How Did Samsung Beat ObjectVideo Only To Settle With John B. Adrain?!

ObjectVideo's patent litigation record is impressive and almost unblemished. Prevailing against all those who would not voluntarily submit, Sony, Bosch, Panasonic, et al.

All except for Techwin, who turned back OV with this Samsmug comment

"We are very happy that the staff attorney and now ObjectVideo has apparently...

** **** ** **** **** ****** *** *****, **** *** products ** *** ******** ***********’* *******," **** * ********* ** Samsung *******’* ************ ******** ********** ** *** *********. "** ******* the ************ ******** ** ******, *** ** ** *** *** unnecessary ******* **** ****** ** ***** **********. **** ** *** we ******* ** ******** **** **** *** **** ******* ********** our ******* **********,"

John *. ******, celebrated "******** ******* *******", ** *** ***** **** *** **** ********, *** ******, AFAIK, ******* ** * ********.

*** *** **** ******** **** ** ****************** ** ****** ******* ****** *** ******* *** ** *********** figure. ***** ** *** **** *** * ***** ******, *** was ** **** *********** **** ****** ****** ******* *** ****** ************** **** ****** *** ******* *********** *** **** ***** (***, Dahua *** ********)?

*** ***** **** *** *** **** ******#, *********, ******** ‘******** monitoring ****** **** ***** ****** *** ***********,’ ********** ****** ** Nov **, ****. ** *******'* **** *** ***** ******** ****** the ****** *********** *****-** ** ***** ***** **'*. ******** ** security ********, * ******* ***** ******* * ******* ******** *********** product ***** **** **** * ******* **********.

*********, *** ******** **** *** **** ******** **** *******. ** how **** ***** **** *. * ***** ** *** ******** industry, ***? ;)

Login to read this IPVM discussion.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

****,

******* ******* *** ***** ******** ******** ** ******** **** ******** Electronics, *** ***** ***, **** ******, *******, ******* *******, ***.

******* *********** ******* **** ****** *** * ****** ** ***** Consumer *** *** ****** ***********.

********** **** *** ********, *** ** *** **** **** **** controlled ** *** **** **** ******* *****, ***** ****** ********* would **** **** ********* ** **** *********** ********* *******.

****, *** ***** ****** **** ** ****** ** ****** ******* a **** ******** *********** ******** **** **** ************, ** *** fact **** **** ****'* ** **** **** ** **********, ** me ** *****.

*********** ** *** **** **** ****** ** ***** *** **** patent# ************ ******* ******** **. **, ********** *** *** **'*, indicating * ****** ***** *********** ** **** **...

******* ******* ** *** ****** *** **** * ******** ******* from ******* ***********. ****** *********** **** ** **** * ******** stock ********* ** ******* ******* ***** **** ******** **** ***. However, **** *** ******** *********. ******* ******* ** ********** ******** from ***********. ***** **** *********** *** * ******** ***** *****, they ***** ********** *******.

***** *** ***** ****, ******* ** ***** **** ** *** Samsung *****. *** *&*, ***. ** *** ****, *** ** still **** **** *******. ******** ******** & ***** ******** *** still *******, *** **** ***** **** **********'* ********.

**** *******Techwin's *******:

***-**-**** ** ********* *** **** ****** ***** **** *** ***controlling ************** ******* *******, *********Samsung ***********, Samsung C&T and other Samsung ***** affiliates, sell their holding stakes in Samsung Techwin to Hanwha *****.

*** ******************* **** ** **, ***previous *********** ************ of Samsung Techwin were the Samsung ***** (including SG affiliate Samsung ***********). Even leaving names out, the same entity was in control of both affiliates at the time of both lawsuits.

** *** ******* **** ****** **** *** ******* ******* ******* after *** **** *********? ******* ****** **** *** ******* **********...