Support Services Group | 08/12/18 07:33pm
For your reference…. See link to a false alarm study that is floating …. https://thecrimereport.org/2018/08/08/339214/
We believe most of the document is well researched and presented. However, be aware that page #5 of the study document is so seriously flawed that it could discredit the theme of the entire document. And it could produce justifiable defensive backfire from each of the 10 or more cities.
Hopefully, their editing was flawed, not the content, because as written, it also discredits current generation verification technologies that provide remote witness to 911 type events. We understand that even the most strict VR-Verified Response, or B&F- Broadcast& File will provide high priority police response to remote witnessed threats to people and property, even when called by private monitoring firms, like those represented by PPVAR and TMA.
That page #5 is also an insult to law enforcement all across the country, and could discredit the theme of the entire report.
What do you think ?