X
Get all access to the world's best video surveillance information.
Logo
Free-book-promo-680-70

FAILED: Facial Recognition & Boston Bombing

Facial recognition vendors have been tripping over themselves to take credit, insert or claim the wonders of their offerings to identify the Boston bombers. However, an excellent Washington Post investigative report cites Boston's Police Commissioner, confirming that:

"Facial-recognition software did not identify the men in the ball caps. The technology came up empty even though both Tsarnaevs’ images exist in official databases."

So what solved the case? A lot of:

"Work [that] was painstaking and mind-numbing: One agent watched the same segment of video 400 times."

Plus, a critical tip from a victim who had seen the bomber face to face:

"FBI agents quickly came to Bauman’s bedside. A man in sunglasses and black baseball cap had walked right up to him, placed a black backpack on the ground and stepped away, Bauman remembered.

His tip became a critical lead, according to law enforcement officials."

A story that should be about the around the clock work of human investigators and the resolve of a man whose legs were torn off has been turned into a promotional campaign for technology vendors.

Technical Barriers to Facial Recognition

The images captured on the street, both from surveillance cameras and smartphones, were not good enough to deliver high accuracy matching. Recall the video from the Lord & Taylor's surveillance cameras, excerpt below:

There's too much downtilt plus the subjects are tending to look the other way, plus the pixel density is too low (standard definition camera with a ~15 foot wide FoV). And obviously the other suspect (#1) was wearing a forward facing cap and sunglasses, causing even more problems.

Note, this does not mean the cameras deployed were necessarily 'bad'. They are sufficient for general monitoring but not for the radically more demanding needs of facial recognition.

Only 'Hollywood' make believe facial recognition could use this.

Ironically, the images from smartphones were of better suitability for facial recognition than surveillance cameras. Here's an excerpt from one of the best ones:

This is obviously from a much wider FoV and the resulting pixel density is too low to deliver accurate facial matching. A fuzzy image of a face may be 'easy' for a human to verify against a specific person/photo but ask a computer to do this against millions of images and it becomes an exercise in futility.


Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 20, 2013
Comments (19): PRO Members only. Login. or Join.



Other Updates on Video Analytics

Gun Detection Analytics Are Here, Says Startup on Jul 03, 2014
A timely innovation, or cashing in on tragedies? A new video analytics company is touting its 'g...

ioimage / DVTel Analytic Updates on Feb 20, 2014
In the 4 years since DVTel Acquired ioimage, they have gone quiet but upcoming new products combi...

This Company is "Going To Change the Video Surveillance Market Forever" on Oct 17, 2013
Stop emailing me about this company. All of you. Seriously. In a brilliant marketing campaign, a...

Failed: Surveillance Tech Predictions on Jun 08, 2013
Days before 9/11, MIT's Technology Review released a tour de force review of surveillance technol...

Future of Facial Recognition on May 04, 2013
The Boston Bombings reaffirmed how far facial recognition needs to develop to be an effective sur...

Successful Facial Surveillance Case on Jan 07, 2013
Real time facial surveillance is hard to do - accuracy issues, false alerts, cost and deployment ...

HP Autonomy Fraud Claims on Nov 20, 2012
Massive fraud is revealed in a superstar analytics company -- a lesson that all of us in surveill...

Bad News for Face Recognition (FTC) on Oct 22, 2012
Cold water is being thrown on renewed dreams of using facial recognition and demographic analysis...

License Plate Recognition (LPR) Providers Overview on Oct 09, 2012
License Plate Recognition is the most successful of all video analytic systems (sure, faint prais...


Most Recent Industry Updates

ADI's Price Match Guarantee Compared on Aug 01, 2014
Few policies are more powerful than "price matching." If a buyer sees a good deal elsewhere, the...

Michael Dell Invests in VSaaS Startup Eagle Eye on Aug 01, 2014
Only a month after Google bought Dropcam, Michael Dell is investing in VSaaS startup, Eagle Eye N...

'Sick', 'Greedy' Avigilon CFO Gets A New Job on Jul 31, 2014
Avigilon's explanations for their CFO crisis are falling apart but, in the meantime, it has worke...

Electric Strikes: Why They Are So Popular on Jul 31, 2014
Electric strikes are a mainstay part of access control, but how often do integrators use them? In...

Anixter Security Revenue Declines on Jul 30, 2014
Last quarter, we reviewed how Anixter's security business was struggling. Now, new financial resu...

VMS Webinar Series - Avigilon, NUUO, OnSSI, Network Optix on Jul 29, 2014
Over the next month, each Monday at 11am EDT / 15:00 GMT, IPVM will be hosting a webinar on a dif...

How Manufacturers Compete Against Low Cost on Jul 29, 2014
"I'll take whatever's cheapest" is perhaps the most hated phrase any salesman could hear. Yet hi...

Access Control: Here's Why Integrators Choose Multiple Lines on Jul 28, 2014
With so many access options in the market, how many platforms do integrators typically sell? More...

Testing Bioscrypt's V-Flex Fingerprint Reader on Jul 25, 2014
With fingerprint readers available for as little as $100, why would you pay more? Consider Morpho...

VSaaS Startup Pivots to Camera API Provider on Jul 24, 2014
This is a fascinating case study of how a VSaaS startup recognized the flaws in that market and a...