X
Get all access to the world's best video surveillance information.
Logo
680-70-2015-free-banner

FAILED: Facial Recognition & Boston Bombing

Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 20, 2013

Facial recognition vendors have been tripping over themselves to take credit, insert or claim the wonders of their offerings to identify the Boston bombers. However, an excellent Washington Post investigative report cites Boston's Police Commissioner, confirming that:

"Facial-recognition software did not identify the men in the ball caps. The technology came up empty even though both Tsarnaevs’ images exist in official databases."

So what solved the case? A lot of:

"Work [that] was painstaking and mind-numbing: One agent watched the same segment of video 400 times."

Plus, a critical tip from a victim who had seen the bomber face to face:

"FBI agents quickly came to Bauman’s bedside. A man in sunglasses and black baseball cap had walked right up to him, placed a black backpack on the ground and stepped away, Bauman remembered.

His tip became a critical lead, according to law enforcement officials."

A story that should be about the around the clock work of human investigators and the resolve of a man whose legs were torn off has been turned into a promotional campaign for technology vendors.

Technical Barriers to Facial Recognition

The images captured on the street, both from surveillance cameras and smartphones, were not good enough to deliver high accuracy matching. Recall the video from the Lord & Taylor's surveillance cameras, excerpt below:

There's too much downtilt plus the subjects are tending to look the other way, plus the pixel density is too low (standard definition camera with a ~15 foot wide FoV). And obviously the other suspect (#1) was wearing a forward facing cap and sunglasses, causing even more problems.

Note, this does not mean the cameras deployed were necessarily 'bad'. They are sufficient for general monitoring but not for the radically more demanding needs of facial recognition.

Only 'Hollywood' make believe facial recognition could use this.

Ironically, the images from smartphones were of better suitability for facial recognition than surveillance cameras. Here's an excerpt from one of the best ones:

This is obviously from a much wider FoV and the resulting pixel density is too low to deliver accurate facial matching. A fuzzy image of a face may be 'easy' for a human to verify against a specific person/photo but ask a computer to do this against millions of images and it becomes an exercise in futility.


Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 20, 2013
Comments (19): PRO Members only. Login. or Join.



Other Updates on Video Analytics

Mark Cuban Funded Video Analytics Company - Netra on Mar 06, 2015
Mark Cuban has funded a video analytics, the second Texas billionaire to take a stake in a survei...

iCetena - This Company Claims to Do What BRS Labs Claims to Do on Nov 10, 2014
In the US, BRS Labs has been the poster boy for outsized marketing. However, BRS Labs' core clai...

Gun Detection Analytics Are Here, Says Startup on Jul 03, 2014
A timely innovation, or cashing in on tragedies? A new video analytics company is touting its 'g...

ioimage / DVTel Analytic Updates on Feb 20, 2014
In the 4 years since DVTel Acquired ioimage, they have gone quiet but upcoming new products combi...

This Company is "Going To Change the Video Surveillance Market Forever" on Oct 17, 2013
Stop emailing me about this company. All of you. Seriously. In a brilliant marketing campaign, a...

Failed: Surveillance Tech Predictions on Jun 08, 2013
Days before 9/11, MIT's Technology Review released a tour de force review of surveillance technol...

Future of Facial Recognition on May 04, 2013
The Boston Bombings reaffirmed how far facial recognition needs to develop to be an effective sur...

Successful Facial Surveillance Case on Jan 07, 2013
Real time facial surveillance is hard to do - accuracy issues, false alerts, cost and deployment ...

HP Autonomy Fraud Claims on Nov 20, 2012
Massive fraud is revealed in a superstar analytics company -- a lesson that all of us in surveill...


Most Recent Industry Updates

Milestone / OnSSI Break Up, Go To War on Sep 04, 2015
Forget about a smooth transition. Earlier this year, OnSSI, a long-time Milestone partner / OEM,...

Avigilon CEO: At What Point Do You Take the Blame And Resign Yourself? on Sep 03, 2015
The shots at Avigilon continue. After ousting their COO, Avigilon's CEO went on a Canadian finan...

Avigilon COO Schmode OUSTED on Sep 02, 2015
IPVM called for Avigilon's COO to be fired last week. Today, he is gone. In this note, we exami...

Sorry Manufacturers, ADI Is Beefing Up W Box on Sep 01, 2015
More bad news for manufacturers. Not only is Hikvision and Dahua driving the price of surveillan...

DVTel Hires Avigilon and Genetec Sales Leaders on Aug 28, 2015
DVTel Raised $9 Million this year and now they are starting to put that money to work, hiring sal...

Panasonic's Video Insight Really Really Wants To Take Over Your VMS on Aug 25, 2015
Video Insight has always been aggressive. And after being acquired by Panasonic this year, they ...

Camera Calculator Data Export Released on Aug 25, 2015
Pick the manufacturer and model you want. Name the camera. Add notes. Get the right FoV, coverag...

Here's What Avigilon Should Do Now on Aug 24, 2015
An Avigilon partner asked: "What would be your Goal if you run Avigilon?" Given Avigilon's 60% ...

$28 Million Funding for Doorbell Cam Startup on Aug 21, 2015
Yep. Would you spend $200 to see who it at your door on your phone? Well, investors, including ...

The Next Failure in Wireless Video Surveillance: $18 Million Funding on Aug 21, 2015
Wireless video surveillance is one of the most difficult niches in the industry. Tens of million...