Subscriber Discussion

Moody's Drops Hikvision Rating For Unspecified "Business Reasons"

Avatar
Charles Rollet
•May 20, 2022

Moody's has withdrawn its credit rating for Hikvision over unspecified "business reasons", it announced on April 21:

IPVM Image

*****'* *** *** **** *** ******* explanation **** *** ** ******** *********. In ******** *****, *****'********* **************'* ******, ****** ** ** "**" - ***** ******* ****,**'* *** **** ********* ******* *****, *********, ******, *** other ****** *****.

*****'***** *********** *********, ******* ********* *** "******** reasons" ****** ** *****'* ******** *******, not ***** ** *** ***** ******, and **** *** ******* **************** ********:

**** *** [*****'* ********** *******] ********* that * ****** ****** *** ********* for “******** *******,” **** ****** **MIS's ******** *******, *** *** ******** ******* ** *** ***** ****** ** *******. ***'* ******** ******* ********* ** not ******* *** ******** ***** *** Rated ******'* **************** ** *** ******* of *** **********.

**** ***** *****'* ********** *** *** withdrawal **** ***** *** ******* ** was ******* ** ** ********* ******* Hikvision. *** ***** ***** *****'* **********,*** ********* ***** ************ *** ** *** ******* ************* "hard-hitting" ********* ** *********. *******, *****'* did *** ******* ** ****'* ******** for *******.

(1)
RS
Robert Shih
•May 20, 2022
Independent

*** ****'* *********'* ********? * **** to **** *** ****** **** ***** everything **.

(1)
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #1
•May 20, 2022
In reply to Robert Shih

**** *** ***** ** **********!

***'* ***** *********, *****:

  • ****** ******* *******
  • ** ********* ******
  • ****** ***** ********
  • ** *** ** ********* *** **** as *** ** *** *****
  • ********? **, *** **** *** ***** in *****? ***** ***** ** **. And ** ********** ******* ******** *****.
  • *** ** ** **** ***********; *****'* no ********* ****'** ******** ***/********
  • ********* **** *** **** ** ***** code ****
  • ********** **** **** ** *** ******* on ** ******** ******* *** **'* not * *******, ***. (** ******, we'll ***** ****** **** ** ****-*******)
  • **** ****** %#@&! ****** ******* ******** a ****** %#@&! ******** ** *** filthy %#@&! **** *******

***** ** ***** **** **** ** which ****** ****'** ***...

(* ********* *** *** ****** * photoshopped ***** ** *******, *** *'* sort ** ** *** ***** ***** now)

(1)
(1)
JH
John Honovich
•May 20, 2022
IPVM
In reply to Undisclosed Integrator #1

*** **** ******** ***** * *** of *** **** ******* *******, ******, for ********, *** ****** ** **** typically:

********? *** ***** ** ***** **** everyone ****** *** *** ******? ***** we *** ********* **** ********** ********?

New discussion

Ask questions and get answers to your physical security questions from IPVM team members and fellow subscribers.

Newest discussions