *********** ** get ****

* ***** ******** , Security ** ********* *** many ****** ** *** life *****

*********** , *********** , future *****

**** *** **** , depends ** *** ****** ( **** ***** ) employer & *********

******** ** * ****** who ****** ****** , does ******* *** ***** like * ******** ******

**** ** * ******* position

*** ** ************** ***** both ******* **** ** expectation ** ****** ****** and ***** ** ******* , ********* ** ** with ***** ********* , this ** *********

** *** **** **** to **** ** *****

**** **** ** ** something, ** ********* , and ******* ********* ** life

*** * ****, **** in **** ********* , set *** ***** *** that ********* , *** stay ** ***** *** that *********

****** ** *** ********* in * ******* **** or *********

***** ******* *** ****** in **** ****** *** path ** *********

**** ******** * ******** , ** *** ******* , **** ** *** of *** ******** , not **** ***** ***** .

**** ** *** **** that ***, ***** * wouldn't *** ** *** on ****** *****. ******, it ***** **** **** stated ** * **** professional ******. *** ****** comment *** *** ******. Third, * **** ****** with ******** ********* ** hospitals *** ******* *****. These **** ** **************, especially *** ***** ** drugs, *** **** ******* cases *** ************ ** prosecutors. * **** **** worked **** ******** ********* that **** *** ******** vendors *** ***** **** are ** **** *******. My ***** ** * disagree. *** ***'* **** generalizations.

** ***** ** * disagree. *** ***'* **** generalizations.

* **** *** * quick ***** - *** Mr. **** ***** **** than **** * **************.

** ***** **** ** his ********:Old **** **** / *** **** ** ******, etc

--- ** ** *** knock ** **** **** his **************:Security ***'* * **** **********, it's a boneyard for the surplus labour force.

**** ** *** **** of **** ******** **** those *** ***** **** are ******* **** ******** else **** ** **** in ** **********.

...*** *** **** **** comprised ** ******-***-**** (***’*) who **** ** **** senior ********** ******* ***** attrition...

****, *** **** “******-***-****” or “******-********-***-****”?

*** ** **** ******** to ** **** ***** we *************** *** ******** ourselves.

*'* *** * ******** professional *** * *** some *********** ** **** question **** ********* **** is ********* ** ** industry. ** *****, * am * ******* ********. To **** *********/****, ** seems **** * **** make ****** ****** (**). They ***'* ********** **** I *******, ** ******* but * **** **** account *** ****** ******* flows, **** ********, *********** feasibility *** ******** *** it ******* *** ******* and ********. * ********** have ** **** **** I ******* **** *****. I ***'* **** * degree ** ****** *** even ** * ***; design ** ** ******* and ** *** *** tasks *** ** ****** that * **** ***** the ****** ******* ** much. ***** *** ********** if ** *** ********* to ******* ***** ** not * ******** *** but * **** ****** to ***** * ***********.

************************ ***** *** * part ** ** ************ that *** ********* ***** for *********** ********** (**********, military, ********** **********, *********, chemical ******, **************, ***.) are ** ** *** replaceable **** **********, *** are *** ***** ** disappear. **** ******'* *** is ** ********* ********** as **** ** ***** duties, ********* ************ *******, doing **** ***********, *** developing **********. **** ***** be ********** **** ******* else's *** *********** *** they ***** **** ******** security ********* *** ******, otherwise ***** ************ **** become * *********.