X
Get all access to the world's best video surveillance information.
Free-book-promo-680-70

FAILED: Facial Recognition & Boston Bombing

Facial recognition vendors have been tripping over themselves to take credit, insert or claim the wonders of their offerings to identify the Boston bombers. However, an excellent Washington Post investigative report cites Boston's Police Commissioner, confirming that:

"Facial-recognition software did not identify the men in the ball caps. The technology came up empty even though both Tsarnaevs’ images exist in official databases."

So what solved the case? A lot of:

"Work [that] was painstaking and mind-numbing: One agent watched the same segment of video 400 times."

Plus, a critical tip from a victim who had seen the bomber face to face:

"FBI agents quickly came to Bauman’s bedside. A man in sunglasses and black baseball cap had walked right up to him, placed a black backpack on the ground and stepped away, Bauman remembered.

His tip became a critical lead, according to law enforcement officials."

A story that should be about the around the clock work of human investigators and the resolve of a man whose legs were torn off has been turned into a promotional campaign for technology vendors.

Technical Barriers to Facial Recognition

The images captured on the street, both from surveillance cameras and smartphones, were not good enough to deliver high accuracy matching. Recall the video from the Lord & Taylor's surveillance cameras, excerpt below:

There's too much downtilt plus the subjects are tending to look the other way, plus the pixel density is too low (standard definition camera with a ~15 foot wide FoV). And obviously the other suspect (#1) was wearing a forward facing cap and sunglasses, causing even more problems.

Note, this does not mean the cameras deployed were necessarily 'bad'. They are sufficient for general monitoring but not for the radically more demanding needs of facial recognition.

Only 'Hollywood' make believe facial recognition could use this.

Ironically, the images from smartphones were of better suitability for facial recognition than surveillance cameras. Here's an excerpt from one of the best ones:

This is obviously from a much wider FoV and the resulting pixel density is too low to deliver accurate facial matching. A fuzzy image of a face may be 'easy' for a human to verify against a specific person/photo but ask a computer to do this against millions of images and it becomes an exercise in futility.


Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 20, 2013
Comments (19): PRO Members only. Login. or Join.



Other Updates on Video Analytics

ioimage / DVTel Analytic Updates on Feb 20, 2014
In the 4 years since DVTel Acquired ioimage, they have gone quiet but upcoming new products combi...

This Company is "Going To Change the Video Surveillance Market Forever" on Oct 17, 2013
Stop emailing me about this company. All of you. Seriously. In a brilliant marketing campaign, a...

Failed: Surveillance Tech Predictions on Jun 08, 2013
Days before 9/11, MIT's Technology Review released a tour de force review of surveillance technol...

Future of Facial Recognition on May 04, 2013
The Boston Bombings reaffirmed how far facial recognition needs to develop to be an effective sur...

Successful Facial Surveillance Case on Jan 07, 2013
Real time facial surveillance is hard to do - accuracy issues, false alerts, cost and deployment ...

HP Autonomy Fraud Claims on Nov 20, 2012
Massive fraud is revealed in a superstar analytics company -- a lesson that all of us in surveill...

Bad News for Face Recognition (FTC) on Oct 22, 2012
Cold water is being thrown on renewed dreams of using facial recognition and demographic analysis...

License Plate Recognition (LPR) Providers Overview on Oct 09, 2012
License Plate Recognition is the most successful of all video analytic systems (sure, faint prais...

LPR Privacy Problems Reviewed on Oct 02, 2012
The Wall Street Journal has released a detailed investigative report that raises significant conc...


Most Recent Industry Updates

$3,000 Per Classroom School Camera System on Apr 16, 2014
Cameras in schools are nearly everywhere but inside classrooms? Far less common. A school distri...

German Anti-Surveillance Campaign Coming to US on Apr 15, 2014
The German Pirate Party recently created an anti surveillance campaign that focuses on the securi...

The $12 Billion Video Surveillance Manufacturer on Apr 15, 2014
What video surveillance manufacturer is worth a staggering $12 billion USD? How about Avigilon? ...

Requiring Video Surveillance At Gas Stations on Apr 14, 2014
A crowd mobbed and beat a man into a coma after the man accidently ran over a 10 year old boy nea...

Access Control New Products Spring 2014 on Apr 14, 2014
With surveillance dissapointing, access control dominanted the top awards at ISC West. Of course,...

Company Settles Charges Of Using CCTV To Look at Women's Breasts on Apr 11, 2014
A company was ordered to pay a female employee $11,000 after an investigation found that the owne...

Mapping IPVM Members from 100+ Countries on Apr 11, 2014
This map shows the locations of IPVM PRO members throughout the world. The map is based on mem...

Access Control Course - Spring 2014 on Apr 11, 2014
Registration is now closed. Our next IPVM access control course will meet live online, startin...

Best in Show 2014: SV3 Examined on Apr 10, 2014
ISC West 2014's top new product prize went to relative unknown Building Intelligence's SV3 Entry ...

American Camera OEM / Online Retailer Interviewed on Apr 10, 2014
A little-known company produced a marketing video comparing its cameras to Chinese giants Dahua a...