Measuring Minimum And Maximum Bandwidth Consumption
I'm about to start an experiment where the minimum and maximum bandwidth consumption of a couple of different camera models will be measured. For that, I'm considering two different scenarios:
1) Minimum bandwidth consumption: Cameras placed indoors with a Lux value above 1000 and facing a white wall with no movement whatsoever.
2) Maximum bandwidth consumption: Cameras placed indoors with a Lux value below 5 and facing a white wall while a mini laser stage lighting device projects erratic pulses of light on the wall. (Pretty much the same idea used by you, John, in your experiments).
Frame rate values, CODECS, and image quality values will be varied during the experiment. My question: am I missing something or the experiment above is the way to go?
Kind regards, Tiago
Login to read this IPVM discussion.
** ****,
***** *** ***** ********* *** ******* ******. * *** *** thought ***** **** ******! * **** **** ****** *** *** to ** ***** ** ******** ** *. *** **** ***** the ***** **** ******* ** **** ***** *** **** ********* of ********.
****** *** *** **** ** *** **** ******. ***** *****!
*****
*****,
*** **** ***** *** ******** * **** **** **** ** pure ***** **** *** ********. ** ********** ** **** **** brightness **** ***** ** **** ** *** *******, ******** *** light ******** ***** *** *** **** ******, *** ** *** noise.
** *** **** *** *** *** ** * '**** **** area', **** ****** **** ******* *******. *** ********* **** ********** decrease *** *** ***** **** ** ******* *********. *** ****** **** ******.
*** ** *** *** *** ****** ** * ***** **** you **** ******* ******* *** *** ***** **** **** ** totally *********. **** *****.
****** *** ****** ** * ***** **** ** * ***** for ******* ** ** ** ***** *******, ********* ** ******, all ********** ************ *** *****. ******* *** **** ******* ** a '**** **** *****' ** *********** *** ********** ** ******* the ****** ***.
******* ... *** ***** ***** ******* ** * "******" *********** that ***** ***** * *****-**** ** *** ** * **** proxy *** **** *********** ? *.*. *********** ***** ********, ********** air ******** *** ***** **********, ******* ** ***** ******** ?
***, *** ** ** **** ****** ** *** ** * higher ******* **** * ****** **** ** ***** *** ** noise (********* ********* ** ***). ** ***** *** *******. * contend ** ****** **** **** *** ****, ***** *** ***** won't.
**** *** ** **** *** = * ******** ** *****, accompanied ** **** *******. **** *** ** **** *** *** = ******* *******. ***, * *****.
** ** ****, "**** **" *** *** ****** **** ** "Off".
*********, ****** *** *** **********. *** *** **** ** *********, I'll **** *** *** ******** ********* ** ****. **** *'** finished *** **********, *'** ****** *** ******* **** ** **** thread.
* ***** **** ** ******* **** *** ***** ** *** wall ** ********** ** ** ** **** ** ** ** uniform ****** *** ******'* ***** ** ****. ** *** ** I ********** * ***** ***** **** ********** * * * containing * **** ******** ** ****** **** *** **** ***** (that **, **** *** **** *** ************** *** *** ***** depth) **** ** ****** ** ******** **** * ***** ***** containing ********* ******.
* ********** ****'* ******* ********* * **** **** **** ****** the ****** *** ** ******* "********" ***** ***** ** ** or ****** ***** ******* *** ******'* ******. ** *** ***** hand * **** ********** **** *** ****** ****** ***** ** create * **** ***** (******) ***** ** *** ***** **********, which *** ****** ** * ***** ***** ***** **** ** compress. *********, *'** ********** **** ****'* *********** ** **** ** be **** *'* ********* **** ******* *** ******* ********* ***********.
**** ****, ****** *** ******* *** ******** *****.
* ***'* **** ** **** ***** **** ******** (**** **** of "*******" *** *** ******* ***), *** ** *** ********** cameras ***** ** *** ***** **** **** ********** ************ (***) video. **'* **** * *** ***** ***** * ******* **** this, *** ** *** ********* ** **** ** ** **** new ****** ** ** ******* ** *** * "***** ****" continuous ******* ********* ***********.
