Top 3 Problems Limiting the Use and Growth of Video Analytics

Author: John Honovich, Published on Jun 18, 2008

While video analytics holds great promise, people are still asking about the viability of using analytics in the real world. Indeed, as stories of video analytic problems have spread, concerns about the risks of video analytics now seem higher than a few years ago when the novelty of the technology spurred wide excitement.

This article surveys the main problems limiting the use and growth of video analytics. It is meant to help security managers and integrators gain a better sense of the core issues involved.

Top 3 Problems:

  1. Eliminating False Alerts
  2. System Maintenance Too Difficult
  3. Cost of System Too High

Eliminating False Alerts

Since the goal of video analytics is to eliminate human involvement, eliminating false alerts is necessary to accomplish this. Each false alerts not only requires a human assessment, it increases emotional and organizational frustration with the system.

Most are familiar with burglar alarm false alarms and the frustration these causes. On average, burglar alarm false alarm per house or business are fairly rare. If you have 1 or 2 per month, that is fairly high. Many people do not experience false alarms of their burglar system for months.

By contrast, many video analytic systems can generate dozens of false alarms per day. This creates a far greater issue than anything one is accustomed to with burglar alarms. Plus, with such alarms happening many times throughout the day, it can become an operational burden.

Now, not all video analytics systems generate lots of false alarms but many do. These issues have been the number one issue limitation of the integrators and end-users that I know using and trying video analytics.

System Maintenance Too Difficult

System maintenance is a often overlooked and somewhat hidden issue in video analytics.

Sign Up for the IPVM Newsletter
Sign Up for the IPVM Newsletter

Over a period of weeks or months, a video analytic system's false alerts can start rising considerably due to changes in the environment, weather and the position of the sun. This can suddenly and surprisingly cause major problems with the system.

Not only is the increase in false alerts a problem, the risk now that the system could unexpectedly break in the future creates a significant problem in trust. If your perimeter surveillance one day stops functioning properly, you now have a serious flaw in your overall security plan.

This has been a cause of a number of video analytic system failures. The systems, already purchased, simply get put to the side becoming a very expensive testament to not buying or referring one's colleagues to video analytics.

This being said, not all video analytic systems exhibit this behavior but you would be prudent to carefully check references to verify that existing systems have been operating for a long period of time without any major degradation.

Cost of System Too High

While you can find inexpensive video analytic systems today, these system tend to exhibit problems 1 and 2, high false alerts and poor system maintenance. Indeed, in my experience, video analytic systems that are either free or only cost $100-$200 more generally have significant operational problems.

One common feature of systems that work is that the complete price for hardware and software is usually $500 or more per channel for the analytics. Now just because a video analytic systems is expensive obviously does not mean it is good. However, there are necessary costs in building a systems that is robust and works well in the real world.

The cost of video analytic systems comes in making them robust to real world conditions that we all take for granted. The developer needs to make the video analytic system “intelligent” enough to handle differences in lighting, depth, position of the sun, weather, etc. Doing this involves building more complex or sophisticated programs. Such programs almost always require significantly more computing hardware to execute and significant more capital investment in writing, testing and optimizing the program. All of these clearly increase costs.

The challenge is that it is basically impossible to see this from marketing demonstrations because from a demo all systems invariably look exactly alike. This of course has the vicious effect of encouraging people to choose cheaper systems that are more likely to generate high false alerts and be unmaintainable.

If you select a system that works, the cost per camera can make it difficult to justify the expense. Indeed, so much of the first generation video analytic deployments, came from government grant money, essentially making the cost secondary or not relevant. Nevertheless, for video analytics to grow in the private sector, they will not only need to work they will need to generate financial return.

When video analytics allow for guard reduction or reduce high value frequent losses, it is easy to justify and you see companies having success here (in terms of publicly documented cases, IoImage is the leader here). For other cases, where humans are not being eliminated, the individual loss is small or the occurrence of loss is low, the cost can be a major barrier.

Conclusion

Though I anticipate video analytics successes to increase, I believe such success will be constrained to applications where the loss characteristics and/or the human reduction costs are high. While analytics will certainly become cheaper, such cost decreases will take time and in the interim, it is these high value applications where analytics can gain a foothold of success.


