Enterprise Vs Surveillance Drives In Sizable Installation

I have a project with 300+ cameras running on 8 qty of 16 bay NVR configured with RAID 5 and all of these NVRS mounted on single rack.

cameras are recoding at 4MP 15fps around 2.5-3Mbps.

Considering the density per NVR and total vibration of the rack with these devices I am bit confused Becasue this is a critical site and failure cannot be tolerated .

considering this scenario,is it recommend to use purple/sky hawk or gold/exos?

We contacted supprt of manufacturers and getting mixed reviews.

Can someone advise?

i would appreciate if someone can seagate or we can also comment here.

Login to read this IPVM discussion.
Why do I need to log in?
IPVM conducts unique testing and research funded by member's payments enabling us to offer the most independent, accurate and in-depth information.

***** **** *******, ** average ** ** ****/*** is *** **** *****, but *** **** **** you **** ********** ** one **** *** ** one ****, **** (*'* guessing) ******** **** ** the **** ***** *******, and ***** **** *** PoE ******** ** ***** are **** ** ***** to ** **** ******* risk ******. ** *** fortunate **** ** ************ perspective **** *** **** able ****** *** **** gear ****** **** ** the ********* ** *** same ******, **** *** have **** **** ******* costs *** *** (*** I **** *******), *** have *** **** **** in *** ******. ** it's *** ******** ** feasible ** ********** **** of *** **** ** other ******* (** ***** buildings?), **** *'* *******: (a) **** ****** ** UPSs ** **** ** the **** ** *** power ** *** **** and *** ******** ***'* already ****** **; (*) RAID ** ***** '**********' but ** ***** *** of *** **** ****** be * ******** ****; (c) *** **** ***** circuits ** **** ********* goes ******* ** *****'* a *******; (*) *** didn't ******* ***** *** but ** ** ** database-driven, *** *** ****** to ************* ****** ******* and **** ** ***** 5 ****' ***** ** backups *** ****; (*) if ***'** ******* ***** vibrations, ******** *** **** with * ** ***** so **** ****'* ********, don't ****** ** *** a ** ***** ***** to ******** ****** *******; and (*) ** *** NVR *** **** ********** hardware ******** **, ****** any ********** ******* ************* so **** ****** *** be ******** ****** **** fail. *'* ********* ***** are **** ***** ****** options *** **** ** not ** **** ** expertise. **** ****!

**** ** ******* ****** be ********* **** * wouldn't ** ***** ***** I ***** ** ***** RAID6 ** ******

**** * ***** *****,*****,*** ** ****** ***** drives *** ********* **** your *******. **** *** great *** *** **** and **** ***** **. now **** * ***** about ** ** ***** and ****** ****** *** nothing **** **** ******* drives ** ** *******..

* ***** *** *** WD **** ****** ** cost **** ***** **, WD *** *** ** you *** ** * budget. ***** **** **** I ***'* *** ******** else ** *** ** line * ***** *** at **** ***** ***** than *** ********* **** which ** **** ****.

*** **** **** *** Seagate ********** **.

* ***'* ******** ***** drive ******* ***** **** day *********** *** *** could ****** ******* ***** that ** ****.

* ***** **** *****, don't *** *****... ****** you **** ** ***** rehearsing ** **** ****** how *** ***** ****** to ******* *** *** the **** ** **** unit ** ****.
************ ***** ****** *** not ***** ** ****** the ********** ** ***** packed ** ******** **** that **** ****** ** one ******* **** *** enterprise ****** ***. *** you *** *** ****, but **** **** * have ****** *****.

**** * ****** ** comments ** ***** *** surveillance, ** ** ** so ***** ********* *** used :-

************ ** **** ***** of ****** *** ****, a ***** ****** **** the ****** ***** ******* stress **/*, ***** ** actually *********** *** * sequentially-generated ******* **** ** surveillance *********.

*******, ** **** ***** about ***** ** **** you **** ** ** careful **** ********** *** throughput ** * ****** design. **** ***** ******* will **** * ****** high ********** (*** ** the ***** *******, ** estimated ******* *** *** is ***** ******), *** as ****** ******** ***** - ***** ****** **** end ** ******* ** in *******, ****** ** later. ** *** **** to ** **** **** your ******* ***** ********* throughput *** ** ******* when *** ***** ****** is ** "******** ****", i.e. **** ** ** also ********** * *****. That **** ***** * strain ** *** ****** and **** ***** *******' throughput ***** ************ ** degraded ****. ***** *** actually ** *****.

**** **********: ** ******* manufactures ***-**** ********** ******* systems ************ ******** *** surveillance. **** ***** *** the ********* ****** ********* above. ** ***** ********* above, *********, *** ********** biased, *** * **** informative, ** **** *** based ** **** ********** and ****** ********* *******. But ***** *** ********.

* ******* **** ******* recommends ** **** **** 16 ** ** ****** to * ****** *** Skyhawk *** *********** *********** . * ***** ***** to *** **** **** if ******** *******. * also **** **** ***** with *** ****** *************** relevant ** **** *** failover.

* **********,*** ***** ** still * **** ** clarification **** **** ************* about ******* *** ********** drives,if **** *** ***** to ****** **% ***** and *% **** ******** in **** */*.

***** ** ***** * good ********** ** ******** using **** *** **** countries *** ****** ********** to ***** **-*** **** of ******* ***** ** a **** ******* ** storage ***** *** **** well ****** ** ******** after *-* ***** ** FIFO ** *********** *** slowness ***** **** *** worse **** ** ***** is ********** ** ***** of ***** ******** *** for ****** ****** ****** rebuild ******* ********* ** array *******.

** ***** ** * great **** ** **** a ******* ***** ** standardization ** ***** ****** on **** ********* ******** with ****** ***** ** hard ****** **** ***** manufacturers.

****** **** **** ******* is ******* ** "******** rates" . ** *** case ** ***** ******** workloads **** ************ ***** there ***** ** ** an ******* ** ********** discussing **** ******* ** surveillance ******** ******* *******.

******* **** ***** *** long **** **** ****** does *** ****** ********* some ********** ****** ******* the ************* ********* ********** workload ****.

****** **** *******:

********** ******** **** =
(******** ****** + ******** Reads) * (**** / Lifetime ***** ** *****)

**** *** *** ****** of ***** ** * year. *** ******** **** becomes ** ********** ******* expressed ** **/****.

********** ****** *** ******* endowed **** ******* / longer **** ******** *******.

**** ***** *** **** for ********** *** ***** per **** *** ***-********** products.

*********** ******* ** ******** rates ****.

********* ***** *** ***** variables ** ******** ******* the *** ***** *** RAID *********.

*** **** ** **********, monitoring ** ***** ****, NAS ** *** ** DAS ********** *** ***** considerations *** ****** *** numerous *** ****** *** a **** ********* ************.

************, ************ **** ** giving *** ** ***/***** and *********** **** ******* like **** *** ******* for ***** ******* ** highly ********* **** ** high ******** *****.

******* *********** ******** ***** be ************ ************** *** **** **** their ********* ****** **** video ************.

***** *****,

** *** **** * can **** *** *********** team ** **** ****** with *** ** **** we ***** ********* *** why. ** *** **** you ******* * **** dive ** ** ** have **** ********** ** this. ** ** ** you ****.