Actually, I DID acknowledge... that you nit-picked that it was the decoder - not the encoder. I even explained where the name CODEC came from (in the hopes of mitigating your committed belief that I'm an unintelligible ignoramus for copying the wrong part number from a page that discussed BOTH). I didn't known the naming convention from which to defend against so pivotal an error. I'm SURE you didn't have to look up what that part number corresponded to, you just knew it - right?
Would you do me the honor of providing a succinct, clear explanation of the naming convention HiSilicon uses? I can't BELIEVE how stupid I am. I mean - the fact that I didn't memorize their naming convention, by which, I could defend against such pedestrian mistakes as copying and pasting the wrong term. And I completely see how you'd be disabled from discussing the point, which I think someone with an IQ of 108 could infer:
And then!? Then?? I REALLY did it. Shhhh. My... opinion....!?? evolved? over time!
I get your point; no one should ever evaluate or articulate their thoughts more clearly. First draft. Always. It's what all authors and software companies do. Right? All those stupid revisions! Just ruins the product.
Where is my DOGMATISM!? Huh?? Howma gonna git ta heaven without more dogmatism!??
Are you, one of my fellow Americans who thinks "flip flopping" is a bad sign in a candidate when it's not for political gain, but as a byproduct of accruing information and modifying their beliefs to be in better harmony with the stupid data? Evolution's just a damned theory!
Just respond relentlessly to the title or a mistaken part number. DON'T update your responses based on new info, and for Christ's sake! The earth is 6,000 years old! How many times have I got to say it?? It'd be "specious" to say otherwise - and that's a damned commandment. GET WITH IT Chris.
My Guess: Hard Drives cause consumers more dissatisfaction than CPUs.
For the last decade - and potentially since the advent of the PC, hard drives were/are, the primary source of perceived 'slowness', frustration, and allowed manufactures to mislead you to believe it was every part but the one it was -- because no affordable technology existed to solve that pain.
This could be analogous to the race between MP and compression/hard drive space... or the ability to review it smoothly. Consumers will respond to 'consumerisms' like 4k - and manufactures will entice them with it. But, from the continuity of compatibility for their devices to the amount of heat generated by compressing data to a size that's practical to store and decode is still more challenging than consumers are warned about.
If we can exclude the servers people's phones/computers use, an '06 PC or Mac with a fast SSD will be more pleasurable throughout most uses, even in a Core Duo, than a much newer computer with an i7-7700 but a crappy hard drive that's in pre-failure. And, if you look at the ratio of HDD performance vs. CPU performance over time; that is, the number of GB/s a CPU can process, vs. the number Mb/s the cable supported, let alone, the health of the miniaturized record player - I'd say it's been this way for decades, I just don't have the data before the last decade to personally assert. Worse, consumers, thinking their WHOLE computer had "gotten old and slow" -- bought new computers, when only a hard drive was needed.
Take the 1.1GHz MacBook Retina, from 2015. FINE. Why? The SSD went around 800MB/s, and had a very high IOPS.
It's possible similarities exist in other domains.
Since you want youtube style comments, this is what you get:
Were you asserting that DSPs don't exist in cameras? That all cameras and all manufacturers impeccably offer the newest one? If your goal is to discuss ideas... rather than try to belittle other members, then why not skip the condescension and move straight to your beliefs on the topic?
Please, DO tell me... WHAT were you genuinely confused by? WHAT did you think my point actually was? I... often understand people when they speak a language I don't... by picking out just a few words that are cognates. Assuming you don't have Asperger's, were you REALLY disabled from plausible understandings? Or were you humping my leg because I used a decoder instead of an encoding part number...?
Augmenting your beliefs is a tenuous interpretation of what specious means. Again, you think I was arguing for a modified belief of my original statement, as though that's a duty to uphold. You have a very bizarre set of ideological beliefs to insist on MY meaning, rather than allowing it to mean what I'm RIGHT HERE to explain should you feel it's ambiguous.
If I pulled a bunch of ICs off a motherboard we fix (we do SMT repair after liquid or drop damage) - and you didn't know what all of the part numbers meant, would that suffice as your IQ? Aren't principles more interesting to discuss than spelling errors. The one, non-linguistic reference caused the entirety of your beliefs about me to be prejudiced?
I elaborate and tell you more about my thoughts - and you think I'm trying to imbue the "tagline" of the discussion with meaning that I'd concede if you'd merely ask, wasn't even on my mind when I wrote it. DID IT HAVE TO BE? I thought the "reply" button was for that purpose. Why isn't the "Post" button renamed "Concrete" ... ?
Did you know you were going to say specious when you originally charged me with the a misnomer infraction? HA! SEE!? You're lying! You DIDN'T know you'd say specious later, ergo, your earlier statement is (who knows what the hell to fill in here because I have NO idea what principle that illustrates!).
Does Axis, Pelco and other similarly positioned and prominent companies currently utilize in any of their product - DSPs that are released within the last 18 months - as well as listing said DSP publicly in their specifications?
My point was and is -- that the major manufactures that people here would regard as top dogs...
1. aren't focused on getting the newest DSPs
2. if they do, don't acknowledge it in their specifications
3. Maybe they do what apple does and make their own?
Either way, they play by different rules.
Chris, aka, Anonymous:
Please, tell me IF the lack of a part number ruined the above's capacity to be clear.
Did what I say within the italics relate sufficiently to the title?