X
Get all access to the world's best video surveillance information.
Logo
680-70-2015-free-banner

FAILED: Facial Recognition & Boston Bombing

Facial recognition vendors have been tripping over themselves to take credit, insert or claim the wonders of their offerings to identify the Boston bombers. However, an excellent Washington Post investigative report cites Boston's Police Commissioner, confirming that:

"Facial-recognition software did not identify the men in the ball caps. The technology came up empty even though both Tsarnaevs’ images exist in official databases."

So what solved the case? A lot of:

"Work [that] was painstaking and mind-numbing: One agent watched the same segment of video 400 times."

Plus, a critical tip from a victim who had seen the bomber face to face:

"FBI agents quickly came to Bauman’s bedside. A man in sunglasses and black baseball cap had walked right up to him, placed a black backpack on the ground and stepped away, Bauman remembered.

His tip became a critical lead, according to law enforcement officials."

A story that should be about the around the clock work of human investigators and the resolve of a man whose legs were torn off has been turned into a promotional campaign for technology vendors.

Technical Barriers to Facial Recognition

The images captured on the street, both from surveillance cameras and smartphones, were not good enough to deliver high accuracy matching. Recall the video from the Lord & Taylor's surveillance cameras, excerpt below:

There's too much downtilt plus the subjects are tending to look the other way, plus the pixel density is too low (standard definition camera with a ~15 foot wide FoV). And obviously the other suspect (#1) was wearing a forward facing cap and sunglasses, causing even more problems.

Note, this does not mean the cameras deployed were necessarily 'bad'. They are sufficient for general monitoring but not for the radically more demanding needs of facial recognition.

Only 'Hollywood' make believe facial recognition could use this.

Ironically, the images from smartphones were of better suitability for facial recognition than surveillance cameras. Here's an excerpt from one of the best ones:

This is obviously from a much wider FoV and the resulting pixel density is too low to deliver accurate facial matching. A fuzzy image of a face may be 'easy' for a human to verify against a specific person/photo but ask a computer to do this against millions of images and it becomes an exercise in futility.


Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 20, 2013
Comments (19): PRO Members only. Login. or Join.



Other Updates on Video Analytics

iCetena - This Company Claims to Do What BRS Labs Claims to Do on Nov 10, 2014
In the US, BRS Labs has been the poster boy for outsized marketing. However, BRS Labs' core clai...

Gun Detection Analytics Are Here, Says Startup on Jul 03, 2014
A timely innovation, or cashing in on tragedies? A new video analytics company is touting its 'g...

ioimage / DVTel Analytic Updates on Feb 20, 2014
In the 4 years since DVTel Acquired ioimage, they have gone quiet but upcoming new products combi...

This Company is "Going To Change the Video Surveillance Market Forever" on Oct 17, 2013
Stop emailing me about this company. All of you. Seriously. In a brilliant marketing campaign, a...

Failed: Surveillance Tech Predictions on Jun 08, 2013
Days before 9/11, MIT's Technology Review released a tour de force review of surveillance technol...

Future of Facial Recognition on May 04, 2013
The Boston Bombings reaffirmed how far facial recognition needs to develop to be an effective sur...

Successful Facial Surveillance Case on Jan 07, 2013
Real time facial surveillance is hard to do - accuracy issues, false alerts, cost and deployment ...

HP Autonomy Fraud Claims on Nov 20, 2012
Massive fraud is revealed in a superstar analytics company -- a lesson that all of us in surveill...

Bad News for Face Recognition (FTC) on Oct 22, 2012
Cold water is being thrown on renewed dreams of using facial recognition and demographic analysis...


Most Recent Industry Updates

IP Camera Course Spring 2015 Opened on Feb 27, 2015
This is the only independent IP camera course, based on in-depth product and technology testing. ...

Extend and Save Up to 25% on Feb 25, 2015
IPVM has added a new feature that allows members to save up to 25% by extending their membership ...

Avigilon Real Time Exposure And Gain on Feb 24, 2015
Knowing how exposure and gain impact image quality, bandwidth, and camera performance can useful ...

Axis Fixes VBR / CBR Setting on Feb 23, 2015
Bit rate control is an important element in transmitting surveillance video. The three most commo...

Bandwidth Guide for Video Networks on Feb 23, 2015
Bandwidth is the most fundamental element of computer networking for video surveillance systems. ...

Vacation Rental Access Control: The 'ResortLock' on Feb 20, 2015
Controlling access to your vacation home or rental property is the vision of ResortLock. Through ...

Stand Out From Your Competition - Webinar on Feb 19, 2015
We presented 4 key ideas for integrators to stand out from their competition, digging into each o...

Worst Access Products - 100 Integrators Sound Off on Feb 18, 2015
100 integrators told us which access product lines gave them the biggest problems in the last yea...

Axis and Milestone To Remain Independent, Canon Declares on Feb 17, 2015
Hoping, fearing, anticipating a 'Super Avigilon'? Will Axis and Milestone merge to become an 'en...