This is an odd case. Granted, scrutiny against Hikvision is rising, e.g. just this month - Japanese Chipmaker Apologizes For Supplying Hikvision and Hikvision Cameras In Norway A "Scandal" and of course a few months ago Bans Roll Across Scotland And UK Against Dahua and Hikvision.
Now, SCMP, a Hong Kong based newspaper, runs a story:
***** *** ******** ********** *********, *** camera(s) **** *** ******* ** ***** specifically ******* **** **** *********, *** because ** *** **** **** **********. However, **** *** **** ***** ** newsworthy ** ********* **** ** *** Hikvision (**** *** *** ********** **** cameras **** * *** **********, *********, is ** ** ********).
**** ******** * ****** ** * large *** ***** *** *** **** from *** *******:
***:
** ******** ** *** *** *******, these ********* *** ********* ** ***** areas ***** ** ** **** ** balance *** ****** ** *** *** is ****** ** **** ******** **** not ******** ********'* *******. ** *** other ****, **** ** *** ** raises **** ***** ******** ** *** one ******** ************.
***********! ****, **** **** ******** ********* have ****** ********* ** ****** ******* anywhere ****'* *** ******** **** *** property.
*** ***** **** ***** ************ ******* ******* ** ******** ******* ******** ********* ******* ***** ****** "* ****** ******* *** *** ******* areas".
******'* **** ********** ************ ******* ***'* **** * ****** ******* at *** **** ** ***** ** your ****, **** ** **** **** own ***** *** ******* *****:
*********, ************* **** ********** ****** (****) ******"******* ****** ***** ** ****** *****, neighboring ********** ** ***** ****** **** are *** *** ********* ****** ** the ****** ***********."