****** ** *** ** *** *** ********* ********* ***, *** for ****** ******* ******* **** *** *** *******.
**** *** *** ******* ******** **** *** ********** ********, **** as * ****** **** ***** * ** ***** *** * 2 ** ********** **********. *** ***** **** *** *** *** one **** ** * **** **** * ********** ****-********* ******. As *** ******* ****, **** ******** ******** **** ****** ******* patterns, ***** ** *** *** **** **** **** ************ *****.
***, ** *** ****** **** ** ****** ***** ************ *** video *** **** ******* *** **** ** ****** *** ****?
** ***, ****** *** **** *****.
** *** ******** ********** ** ********* ********** ***** ******* (***** that ** *** **** ****** ******** ** ***** ************). *** goal ** ** **** *** **** *** ***** *** **** case ********* *** **** ******* ** ********* ***********. *** ****** for **** ** ********* ******* ********* *** ******* ************.
*** ***** **********, * *********** *** ******* ** *** **********.
*** **** ********** ** **** ***** ********** *** * ****** impact ** *** ****. *** ***** **** ********, * ***** dark **** **** * **** ***** ***** ******** ****** ********** erratic ****** ** *****, ********* * *** **** ************ ******* than *** **** **** ********, ****** ** ***** *** ** activity ********** ** *** ****. *-**** *** **** *** ******* 4 *** * ***** ******* ******* *.*** *** ******* ** and ** *****. ** ** ***** ********** **** **** *.*** outperformed *-**** ********* *** **** ** *** *****. ***** **% bandwidth ******* ** *** **** **** ******** *** ***** **% in *** ***** **** ***.
** ** **** *********** ** ********* **** *** ********* ****** models **** ** *** ********** *** **** ****** ** *** rate. *** **** * ****** *** * ******* *** **** than *** * ******. *** ********** ** **** *** ******* image ******* ******* ** *** * ****** *** ********* ** do **** ****: ***** *** ***** (*/*” *********** **** *** CMOS), ***** (*********** **** *** **** */*”), *** ***** (*********** scan *** **** */*.*”). *** * ****** ********* **** *****, which *** ******* ****** *** **********, *** ** * ****** of **** *** ******** ***** ******* ****** ** ******** (********* therefore ** * ******* ********* ***********).
** ****** ******* ******* ***********/***********, ** *** ******** ** *** me.
*****, *******, ****** ** **** *** *******! **'** **** *** same ******* *** * ** * ****** (**** ** *** ****** ********). * ** ******** ********* ** ****** *** ******* * pattern ** **** ** ***** *****, ******* ****** ******, ***** only ******* ** ************, **** *** ****. ** ***** * consistent *********** ********** ** *******? ** ********* **** * ********** want ** ** *** *** ** ****** *******.
Newest Discussions
| Discussion | Posts | Latest |
|---|---|---|
|
Is There Any Facial Recognition That Could Just Keep A List Of Individuals? Not A Cross Reference DB
(7)
Started by
Truman HW
|
7
|
less than a minute by Truman HW |
|
Started by
Mick Brown
|
35
|
less than a minute by Michael Miller |
|
Started by
John Honovich
|
25
|
less than a minute by John Honovich |
|
Started by
Truman HW
|
13
|
less than a minute by Undisclosed Manufacturer #2 |
|
Started by
RJ Spurr
|
4
|
less than a minute by John Honovich |
** *** *** **** ***** ** ** *, ***** ***** be **. *** ****** ***** **** (** **** ** *** strobe ** ****** ****) ****** ******** *** ********* ****** ** a **** ****** *****.
*** ***** *** * ***** *** ** *** *****. ** under * *** *** ******* *********. **** **** **** *** the ******'* **** ******** *** ******** ****** ** **** ******* conditions. * *** ** ******'* ********* *********** ***** ** ** this ******** *** *** ****** ***** *********. **** ***** **, make **** *** ****** *** ******* ****** ** ** ********** and/or *********** *** **** ******. *** ********* ****** ******** *** ****** *** ******** ** ********* *****.
****'* *** ***** **** **** ******: