Mr. Gligorich,
You are taking two separate references of mine - to two different things - and combining them into an equation that is not valid.
I made advice like this:
STATEMENT 1: "Note: I still would never recommend he installs anything he knows himself to be illegal"
He in my sentence above refers to the gentleman who originally posted this thread - Mr. Keith Fraley (HE is the 'integrator')
Based on your 'talking out of two sides of my face' comment, you appear to believe that this next comment contradicts the very sage advice from my first statement:
STATEMENT 2: "This is not legal in my state and I told him so."
Him is my old customer when I was the integrator trunkslammer. (Him is the end user).
--------------------------
You see? In both cases, my advice is for the integrator to not install illegal covert audio surveillance.
Because if they do, they could potentially be joined up in any lawsuit that arises from them installing it for their customer.
I was speaking to Mr. Bolduc in my first statement, and I was referring to the one point of his advice that I did not agree with - advising the integrator in this thread (Mr. Fraley) to install covert audio surveillance for his customer when he (Mr. Fraley) knows this to be illegal.
My 2nd statement above was referring to what I had done (as the integrator) when dealing with a customer who I felt would most likely do it himself anyway.
--------------------------
These two statements do not contradict each other. Only one side of my face was required.