Is It Misleading For Milestone To Call Their VMS 'Xprotect'?

I hate to sound biased, but can't we all find issues or claims of the opposing vendors claims and cry foul or claim a marketing statement is "Misleading". Last I knew "XProtect" is simply a registered trademark of Milestone and has no technical bearing of the technology and protocols for which they are claiming. I'm not bashing, just saying if something works, call it whatever the marketing team decides. These forums are supposed to be educational, and informative and the undertones are annoying.

So for the private post....

NOTICE: This comment was moved from an existing discussion: Milestone Vs Avigilon - Remote Viewing Bandwidth Usage

Login to read this IPVM discussion.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

*** ****** ** ***** ******.

*** *** *********** ********* *** ****** ***** *** '********'??? ****'* **** ******* ********* ** ******** ****** ***** *** 'Control ******'. **** *** ******* ***** *** ****** ******* **** at ****. * ***'* *** * ****** ** ****** ** either.

****** ******** ** * **********, *** * ***** ******* **************, not ****** * ***** ****, **** *** ****** ***** **** it ** *** **** ** ****.

**, * *****. ** ********** ** ********** *** ********* *** one ************ ** **** ** ********* **** ******* **** ******* they ******* ** ***** ** * **** ******* **** *****. I ***** **** *** **** ********** ******** ***** ** *** all ************* ** ** ****** ** ***** ** ***** ******** by **** ******. ******* ** "********", **'** **** ** "***** Surveillance ********* ******** ******* *******-*" ** ********.

******, **** ** *** **** **** ********, * ***** ***'** agree.

-**** **** ** ****** ****************** ****** ******** ** *********

******** *******-* ** * *******, * ****** *** *******-* ******** myself...

*** *** *******-* ******* **** *** * ****** ********** ************* crash ** *******!

**** ****, *** ** *** **** "*************". **** ****** *** NCC1701-E *** **** **'* **** ***** ** ************* (**** ***** trying ** ********** **** *********, ******** ***** *********** **** ******** and *********** ******* **'* ****), *** * *** ***** *** resiliency ******* ***** ******* *** ******* *** *** ***** ******* with **** ******* ******* ** **** ********* ********. **'* **** going ****** *****.

******.

**'* ******* *** ****!*** ***?!?

* *** ******** **** ** ****** * **** * **** baked *********** ******* ** ********* ** ******* ** ***** ***********, and *** **** **** ** *** *********** ********* ** * basic ******** **** ***** ** * **** **** *********** *** a ****** **** * **** ** **, ***'* *** *** all ****** ****** ** **** **** *********** ** ** **** to **** ********** ********, ***** *** **** ****** ** ** complaint ***** ******** *** ****** ** ************ *** ********.

***, *'* ****** ** **** ** *** ****** ** ** knowing *** ****** **** ****** ***** ***** *** ********* ******** of *** **** ******** ** ***********. ** ******* *** ******* our ********* ***** ** **** ** **** ****, *** *** willing ** ***** ****** ** ********* *** *******. ***'* *** make *** ******* ***** **** ******** ** ****** ** **** and ******* *** ** *** ***. ********* ******* * ** B, ** ** *********** ***** ** **** ****.

**** ******* ** ***** ******** ****?

*** ** ******** **** ** '************ *** ********'?

*****.*, * *.* *** **********, ***, ** ***** ***** ***** around ** ** **** *** **** **** ** ****** ********, that *** *** ** ****** **. ** *****.* ** * derivative ** **** *** *** ****** *****, ***** ****** ** going ** *** ***** *** **** ** **********, ****'* ****** advancement. * ***** ** ***** ** *** ***** ** *****, and * **** *** ******* ** ********** *** ***** ********* not ** ***********. * ** ***** ******* ********** *** **** differences, ****** *** **** **********.

*** * ******* **** **** ******?

*** **** ******* *** ******* *********, ******* ***** *************** ***** various *********. ** *** **** **********, *** ********* ** ************ JPEG2000 *** *** ********* **** *.*** (**** *****-*********). ****'* *** point ** *** ******** **********.

******* ****** ***** **********.* ***** *.*** ***. ** *** ** *** **** ** ***********, ****** **** discussion *** ***** ** *** ***** ****+ *********** *** *** 2900+ ********.

** **** **-'** *** *******...

** *****.* (*********** ****) ** * ********** ** ***, **** so ** **, *** ********* ** ********* ***** ********* ********** might ***** **, *** *** **** ******* ** ** **********, has * ******** *********. *** ******** *****.* *** ** ******** of ******* ***********, *** ** *****.* ****** ******** ** ***, and *** **** ** ******* ** ***** ******* ***** ** nothing ********** ***** ****. *** ********* ******* **** * **** job ** ********* ***** *** ** * ******** *****, *** the ***-*** **-***, *** ***** *'** ****** ***** *** *******'* freedom ** ******** *** ***** ** *** ***** *** ************ to ***** ************. ******* *** ********* ********* ***** **** *.*, they've ************ *** ***** *.*** *** **********, *** ******* * proprietary ********* ** ******* ****** *** ******. * **** ******* on ***** *** ******://***.********.***/****/**/**/*******-**-*-***-***/*** ******** *******.

******* *** ********* ********* ***** **** *.*, ****'** ************ *** basic *.*** *** **********, *** ******* * *********** ********* ** further ****** *** ******...

**** ********* ****! ***** ********* **** *** **** ** **** the *** **********? ***** ***** *** ********** ** *** ****, like -*, ** ********* ****? ***** **** ***** ** ** what **** ** *** "*********** ********* ** ******* ****** *** frames"? ******* *******/*********** **** **** *******...

*** ***** ****** ** **** ******, ** **** ** *** together:** ******** ************ *.*** ***?

"*'** ****** ***** *** *******'* ******* ** ******** *** ***** up *** ***** *** ************ ** ***** ************"

**.

**** ** * ***** **** *** * ******* *******, **?

** ***** *** * ****** ** ******** * ****** ** "Pointless ********** ** *** ****", * ***** ***** ** ** this ******. **'* *** **** ***** (** **) **** ** being ********* ****.

**, *** ***'* **** * "**** **** ****** ** **** or ****** *******" ******?

******'* ****** *******: ******** ****** ** ***** ***** '******** *********' against ********, ********.

******** *********? *** **** ******* * ********* ****? **** ** the ***** * *** **** ***** ******** ***** ** ****** the ******* **********, *** ******** **** ** *** ********* ********. Considering *** ***** ************* **** ***** ** **** ****, ****'* the ******* ***** ** "**** ******" ****** ** ***** ** get.

****'* **** * **** ******* **** ******** *******. **** ** say ********* ******** ***** ********, **** *** ******** **** ******* (*,****) ** **** **** ***** *** ******** ********, ******* ******* obviously **'* ********. ** ** *** ********* ********, ** *** biased, ********, ***********, ***.

*'** **** ** *** ********** **** *** ******** ** *** criticism ** ******** *** **** ** *** ********** ******* ** exclusively *** *** ******* ** *********** *** ******** *************.

*, *** ***, **** ** ****** ************. **’* **** ** online ******* ** **** *******, ******* *** ****** *******. ** I **** ***** *********, * *** ******* ***** ******* ******* flying ** **** **** ** *** ***** *** ****** *** biased *** ***. ** * *****, * **** **** ***** fascinating. ***** ******** ** ******** ** ** ********, **** *** like *** ***** ************ ********** ** *********.

[* - ** **** *******, *’* ***** ******* *******’* ********** #2 - ***********:* ******* ******* ********, ********, ** ****** ** ** ************ (as * *********** ** ********* *****). * ** ** ** way *********** **** ******** ******* *** **********.]

"***** ******** ** ******** ** ** ********, **** *** **** the ***** ************ ********** ** *********."

**.....

**** *** ** **********. **** ****** ** * ********** ** another *********** ** ** *** ********** ******* **** ***** ** adopting *** * **** *.*** *** **********. ** ******** *** public ************ ************ ******* **** **********?

* *** '***********' **** **** ******* '*'************** *** *.*** *****-********* **** * ****** '**********' ***** ** misleading. ********** *****.

** ******** *** ****** ************ ************ ******* **** **********

*********** ***** ** ***non ' the ethics and efficacy of this have been debated ****.

** *** ***** **** ** ** **** ********** *********:

********** *** ******** ** ******** ******* ****** *** *** ****** generation ** *************** ********** ****** ********** ********** (**** *.*)

**** ** *** ** *** ****** ******? ******'* **** ** under ******** ** **** *. (*** *. *** **** ******), maybe *** ***** ******* ****?

******* ******** ***** ** **** ** ********:

**** ******** ***** ** *** ******** ** “****-******,” **** ** clear ********** ******** **** ** “***-**-***” ******* ** *** **** term. *** **** **** ****Avigilon *** ** ***** ******** ******* on its technology.

******* **** ** *** ****** *** ***** *********?

******: **** ******* *** **** ***** ** *** *** **********:** ******** **** ******** ********?