X
Get all access to the world's best video surveillance information.
Logo
680-70-2015-free-banner

FAILED: Facial Recognition & Boston Bombing

Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 20, 2013

Facial recognition vendors have been tripping over themselves to take credit, insert or claim the wonders of their offerings to identify the Boston bombers. However, an excellent Washington Post investigative report cites Boston's Police Commissioner, confirming that:

"Facial-recognition software did not identify the men in the ball caps. The technology came up empty even though both Tsarnaevs’ images exist in official databases."

So what solved the case? A lot of:

"Work [that] was painstaking and mind-numbing: One agent watched the same segment of video 400 times."

Plus, a critical tip from a victim who had seen the bomber face to face:

"FBI agents quickly came to Bauman’s bedside. A man in sunglasses and black baseball cap had walked right up to him, placed a black backpack on the ground and stepped away, Bauman remembered.

His tip became a critical lead, according to law enforcement officials."

A story that should be about the around the clock work of human investigators and the resolve of a man whose legs were torn off has been turned into a promotional campaign for technology vendors.

Technical Barriers to Facial Recognition

The images captured on the street, both from surveillance cameras and smartphones, were not good enough to deliver high accuracy matching. Recall the video from the Lord & Taylor's surveillance cameras, excerpt below:

There's too much downtilt plus the subjects are tending to look the other way, plus the pixel density is too low (standard definition camera with a ~15 foot wide FoV). And obviously the other suspect (#1) was wearing a forward facing cap and sunglasses, causing even more problems.

Note, this does not mean the cameras deployed were necessarily 'bad'. They are sufficient for general monitoring but not for the radically more demanding needs of facial recognition.

Only 'Hollywood' make believe facial recognition could use this.

Ironically, the images from smartphones were of better suitability for facial recognition than surveillance cameras. Here's an excerpt from one of the best ones:

This is obviously from a much wider FoV and the resulting pixel density is too low to deliver accurate facial matching. A fuzzy image of a face may be 'easy' for a human to verify against a specific person/photo but ask a computer to do this against millions of images and it becomes an exercise in futility.


Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 20, 2013
Comments (19): PRO Members only. Login. or Join.



Other Updates on Video Analytics

Mark Cuban Funded Video Analytics Company - Netra on Mar 06, 2015
Mark Cuban has funded a video analytics, the second Texas billionaire to take a stake in a survei...

iCetena - This Company Claims to Do What BRS Labs Claims to Do on Nov 10, 2014
In the US, BRS Labs has been the poster boy for outsized marketing. However, BRS Labs' core clai...

Gun Detection Analytics Are Here, Says Startup on Jul 03, 2014
A timely innovation, or cashing in on tragedies? A new video analytics company is touting its 'g...

ioimage / DVTel Analytic Updates on Feb 20, 2014
In the 4 years since DVTel Acquired ioimage, they have gone quiet but upcoming new products combi...

This Company is "Going To Change the Video Surveillance Market Forever" on Oct 17, 2013
Stop emailing me about this company. All of you. Seriously. In a brilliant marketing campaign, a...

Failed: Surveillance Tech Predictions on Jun 08, 2013
Days before 9/11, MIT's Technology Review released a tour de force review of surveillance technol...

Future of Facial Recognition on May 04, 2013
The Boston Bombings reaffirmed how far facial recognition needs to develop to be an effective sur...

Successful Facial Surveillance Case on Jan 07, 2013
Real time facial surveillance is hard to do - accuracy issues, false alerts, cost and deployment ...

HP Autonomy Fraud Claims on Nov 20, 2012
Massive fraud is revealed in a superstar analytics company -- a lesson that all of us in surveill...


Most Recent Industry Updates

Avigilon Weak Profits Continue - Q2 2015 on Aug 03, 2015
After spending $39 million buying back their own stock, one would think (or hope) Avigilon would ...

"Future-Proofing" Access Control Guide on Jul 30, 2015
Its one of the most misused phrases around: "Future-proof". However, even without the crystal bal...

Manufacturers: Get Paying or Get Sued - Avigilon Patent Licensing Program on Jul 29, 2015
The new Avigilon 'patent licensing program' is starting to roll out, confirmed Avigilon's CEO on ...

The Company Behind AHD on Jul 29, 2015
They are the star of nearly every Chinese spam email now. Plus, they just picked up Samsung. We...

Arecont Pulls End User Marketing Claims on Jul 28, 2015
Manufacturers, you have to get explicit permission from end users and only state factually true c...

RIP Frank De Fina on Jul 27, 2015
Frank De Fina has passed away. De Fina was a well known and respected industry executive, who mo...

Gun Detecting Smartcam Startup on Jul 27, 2015
Wild claims are nothing new for security products, but one startup is claiming its home camera ca...

Arecont Accurately Predicts Its Own Fall on Jul 24, 2015
You have to give credit where credit is due. Three years ago, Arecont introduced the idiotic Pix...

Surveillance Design Training Class on Jul 23, 2015
In this webinar, we demonstrated how to better design video surveillance systems using the IPVM c...

BICSI Dumps Security Certification on Jul 23, 2015
Security people may love IT, but the feeling evidently is not mutual. Standards/certification gr...