"IPVM Is Run By A Bloviating Industry Drop-Out Who Couldn't Make It In The Main Stream."

Last week, we had Person Sends In IPVM Sucks Video. This week, we have a guy who started a LinkedIn group against IPVM, declaring:

IPVM Image

About this group:

IPVM is run by a bloviating industry drop-out who couldn't make it in the main stream. Do your own homework and if you're an analyst member of the media or investor, PLEASE have the common sense to hire a professional to consult with. Don't depend on IPVM's uneducated rhetoric.

I don't know much about Goldring but he evidently carries SIA CEO Don Erickson's endorsement:

IPVM Image

Agree
Disagree: 1
Informative: 4
Unhelpful: 1
Funny: 5

That is a college level advanced English article, and by a man who I assume speaks Danish and English as a second language. Impressed.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Just make sure it's a hill you want to die on. Lots of "missions" are misguided.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Third poll option: WGAF. Eat whatever you find tasty.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

WOW

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Our company subscribes to this service because it provides an opportunity to obtain current information on the industry. The scope of its' coverage has expanded significantly over the years. For the most part it appears that IPVM authors always attempt to present the most accurate information they can. It appears that they consistently provide those about whom the articles are written, the chance in advance to comment on or contribute information prior to a story being released. When released all information presented in articles appears to be as objective as possible, with the exception of course, of articles clearly expressing personal opinions, as in some of the recent articles on Human Rights violations in China. Even so, all articles provide the opportunity for an identifiable or anonymous response from any reader,

The history of IPVM articles are available for review and stand on their own. Check them out.

From my point of view, this is the only 'real time' publication that exists and is available to the entire industry, and any others willing to subscribe. They state reliance on subscriptions for its' existence, and do not accept advertising. All other industry publications I know of are free, and there health and existence rely entirely on obtaining advertising and support from service or product suppliers. This can make it hard to always be objective. We have found that the variety of articles and subjects available in IPVM have more than justified that subscription fee for our company.

Objective information can only based on facts on hand, and since others may have relevant information, all articles provide the opportunity for input from the actual subjects of its articles, or any reader who has an opinion or something to contribute. In my over 45 years in this industry I am not aware of any other industry publications that are doing the same. Best of all, in spite of personal attacks on its' authors, no sign of cancel culture here.

Sometimes information presented may hit a nerve, or perhaps expose a truth that makes another uncomfortable. Fortunately, the person on the other end can defend themselves, present their case, and correct wrong information if they wish.

Not surprisingly, in the absence of actual data or truth, the only response some can offer is a personal attack in the form of personal insults, or unjustified slander. If you don't agree with something, provide your opinion. If there are facts add to the discussion, present them. If your feelings are hurt, explain why. Provide data to correct wrong information, and get the truth out. Sometimes truth may strike a nerve, affect your business, your market, or your job. If so, use the forum provided to present a rebuttal. Truth stands on its' own.

I do not know John, and have not always agreed with his opinions, but I believe he and the other IPVM contributors always do their best to present the truth. He presents each article always available for review, critique, and judgement by anyone willing to share their opinion. He doesn't rest on credentials or his past accomplishments, and instead provides the opportunity with each new article the opportunity for him to be newly judged, graded, and commented on by the readers. Anyone can present a public or anonymous response. He has always seemed willing to have an open and public discussion with anyone. I know of no other network or news vehicle which provides that sort of access across to all readers.

As a writer or journalist reporting information, he would not survive long if he cared about being liked, but it seems as if he makes every effort to be as objective and truthful as possible. I don't subscribe or read this publication because I like or don't like him. I am interested in the information, reviews, company, and new product overviews. It is good to hear about new products, and have a forum to discuss ideas an opinions. Not all comments are written by those in our industry, not all are objective, and some clearly have a bias, but that helps create a real discussion.

You don't have to like him or the other contributors. Every reader is allowed to agree or disagree. If expressing our opinions doesn't get the results we want, each person has a more powerful tool. We can exercise our choice to not subscribe. If we don't believe something is worthy of our hard earned dollars, we don't have to buy it. Of course unsubscribing has a down side.. We are no longer able to respond with personal insults when we read an opinion for which we do not have a legitimate response.

The good news is that historically from all the articles I have read, the majority of harsh or nasty responses I have seen in forums were from individuals working for companies that were taking heat for a product problem, policy problem, quality problem, or ethical problem. The source is fairly obvious because they never provide any data or facts in defense. Their only response is to resort to personal attacks and insults almost always anonymous yet which are always published. Can't be more fair that that.

