X
Get all access to the world's best video surveillance information.
Logo
680-70-2015-free-banner

FAILED: Facial Recognition & Boston Bombing

Facial recognition vendors have been tripping over themselves to take credit, insert or claim the wonders of their offerings to identify the Boston bombers. However, an excellent Washington Post investigative report cites Boston's Police Commissioner, confirming that:

"Facial-recognition software did not identify the men in the ball caps. The technology came up empty even though both Tsarnaevs’ images exist in official databases."

So what solved the case? A lot of:

"Work [that] was painstaking and mind-numbing: One agent watched the same segment of video 400 times."

Plus, a critical tip from a victim who had seen the bomber face to face:

"FBI agents quickly came to Bauman’s bedside. A man in sunglasses and black baseball cap had walked right up to him, placed a black backpack on the ground and stepped away, Bauman remembered.

His tip became a critical lead, according to law enforcement officials."

A story that should be about the around the clock work of human investigators and the resolve of a man whose legs were torn off has been turned into a promotional campaign for technology vendors.

Technical Barriers to Facial Recognition

The images captured on the street, both from surveillance cameras and smartphones, were not good enough to deliver high accuracy matching. Recall the video from the Lord & Taylor's surveillance cameras, excerpt below:

There's too much downtilt plus the subjects are tending to look the other way, plus the pixel density is too low (standard definition camera with a ~15 foot wide FoV). And obviously the other suspect (#1) was wearing a forward facing cap and sunglasses, causing even more problems.

Note, this does not mean the cameras deployed were necessarily 'bad'. They are sufficient for general monitoring but not for the radically more demanding needs of facial recognition.

Only 'Hollywood' make believe facial recognition could use this.

Ironically, the images from smartphones were of better suitability for facial recognition than surveillance cameras. Here's an excerpt from one of the best ones:

This is obviously from a much wider FoV and the resulting pixel density is too low to deliver accurate facial matching. A fuzzy image of a face may be 'easy' for a human to verify against a specific person/photo but ask a computer to do this against millions of images and it becomes an exercise in futility.


Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 20, 2013
Comments (19): PRO Members only. Login. or Join.



Other Updates on Video Analytics

iCetena - This Company Claims to Do What BRS Labs Claims to Do on Nov 10, 2014
In the US, BRS Labs has been the poster boy for outsized marketing. However, BRS Labs' core clai...

Gun Detection Analytics Are Here, Says Startup on Jul 03, 2014
A timely innovation, or cashing in on tragedies? A new video analytics company is touting its 'g...

ioimage / DVTel Analytic Updates on Feb 20, 2014
In the 4 years since DVTel Acquired ioimage, they have gone quiet but upcoming new products combi...

This Company is "Going To Change the Video Surveillance Market Forever" on Oct 17, 2013
Stop emailing me about this company. All of you. Seriously. In a brilliant marketing campaign, a...

Failed: Surveillance Tech Predictions on Jun 08, 2013
Days before 9/11, MIT's Technology Review released a tour de force review of surveillance technol...

Future of Facial Recognition on May 04, 2013
The Boston Bombings reaffirmed how far facial recognition needs to develop to be an effective sur...

Successful Facial Surveillance Case on Jan 07, 2013
Real time facial surveillance is hard to do - accuracy issues, false alerts, cost and deployment ...

HP Autonomy Fraud Claims on Nov 20, 2012
Massive fraud is revealed in a superstar analytics company -- a lesson that all of us in surveill...

Bad News for Face Recognition (FTC) on Oct 22, 2012
Cold water is being thrown on renewed dreams of using facial recognition and demographic analysis...


Most Recent Industry Updates

Lockitron Admits Failure on Jan 29, 2015
They were Silicon Valley's chosen one. The company who was going to disrupt access control, back...

Exacq Fires Rep Firms on Jan 28, 2015
The Tyco-fication of Exacq is gaining stream. Exacq has fired multiple manufacturer representati...

NTP / Network Time Guide For Video Surveillance on Jan 27, 2015
Inaccurate time can lead to missing or inadmissible video, yet this topic is often overlooked, wi...

Vidsys CEO Out on Jan 27, 2015
Three years ago, Vidsys, one of the last independent PSIMs, named a prestigious CEO. Now he is o...

New Long Range Wireless Access Solution (Allegion) on Jan 26, 2015
Delivering access control to parking lot gates or elevators usually means spending tens of thousa...

3VR Stays Alive With $8 Million Financing on Jan 23, 2015
Now 13 years old, 3VR is the last of a generation of the hyped video analytic startups to find an...

Camera Size Search Engine on Jan 22, 2015
Small cameras are highly desirable. And manufacturers want to deliver them - minidomes, microdom...

Network Cable Testing Guide on Jan 22, 2015
Proper cable installation is key to trouble-free surveillance systems. However, testing is often...

Avigilon Acquires 96 MORE Patents on Jan 21, 2015
Spending $80 million on patents last month was evidently just the start. Now, Avigilon has acqui...