Hi all,
I tried to search for some kind of survey/article here and didn't find too much information. How typical is for integrators to use 802.1X for the IP (cameras, ACS) installs? I'm planning to start using that for all the sites, so I want to educate myself on this topic. Is there something better/newer to protect the network from unauthorized access?
*'* **** ****** ** ******* ************ access ** *** ******* *****. ** there * ****** ***?
** ***-**-*** ** *** **** ***** RTSP **** *****?
* **** ***** ** **** ** a ********* **** * *******. *** many ***** * ******** ******** *** this ******* *** *** *********** **** triggered *** **** **** ***** *** knocked **** ******* ******* **** ********* a ******(********).
*** ****** ** ***** *** ** end ********.
** ****’* *** **** ******’****** ***-**-***. **** ***********, ** *** 802.1x, **** ** **** ************** *** preventing ************ ****** ** ***** * devices/communications?
*******. * *** ******** ***** ******* gear. *** ***** ***** * ***** to ***** ************* ***** *** ****** connected ** ****** ************. *** **** option **** **** ** ** ****** you ***** *** ****** ************. ** I ******* **** ***.** ** *** only *** ** *** **** ****** the ********** ****, *** ******** ******* the ***-********** ******.
**** ****** **** ** ***** *** a ***** **** ** *** ***** of *** ******* *** ***********. ** haven't **** ** ** *** ** our *********. ******* ***, ** *** of *** ********* ***** **, ***** IT ******** **** **** ** *** it ** **********. ***** ** ** were *********** *** ********** *** ***** network *** **** **** ***** *** us ** ** **. *** ** you're **** ******* ******** ** ** camera ******, * ******'* ***** ** asking *** ** *** ** * RADIUS ******.
**'* *** *** ********** ********, *** extra ****** ********** *****'* ****** *** project **** *** ****. *****'* **** extra **** ******** *** ****, *** I ******* ******* ******** ******* ********* important ***** **** *** ** *-* years ****** **** **** **** ** mandatory.
* ***** *** **** ********** *** not * *** ****. ******* ** your ******** ********** **** ***** *** a **** ******* ** *** ****** access ** **** ***** ********* ****.
* ***** ***** *** ********. ***** are ***** ******** ******** **** *** could ***** ** ******* ** ******* the *******. ** ** #* ******, the ******* **** ******* ** **** have ***** ** **** ****** *** implementation. * ******'* ********* ** **** into **.
**, *'* ******** ** *** *** possible ******** ********. **'* * ******* approach, *** ***'* **** ********* **** because *** ***'* **** *** ** do ** ** **'* * *** more *********** **** **** ******* ****.
**** * **** "**** **** ** team ** ** **" * ******** when **-********** *** ********* **** **-*****, and ******** **** **** ****** **** analog *******. ** ** *************, *** physical ******** **** **** ***** **** the *****-******** ********** ** *-** *****, so ***** **** ** ** **-******** or ******** ******** *******. * **** to ** ***-******.
* ***** *** *** ****** *** right ********* *** **** ******* **** end ** ***** *** ****** ***.**.. my *** ** **** ***'** **** to ****** * ******* ****** *** your "******* ******" ***** **** ****** many ****** ** *** *** ***** - **** ** ********* **** ******** protection ** ******** ***, ******** ******** access *** ********* *** *** ** insecure ******** *** ******** *********. **** policy ***** **** **** ***** * range ** ***** ******** "*******" ****** ie. ********** **** **********'* ******* **** going ** ****!
* *** ***** *** *** ****** from *** ******** ** *** ******** of ********** **** ** **. *** IT ********** ** ****** ** * dilemma ** ****** ** ****** * system *** *** "***" **** ******. In *** **** ***** **** ** that **** ****** *********** *** ******** with *** ******** ******. * **** worked **** *** ***** ******** (* Regional ************) ***** ** ********** ** responsible *** ******** *** ******** *******. Over **** **** **** ********** *** integrator **** *** **** ***** **** design *** ***** ******* *************.
** *********** *** ******* *********** ** securing ***** *** ********, ***** ** a **** ********* ******* ** *** IT **********. *** ** ********** * worked **** *** *** **** ** putting *** ******** ****** ** ***** Radius ****** **** ******** ***** ** interruption ** *** ****** ******* ****** down *** ******** *******. **** ******* the **** ** ** ********** *** own ******** ****** ****** *** * wasn't *********** ****** ****** **** ** so * *** ** ****.
***** *** **** ********* **************** **** ** ** ********** ***** the ******** *** *** ******** *******. The *********** ** *** **** *** us (**********) ** * ********!
****'* * ****, ** **** *** own ****** ****** **********. * **** it *** *** ************* ******. ***** now * *** "******" *********** ********** on * ****** ******, *** * want ** **** ******* ******** ****************.
*'* ******** * ***** ********* ***** (policy, ** *** ********* *****), *** I **** ** **** ** ** a ********* **** ** *** ************ standards. ***, ** ********** ****, ******* to *****-******** (********** *****, ***, ***/***, firewall *****, ****-*****, ***-****, ***, ***.) is ****** ***** *** ******** ** me, *** ***.** ******** ** *** only ***** * **** ***** **** before.
**'* ********** * ****, **** **** and ****. **'* *** *** (*********) enterprises ***/** ********** ***********. ***** **** means ** ***'* **** ******, ** there *** ***** **** ** ****** networks. **** *** *** ********** **** perfect, **** **** ********** *** ***** papers, **** *** **** *** ********* to ** *** ****, *** **** have *** ******* *'* *** ****** to **** ** **'* ******* ***** is * *** ****. ****** *** a **** ***** ** *** ********** but ******* * ********* ****** **** most ******* *** *****'* **** ** it ** *******. **** **** **** Panisonic, ******* *** *****. *********** **** can *********** ** ** *** ********** able ** ****** *** ** *** possibly ****** * *******. *********, *** IT ********** **** ******** ** **** to ** **. ** *** ******** your **** *** ** ** ****** the ***** ** **** *** *** work ******* ***** *** *****.
******, **** *** *** *** ** doing **** **** ***.**/ ****** ****?
***** ** *** ** * ***** here *** *** **** ***.** **** finally ****** **** ****** ** *** industry **** *** **** *** *****. Cisco ******** **** **** * ******* called ****-******** *** **** **** * "mac-address ******" ****** **** ********* **** - **** ******* *** **, *** this ******* *** ** **** **** the ******* *** ******* ** *** port. ** * *** ***** ******* the ****** *** ***** ********* **** it **** ** **** *****-******** *****. Super **** ** ***** ** ********** to ***.** *** ***** *** ******* advantages ** ***** ****-***** ***.** ** well.
** ****** - ** ******* * way ** ******* *** ****** ***** the ******* ******* *** ********* ** 802.1x. **** * **** ** * demo ***** (*+ ***. ****) **** shows ** ******* **** ***** *********. We **** *** **** ** ******* "backdoors" ** ****** *******.
*** ** **** ** *** ***** like ** ******* (*****@****************.***)
*****
Ask questions and get answers to your physical security questions from IPVM team members and fellow subscribers.
** *****. ** **** ******** *** link **** *** *** ****** ** the ******. *** ****** ** ***** end ** *** ********. ** **** requires **** ******* ****** ********** (****: your ******** ****** ****** *******.) ** also ******** **** ****-*** ************** *** more ******* ************* ** *******.