Agree: 2
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

Honestly, I forget. While I am very keen to understand contrary views, I don't really care about people calling me names.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

It is a linked-in group. I already requested to join. Should be fun.

John, what did you do to piss off Peter Goldring?

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

circling back to this thread cuz someone posted on it today.

imo, this was the best line in the whole thread.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

You should definitely join:).

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Someone just messaged me about this group, evidently the group has doubled to 4 members:

IPVM Image

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 2

You can keep yhe Hawaiian Pizza but send me some of that Loganberry pop.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 1

I find IPVM useful - informative and up to date professional and very useful.

The whole team do a fantastic job in highlighting products or issues we would not otherwise hear of and introduce products we might otherwise never see.

Thank you IPVM for all the great information you provide.

Please keep all the great information coming!

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 1

Or, are you from Southern Ontario, the obvious birthplace of Hawaiian Pizza.

Full disclosure, I grew up in Western NY and spent many summers in Crystal Beach, Ontario, leaving me with fond memories of Hawaiian Pizza washed down with Loganberry pop.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Maybe time for a serious poll........ Pineapple on pizza yes or no

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Okay, that...that was kinda funny.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Contact

It sounds as if this group has provided the ‘hater’ more time on the subject than deserved.

BUT, the great thing about this country, is that everyone is provided the right to share their thoughts and ideas, even if not popular.

It seems possible that there are also a lot of individuals getting paid to work who are contributing to this form of social media instead. I can’t say that as a owner I would mind if our people were doing so, however I do not believe most would pay for the cost of the subscription. Hey, does that make this an ‘elite’ publication?

Then again, maybe I need to check our company credit card bills. I may have some on here after all.

Have fun guys ..

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Put some green pepper on there too. Then you have a masterpiece.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

I don't think we have a company stance on pineapple on pizza. It's not anything I would ever ask for, but the sweet/salty combo of pineapple and pepperoni (not ham) works. I'd rather eat almost every other variety of pie, though.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

But if I ever find out IPVM is pro Pineapple on Pizza…

aka “Hawaiian Pizza”, aka “Birthplace of IPVM” ?

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 1

Hold on a second now. What’s wrong with pineapple on pizza???

Agree: 1
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

IPVM is very opinionated.

This is true and nothing wrong with it. What they base their opinions on matter. Objectivity and transparency also matter.

I disagree with John and some others on one thing in our biz right now. Such is life. That doesnt take away from the vast majority of the rest of what IPVM has to offer.

But if I ever find out IPVM is pro Pineapple on Pizza I will move to revoke his Bruddah Card. There are some things that are unforgiveable.

Agree
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 1

"I believe that industry thought leaders run in small circles..."

As tends to happen when one's hair is on fire, which is the usual case with soi disant "thought leaders."

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

"If you're taking flak, it just means you're over the target."

Agree: 4
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

The connection you point out with SIA is interesting. I'm sure this writer doesn't speak for SIA however I believe that industry thought leaders run in small circles and if the head of SIA is endorsing this person they might want to re-evaluate their endorsement based on his over the top inflammatory public statements.

I generally trust an IPVM product review over an SIA approval. I feel the IPVM tests are thorough and good detailed analysis is provided. SIA is needed by our industry so I don't discount their importance but it doesn't always translate to reliable endorsements.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

I learned a new word today!

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 2

To John and everyone at IPVM.

Show me a man with no enemies and I’ll show you a man who never stood for anything.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

IPVM is very opinionated. For some it is unusual to read so much emotion in it (i.e. facts and emotions in one article) instead of distinguishing between commentary and news.

Apparently someone has stepped on someone's toes.

Nevertheless, those who get personal are usually wrong ;)So don't worry and just ignore it. Those who read IPVM do so for one simple reason: it is the best site for news from the world of video surveillance.

Agree: 3
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

A personal attack, and defamation, followed up by a "hire a professional like myself" statement.

I don't think I could have made a more unprofessional post even If I tried.

Agree: 4
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Wow. Butthurtitis in its most bloviated form. Haha- I used it in a sentence, I think.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

"little too close to their BS Bone and they're fearful you'll expose them one day. Better they should "kill" you off before you can do that"

That was why I once asked John if he might want to funnel some of our subscription funds to a personal security detail;)

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

"the lack of hyperlink should have clued me in... but I was probably too worried about being sued and missed it. ; )"

Yep, I missed it too. That's what lazy got me.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Congratulations John and the IPVM team!!!! When a person or group starts getting this kind of attack coverage it usually means you're hitting someone a little too close to their BS Bone and they're fearful you'll expose them one day. Better they should "kill" you off before you can do that. If I had the time and was an investigative journalist I'd make a project out of digging into these folks and try to uncover their dirty little secret that IPVM is threatening to expose them for. I'd take this as a win!!!!

