Defunding police = need for Private Security: Is it possible that a major alarm association could be knowingly supporting the advocates for “defunding the police”? With fewer and weaker local police, the need for private security increases. If true, who is funding that agenda? If true, how many regular members are unaware of that agenda. Regular members who expect alarm site-response by local police, should ask their Association leadership if they support the controversial “Model Ordinance”.
Subscriber Discussion
Defunding Police = Need For Private Security:
JH
John Honovich
Oct 10, 2022LJ
Lee Jones
Oct 10, 2022****…. ********* **** ********… **. **** dive ********… ***, **** ***** ** reasons **** ******* *** “******” *********, several ******** ****. ********, **** ******* of ***/*********** ****** ********, *** ***** alarms, *** **** *** ***** ****** value. ********* ** **** ** **% UPR/ ***** ******, *** **% ** police *******, ***** ***** **** ** Public **** **** *** ******* ****. It **** *** **** **** ** public ********. ***** ****** ******* **** deterrent **** $***** *** ***** ***** signal ********* **** ****** ****** ****-********. And **** ** ******** ***** ***** fees **** ***** ** ******* ** the ****. *** ***** ** “********” alarms, **** ******** ** **** ** no ****-******** = ***** ********* *** specter ** ********* ******** *********. **** of ****** *** *** “******” ******.
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #1
Oct 10, 2022** "****** *** ******" ***** * thing? * *****'* ******* ****** ******* about ** ********.
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #2
Oct 10, 2022**** ** ********** *** ******* ***** the “****** *** ******” ********. ****** Republicans.
***. ***. *** ****: '****** *** police ***** **** * *** ** our **********' | *** ****
UE
Undisclosed End User #3
Oct 10, 2022* ***** **** **#* ***** ** no *** ** ******* ***** ***** in ***** ** **. ****, ***** in ******* ********* ** ********** ** New **** ***** *** ********* *********** being ** ***** ** **, *** not ** *** **** *****.
** ***** **** ****** *** **** (even *** *** *** ****) ********** and ********** "* ***** ***** ***********" per *** ***** ** ******* ******** Group ** *** ** ******* ** favor ** **.
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #5
Jan 01, 2023** *** ***** *** "*********" **** called *** ********* ** ***** ****. It *** *** ***** ***** ** "Progressives" *** ********* *** *** ********** Democrat ****** ********* ** ******** ***** voices **. *******, *** *********** *** this ** * ***** **** ***** to **** ****** *** ******** ****** so **** **** ******* **** **** by ******** ** **** "** ******** is * ******** *** ********* **** to ****** *** ******" ********. *****, that ****** ****** ******* *** ******** of ****** ***'* **** *** **** to ******* ********** *** **** ******* whatever ****'** ***** **** ** *** person ** ***** *****. **** ******* do *** **** *****. *** *********** have *** "*** ***** ****" **** that **** ********** *********** * *** name **** ***** *** ******. *'* like ** *** **** ******* ********** and **** **** ********* ****** *** other ********* ** *****. ******** ****** "Independent" *** *** **** ** **** between *** ******* **** ****!
UI
Undisclosed Integrator #4
Dec 31, 2022****** **** ** ****** *** ****** all **** ****. ** *** **** a **** ** *** ****** **** pushed *** ** *** **** ** crime. **** **** ** ******* **** and *** *********** ********** **** *** for ****** **********.
**** ** * ******** ******, ** you ***** **** ********* ***** ** had ** *** ****** ***** ******* justified ** ***, ** **** ****** will ** *** ** ****** *** have ******** ** ******** ** ******* in ***** **** *** ********.
LJ
Lee Jones
Dec 31, 2022Some ** ** **** ***** *** **** **************!! I, Lee Jones, do not, DO NOT support or endorse any of the efforts to “defund the police”!! I am simply reporting the actions and interpretations of others!! Although, I do support the need to “repurpose” (without defunding) many outdated police practices.
Ryan King
Mar 24, 2023** *** ******* ** ******* *** of *** ******* ** “****** *** police”!! * ** ****** ********* *** actions *** *************** ** ******!!Although, * ** ******* *** **** ** “*********” (******* *********) **** ******** ****** *********.
**** ** **** ********* *** ****** was ******** ** **** *********. *** as **** **** ****** ** **** society ** ******* ********, **'* **** appropriated ** **** ********* ****** ** different ******. ********* **** ***** **** the **** *** ****** *** ****** back ** ***** **. *** *** genie ** *** ** *** ******.
*'* *** *** ****** **** *** the ****** *** ********* *** ****/***** around **** ************ ** ******* *******. Reducing ***** ****** ** *** *** we *** **** ****** **** *** party ********* ** ****** ****** *******.
LJ
Lee Jones
Mar 24, 2023**** *** ******* **** ********** */**/**…”Court ******* ******* ** ******** ***** ******** *****/****.. ****** ** *** ****** $*****”
New discussion
Ask questions and get answers to your physical security questions from IPVM team members and fellow subscribers.
Newest discussions
** ** ********? ****** **'* ********. Do *** ****** **** **** *** have ******** **** **** *** ***** so?