6TB Hard Drive Powered By Helium?

Avatar
Brian Rhodes
Nov 04, 2013
IPVMU Certified

This seems like a gimmick: Western Digital enlists helium for 6TB energy-efficient drives

From the link: "Because helium has just one-seventh the density of air, using it reduces the turbulence caused by spinning disks and the heads that constantly move above them to read and write data."

This reminds me of the fad to fill automobile tires with Nitrogen. I also wonder if using Hydrogen would be an even greater advantage.

I am curious to get your thoughts?

Avatar
Carl Lindgren
Nov 04, 2013

Won't they float away if not anchored down?

TM
Timothy Mc Pheron
Nov 05, 2013

Helium is a noble idea. Hydrogen is flamable. Exploding hard drive capacity should not reduce bytes to bits.

Avatar
Brian Rhodes
Nov 05, 2013
IPVMU Certified
CD
Chris Dearing
Nov 06, 2013

No oxygen no flame... Noble is a nice touch...

MI
Matt Ion
Nov 05, 2013

If turbulence is such an issue, why not just suck the air out altogether and let the disks spin in a vacuum?

U
Undisclosed
Nov 05, 2013

The read/write head actually floats on a very thin gas layer, so vacuum would make it difficult to keep it at the correct distance. Hydrogen is a bad idea, since it diffuses through everything, including thick metal housings. That's also the main challenge for hydrogen powered cars, storing it requires the hydrogen to be either contained in bulky and heavy pressure tanks, kept at cryogenically cold temperatures or expensive metal hydride/chemical adsorbers. There is also the issue with hydrogens generous explosive limits, but in such small amounts, every cell phone battery is more dangerous.

Avatar
Jon Dillabaugh
Nov 06, 2013
Pro Focus LLC

Matt,

i would think think that a vacuum would eventually suck contaminants inside the drive.

MI
Matt Ion
Nov 06, 2013

There is that... I was really being tongue-in-cheek though, in the spirit of the other comments to that point :)

MI
Matt Ion
Nov 06, 2013

In all seriousness, though... I get the concept (as with the nitrogen-filled tires), I'm sure the benefits are legit, but wonder if it's really worth the hoopla, OR the additional cost. Granted, I don't know what kind of premium one pays on these drives over a similar non-He 6TB model (if they exist)...

I know with the tire/nitrogen thing, it's a good IDEA, I understand all the ideas behind it (less prone to expansion when heated, larger molecules won't leech through the tire as readily), but the fact is, the regular air being compressed and pumped into the tires is already 79% nitrogen.

I dunno, it reminds me a bit of a couple of ads I saw once in Car Audio Magazine many many years ago... one was an amplifier touting the benefits of their "SCAT" design - SCAT standing for Solid Core Acoustic Technology, essentially meaning they used solid rather than stranded wire for the internal wiring (with the requisite in-depth explanations of how this made things better); the other was for a CD head unit that made a big deal of the fact they used an optocoupler connection between the CD pickup and the rest of the deck's electronics... besides the noise isolation, they claimed better sound because the optocouplers moved signal "at the speed of light - that's fast!" (yes, I remember it used that exact wording) - uhh, last I checked, electricity moved pretty near the speed of light as well, close enough that any differences would be irrelevant over the few millimeters involved.

*sigh* Yay for marketing...

CD
Chris Dearing
Nov 06, 2013

I think the main benefit is that it exists. 4tb was the limit previously.

C

New discussion

Ask questions and get answers to your physical security questions from IPVM team members and fellow subscribers.

Newest discussions