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

YES, great points. It points out a real issue by the way:

Wireless, wireless, wireless. I get it, why run cables when wireless will work and is really good these days and battery life is 3 to 5 years or longer.

Wireless wireless wireless SUCKS.. as do motion alerts and all-in-one cameras with no resolution or lens selection options. "One size fits Few" option.

So why 2 standards for commercial vs high end residential? Why are shitty systems "good enough" for SmartHome surveillance? They're not. Why are they sold then?

Customer not willing to pay?- maybe.. but not my experience and if yes then that's not your customer.

Lazy installers?.. who don't know how to sell, or position value against Ring, Nest, or explain why alert-on-motion sucks? ~Yep. They install some shitty cloud junk and run before the customer realizes what's happened. It's the 2021 version of truck slammer.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny

I had to circle back and give 1 a funny... I stone cold missed the parody because I didn't look it up. well-played 1!

the lack of hyperlink should have clued me in... but I was probably too worried about being sued and missed it. ; )

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

I've never seen John Honovich and Waluigi in the same room together at the same time and now I'm suspicious.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 12

Your troll powers are impressive. Did no one else look up 26 U.S. Code § 102? Or actually read the "quote"?

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative: 1
Unhelpful
Funny: 1

"As to your point about reading articles and then decided you don't like it, these are about a 2-5 minute read, and you can usually tell the content by the title/headline what the gist of the message is. "

I still like to give the blog a chance. But the many 2-5 minute reads do tend to add up and at my rate, it can get costly. I suppose in the end it was my choice to make the read....

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

no, actually.

6's comment referred to IPVM's culpability for simply being the platform that is 'allowing it to exist'

Yeah, but it’s funnier my way.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 2

"sue me."

Disclose yourself and maybe, just for fun someone may.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 1

you are an idiot.

sue me.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 2

"can Twitter be charged with libel for hosting 'derogatory words' that individuals post? no. can Facebook? same answer."

Doesn't matter, they are entities, like ipvm, and can be "sued", maybe not "charged", simply to waste as much of their financial resources defending the entity as possible. This might be the fun part for some. Even if nothing else comes of it; a little financial pain is "my guess"

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

no, actually.

6's comment referred to IPVM's culpability for simply being the platform that is 'allowing it to exist' - with 'it' being my joke. which is a ridiculous premise.

can Twitter be charged with libel for hosting 'derogatory words' that individuals post? no. can Facebook? same answer.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Thanks UD#1, I was too lazy to look up the code...yes I'm that lazy. Wondering if my attorneys would still laugh at me for asking the question UD#4....maybe after Martini#3. Funny thing is lawyers usually don't laugh at the questions (no matter how seemingly absurd); they like the challenge (because in their minds "we can win this"), and the currency that accompanies the challenge.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

I wonder if publicly naming these people in association with said topic and no proof on a public site like ipvm could be grounds for litigation against ipvm for allowing it to exist.

Yes, actually.

26 U.S. Code § 102 - Libel, Slander and Defamation

a) Any person who shall falsely utter and speak, or falsely write and publish, of and concerning any person of chaste character, any words derogatory of such person's character regarding virtue and chastity, or

b) Any person who shall make an unproven and unseemly association, especially in an iterative format, between such person and another unrelated such a person, in, around or through a public or paywalled site, shall not be allowed to exist.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 7

= 8.5/10

Agree: 2
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

"I didn't realise that attorneys had friends"

Of course they do; you pay them, they're your friend ;)

Unlike here, we pay them; they're not our friends.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful: 1
Funny: 2

"you have zero understanding of what libel is - and your attorney friends will laugh in your face if you are dumb enough to actually ask them."

Maybe they will; I'm stupid like that. I question everything. And actually I understand libel...oh I understand it...

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful: 1
Funny

Lee, don't be ridic.

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 2

attorney friends

I didn't realise that attorneys had friends

Agree: 2
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 7

I wonder if publicly naming these people in association with said topic and no proof on a public site like ipvm could be grounds for litigation against ipvm for allowing it to exist.

please spare me.

all of these people have been talked about in other strings here on IPVM... and the fact that all 3 have negative opinions of IPVM and John specifically is no secret - which is what makes it an obvious joke.

I also note that you left out that "my guess" prefaced the list of 3 I mentioned in the joke...

you have zero understanding of what libel is - and your attorney friends will laugh in your face if you are dumb enough to actually ask them.

.

