Dennis, thanks for the follow up.
A WDR rating of 65.2dB is really not even WDR. Not that I trust those ratings, but if ACTi believed this camera was 'true' WDR, it would have been at least 100dB. Non WDR cameras are typically rated in the 60s.
An IK08 rating is believable though that's still 75% less than 'full' IK10 (i.e., only 5 joules of impact vs 20). Obviously, ACTi is not alone in this questionable 'vandal' specification but it needs to be recognized.
Finally, the low light performance specs are very interesting and a little weird.
The 10MP E97 has a 1/2.3" sensor and a f/1.8 lens. I am a little stunned that it's f/1.8 as most as 720p minidomes don't have f/1.8. Given that the resolution is so high, I would expect a much higher f stop or a much higher price.
By contrast, the 5MP E93 has a 1/3.2" sensor and a f/2.8 lens. The 1/3.2" sensor is quite small for its resolution (typically you see bigger 1/3" sensors for regular HD). The f/2.7 lens is quite poor but not shocking. That said, the combination of a relatively small sensor and a relatively high f stop indicates likely terrible low light performance.
Ultimately, one has to do a test but there's enough weird points in the specs to be extra cautious in evaluating performance here.