LinkedIn Has Been Hacked

LinkedIn has been hacked and 117M user accounts are being shopped by the alleged assailants.

We should all change our passwords ASAP, but do we stop there? Since it is apparent that LI doesn't have the ability to secure our data, should we close our accounts and cease usage of LI? Should we sue them for the breach? Do they have a hacking clause? Would it...

**** ** **** *** ******** ** ****? ***** *** ****/***** of *** *** ****** **** *******? ***** *** ** **** or **** ******** ******* **** *** **** ****** ** **?
Login to read this IPVM discussion.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

* *** ****** **** * ******** ******* ** *** **** at ****, * ****** ****** ** ******* **** **** **** changed ************ ************ **** * ***** **** ** ***** ** ** ** order ** ********... ***** **** *** *** ***** ***** *** privacy ********** * **** **... *** ****** * *** ******* from ******** *** ** ***** "********" *******:

********

** ******* ** *** ********** **************, *******, ******** *** ********** measures ** ********* **** ******** *********** ******* ****, ***** *** unauthorized ******, *** *** ************. *************, ** ******** *** ** guaranteed ** ******* ***% ********. ***********, ** ****** ********* *** security ** **** ***********.

**** *** ** ******** ** ******* ****** **** ****** ******* my ***********? * ********* ** ******* *** *** **** ****** all ** *** ******** *********** ******** ** ** *******... ***** then * **** ****** * *** ******* ***** * ****** cc *** ***** ******* ** ** **** *********** **** ****** it ***'* ** * ***** *******... **** ** ******* *********? in ** **** *** ******* **** **** ******* ** ******** that ** *********** ** *** **** ***** ** ***** **********... i **** ***** **** ******** **** **** **** **** ********* steps ** ******* **** ** **** ** **** *** *** i **** **** *** ************** ** ** *** ****...

***** ** ******** *** **** *** ****** ***** *** ********* thread **** *** **** ******* ** *** *** **** **** rather **** **** *** *** **** *** ******* ** ********* to ****...

***** * ***** **** ******** *** *********** ***** *** *************, did *** **** ** *** **** *** *** ***** ******* of **** ****, ** *** ** **** *** *******?

** ***** ** ****, ** *** **** **** ****** **** because ******* (*** ***) **** ***** *** ******? ** ** you *** ***** *** ********* **** *** **** ******* ********? Would *** **** ** ******?

* ***** ****** ********* ** **** ****** *** **** **** blinders ** **** ** ***** ** ******. ** *** **** that ******* ** ** *************, **** ********* *** **** *** same ***** ****, **?

***** * ***** **** ******** *** *********** ***** *** *************, did *** **** ** *** **** *** *** ***** ******* of **** ****, ** *** ** **** *** *******?

** *** **** *** *******, * **** ******** ** ********* information *********... ** ***** ********* **** *** *** **** **** my *********** ****'* ****** * ***** ******* *********** *** **** a *** ** ******* ** ***********...

** ***** ** ****, ** *** **** **** ****** **** because ******* (*** ***) **** ***** *** ******? ** ** you *** ***** *** ********* **** *** **** ******* ********? Would *** **** ** ******?

* ******'* *** * **** **** ******, **** **** **** i **** ** ****** ** *********** ***********... * ***'* **** at ******.

* ***** ****** ********* ** **** ****** *** **** **** blinders ** **** ** ***** ** ******. ** *** **** that ******* ** ** *************, **** ********* *** **** *** same ***** ****, **?

**** ***** *** ** ******* ***** ****** ***** ******** * use **** *****'* **** *** *** **** ******** ** ******* to ******* *********** *** ***** ******, **** ** ***** *** though * **** ***** ** **... ** ** ***** ******* that **** ** ** **** ** ** *** *** * am **** **** ****... ** *** ** **** * ***'* use ***** ******* ** * ****** ******* ** ****.

**, *** ***** ** ****, *** ********, *****'* **** *** mention ** ******* ******** ** ***** **** ** *&**, *** are ******* *****?

** **, **** ** *********. * ***** ***** **** *** the ****. ** *** ***'* ***** ******* **** **** ****, how ***** *** ******** ***** ******? *'* *** ******** ** for ******* ****, *'* ****** ** **** **** ** **** crucial, *** ***** ***** *** ***** ****** ** *******.

***** ******* **** **** *** ****** ********* ** ******* ******** and *******?

"**************, **** ** **** *** ******** ******? ***** *** ****/***** ** *** *** ****** **** *******? Would *** ** **** ** **** ******** ******* **** *** been ****** ** **?"

** ** *** **************

** *** ******

**** ****, **** **** ** **** ***/**** ****** ****** *** online ********.

* ***** ** ***** ******** ** *** **** ******* **** breached * ***** *******, ***** ** ******** *** *********, ******* all ***** ** .*** ***** *** *** * ****** ** other ****** ****** ** ***** *** * ***** ** ***** to ******* ** *** ****** (*** **** ***** *******) ** update ***** "****" ****; ** ******* ** ****.

*** ****** *** *** ** **** ******** **** *** ******** of *** ***** *******, ** *** *******, ** *** ** that. **** * **** ******* *** * ***** ** ****.

** * ***** ****** *** **** ** ****** *** ****** and ***** ** *** ****** (***** ** **** ***** *** will *** ** ***** ***** **) ****** ******* ****** ******** reactions ****** ***** ** ******* **** * **** *** "******."

** *** ** ******** **** * ***** ***. ** *** a ****** **** ******, ********* ****** *** ** ****** **** information ****** *********/ ******************. ** ********** *** ******** ******* **** ****** **** ******** but * **** *** ****** ************.

** **** *********** ******* *** ******* ** **** **** *** forced ******** *********, ** * **********.

**** != ****

***'** *****. **** **** ******** ****. ** *** ****** * years *** **** ** *** ******. ** ** **** *** that *** ****** **** ** ***** ******.

*** *** ****** **** *****'* ******?

* *** ********* ** ****

*** *** ****** **** ** ** ******** ******* ** ******* documentation **** **** - ** ** ******** ******** - **** access **.... **** **** ** **** *** ******** * '****'?

* ** ***.

* ** *** ******, ** * ****:

**** != **** ** **** <> ****