Agree: 2
Disagree: 1
Informative
Unhelpful: 1
Funny: 1

"1. Lee Odess

2. Janet Fenner-Dabice

3. Jeffrey Zwirn, CPP, CFPS, CFE, SET, FASI-T, CHPA-IV, MBAT"

I wonder if publicly naming these people in association with said topic and no proof on a public site like ipvm could be grounds for litigation against ipvm for allowing it to exist. Yes, maybe it could be construed as libel. I'll have to see what a few attorney friends have to say....

Maybe ipvm has a case against LinkedIn too... Wow this could be fun.

Agree
Disagree: 7
Informative
Unhelpful: 2
Funny

IPVM is run by a bloviating industry drop-out who couldn't make it in the main stream

I see this group is really gaining traction on linkedin. They can honestly say they have had a 50% increase in membership in just 24 hours, very impressive. Personally I suspect that this is because of all the publicity they have received on IPVM.

The group now has 3 members.

Agree: 1
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 5

The upside down IPVM logo is especially LOL.

WAdl

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 2

Odds that all 3 members are Verkada bros?

my guess:

1. Lee Odess

2. Janet Fenner-Dabice

3. Jeffrey Zwirn, CPP, CFPS, CFE, SET, FASI-T, CHPA-IV, MBAT

Agree: 1
Disagree: 1
Informative: 1
Unhelpful: 1
Funny: 10

The upside down IPVM logo is especially LOL. Odds that all 3 members are Verkada bros?

IPVM Image

Agree: 2
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 6

Most good leaders will refrain from pointing out problems in plenum…

Btw, in the states, “pointing out problems in plenum” legally falls to the AHJ :)

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny: 4

Chit!

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

The video is even better ;)

Agree
Disagree
Informative
Unhelpful
Funny

Social media and non-verbal communication often leads to static and friction.

Also: water is wet.

A tactic I see used quite a bit on Twitter is that when a moron (me) posts something that rattles someone on a piedestal (lots of followers, can't help retweeting anyone praising them etc.), they will often screencap your tweet, and make a condescening comment about how ignorant I am (which is undoutably true). It's the same strategy the teacher would use to try to embarras kids in school - "come to the board Morten, so we can show the WHOLE class how stupid you are" (my tactic was to then soil myself right then and there).

On Twitter, what follows then, is a whole bunch of comments pointing out that, yes indeed, Morten is a fool, just look at his stupid comment.

Not pleasant at all.

Now I'm too old, tired, and I've learned that I can't convince the congregation to change their minds by pointing out how illogical and borderline insane their views are. They've heard pleads like mine a million times, and they've been conditioned to be wary and suspicious of people outside the tribe.

I've been blocked by a few people too. When they block me, I do what every other small minded and petty asshole does. I post a screenshot or comment, boasting that I, Morten, had to power to make an assistant push two buttons to shut me up. It fills me with a kind of hollow pride.

If I was a larger person; a better mensch, more decent, and more reflective, I probably wouldn't be trolling random people on twitter, and thus I wouldn't even be in a situation where I have long winded arguments with strangers about things I have no influence over, and that won't influence me one bit. Perhaps I wouldn't post passive-agressive, and veiled snarks that I know (secretly hope) will rile people up.

I've worked remote for many years, and will often prefer writing an email to calling people on the phone. The one thing I learned is that pointing out mistakes or errors, in writing, can upset people much more than intended. And that was all I learned btw.

There's just something unsettling about seeing an error or a mistake pointed out in writing, and especially on the Internet where we expect that nothing ever gets deleted (it does - just not the juicy stuff).

It's a hell of a lot worse if the disagreement is between two people who have vastly different clout. Most good leaders will refrain from pointing out problems in plenum (that's a cool academic word in Danish, but in English the word might be "public"), and instead have a quiet 1-on-1. And with good reason - it's the opposite approach of the sadistic teacher.

It's damn near impossible to resolve a spat over email, and on social media its probably harder.

There are people I think are idiots, and people that are dangerous idiots. But you're not going to convince an idiot of anything. Hell, you don't even know if YOU are the idiot.

So I guess that if you run an honest media company, then you have to point out flaws and issues IN PUBLIC, which then makes people angry. We don't need another outlet sponsored by the industry, with the sole purpose of regurtitating press releases full of self-praise and self-admiration.

Not sure if there's a point in there somewhere.

Have a nice day.

Agree: 8
Disagree
Informative: 5
Unhelpful
Funny: 8

He used to work for the same company I did - I italicized work cuz I really couldn't tell you what he did. I believe he was fired.

Agree
Disagree
Informative: 3
Unhelpful
Funny: 3