We have a client with a few hundred Cisco 6020/6030 cameras installed. The Client had a Cisco on premise VMS and storage solution that is now end of life. They are choosing not to migrate to Meraki, which I understand is Cisco's cloud storage solution.
The product literature for the Cisco 6120 states the camera is
"●**** ***.******* *** ***** *.* ****** *** standards ***** **************** *** ************** **** other ***** **********."
*'* *** **** **** ***** *.* is *** *** *** * ****** profile ** *****.***. * **** ***'* see *** ***** ******* ****** ** compliant ** *** ***** *******.
** ** ******** *** ******* **** were ************ ** ** *** *** rebranded ** ***** *** ***** *** OEM **** ** ****** ** *** ONVIF ********** ****? **** ****** **** who *** *** ***? ******* **** discussion ****** **** ******* *** ** the ***. *** ****** ******* ****?
***/***, ***** ***** *** ******* **** ONVIF ***** **** *** ** ** going ** ** * *** ** a **** *****. *******:
***** ********** **** * *.* ****** convention *** ***** ** ******** ** Profiles, ** ** ****** **** **** (though * ** ******* ** **** point ***** *.* *** * *****). I ******** *****'* ******* *** ***** the **** ** *** - ** Cisco ********.** **** *****, ***** *** ********** a ****** ** ******** ** ** *** ****** *** ****** **** *****.
* ** ******* ******* *** ***** ODM *** ** *** *****'* *** firmware (*** ****** ** ******** *****).
***, ***, ****** ** *** *****'* current ***** ************ ******** (******** ***** ************ ** ****, **** Live ***** ****** ***** ************). ****** *** ******* *******, ***** ******* *** *** ** broad * ********* *** *** ** aggressive.