4 reports cite this report:

Do Video Analytics Work? - Survey on Aug 11, 2009
The question, "Do Video Analytics Work?" is currently receiving a lot of attention. Such a question can be asked both technically and as a matter...
How much does Video Surveillance Cost? on Jan 11, 2009
This report provides rough estimated prices for video surveillance products and systems including cameras, video management systems, video...
Texas Instruments Simplifying Smart Cameras on Dec 06, 2008
To date, smart cameras are more promise than reality. While smart cameras receive significant press and a number of products are available,...
Video Analytic's Greatest Value - Storage Reduction on Sep 07, 2008
While video analytic promotion focuses on stopping and solving crime, the greatest value for video analytics historically and for the immediate...

Other Reports on Video Analytics

Mark Cuban Funded Analytics Company Shifts Away From Security on May 10, 2016
In early 2015 Mark Cuban has funded a video analytics company, Netra, after the founder cold-emailed him. Now the company has shifted away from...
Axis Video Analytics Are Weak on Oct 05, 2015
For more than a decade, video analytics has frustrated and disappointed users. Now, Axis has released their own "series of robust video analytics...
Bosch Person / Car / Bike / Truck Analytics Tested on Jun 05, 2015
Automatically identify what objects are persons vs cars vs bikes vs trucks. That is the new feature and claim from Bosch in their newest IVA...
iCetena - This Company Claims to Do What BRS Labs Claims to Do on Nov 10, 2014
In the US, BRS Labs has been the poster boy for outsized marketing. However, BRS Labs' core claim of behavorial recognition does have value if it...
Gun Detection Analytics Are Here, Says Startup on Jul 03, 2014
A timely innovation, or cashing in on tragedies? A new video analytics company is touting its 'gun detection' analytics that can trigger as soon...
Video Analytics Market Guide and Favorities 2014 on Mar 03, 2014
For more than a decade, video analytics has been the great hope for the surveillance industry. Indeed, it remains the pick as the Next Big...
ioimage / DVTel Analytic Updates on Feb 20, 2014
In the 4 years since DVTel Acquired ioimage, they have gone quiet but upcoming new products combined with the VideoIQ acquistion could be giving a...
Testing Color Analytics Performance on Dec 16, 2013
In an industry known for overhyping its own value, color analytics have been considered pure science fiction, with few, if any, stories from the...
VMD Camera Shootout on Oct 28, 2013
Video motion detection's inaccuracy can have disastrous effects on your VMS system, with recordings due to positives easily consuming far more...
Analytics vs Rain: Axis, Bosch & Sony on Oct 21, 2013
Rain. This was a key objection to our Camera Analytics Test: Axis vs. Bosch vs. Sony. Members rightfully noted it is one thing for an analytics to...

Most Recent Industry Reports

Avigilon Exec Out, New Exec Aims to Improve Communications on May 27, 2016
On the one hand, yet another Avigilon executive is out. On the other, this may mark a change in Avigilon's communications strategy and ability to...
ADI Now 'Manufacturing' Metal Detectors on May 27, 2016
ADI aims to be far more than just a distributor. ADI launched W-Box which started as a collection of basic "everyday" products - low-cost cameras,...
Negotiating Discounts From Manufacturers on May 26, 2016
Is there room for just a little more discount in your purchase order?   This report outlines some common tactics that often work, and do not work,...
Ring Pro Tested on May 26, 2016
This year, Ring received $61.2 million more of VC funding. For a video doorbell. The video doorbell market is evidently hot but how good are...
US Government Entities Hard Spec Hikvision on May 26, 2016
The US and Chinese governments are working together. Now, US government entities are not only buying video surveillance products from the Chinese...
Poorly Written College Town Camera RFP Examined on May 25, 2016
State College, PA issued an RFP for a neighborhood surveillance system that leaves out many key details required to invite qualified bids. We...
Camera Calculator - 5 New Improvements Released on May 25, 2016
The incredibly popular IPVM Camera Calculator has added a number of improvements. Corridor Mode Support Now, the calculator will show you what...
Arecont Stellar Camera Tested on May 25, 2016
Arecont offers:  STELLAR (Spatio TEmporal Low Light ARchitecture) technology that dramatically increases low light performance to capture color...
Weekly Sales Meetings Are Harmful on May 24, 2016
Sales managers under pressure often resort to weekly team meetings as a way to try and drive revenue and keep the sales team on track. This...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact