X
Get all access to the world's best video surveillance information.
Logo 8fbbe83a6ce128d4940dbb3787cc2aeaf3d9938b15d0b711b17d116501531882
2016 book promo

Top 3 Problems Limiting the Use and Growth of Video Analytics

Author: John Honovich, Published on Jun 18, 2008

While video analytics holds great promise, people are still asking about the viability of using analytics in the real world. Indeed, as stories of video analytic problems have spread, concerns about the risks of video analytics now seem higher than a few years ago when the novelty of the technology spurred wide excitement.

This article surveys the main problems limiting the use and growth of video analytics. It is meant to help security managers and integrators gain a better sense of the core issues involved.

Top 3 Problems:

  1. Eliminating False Alerts
  2. System Maintenance Too Difficult
  3. Cost of System Too High

Eliminating False Alerts

Since the goal of video analytics is to eliminate human involvement, eliminating false alerts is necessary to accomplish this. Each false alerts not only requires a human assessment, it increases emotional and organizational frustration with the system.

Most are familiar with burglar alarm false alarms and the frustration these causes. On average, burglar alarm false alarm per house or business are fairly rare. If you have 1 or 2 per month, that is fairly high. Many people do not experience false alarms of their burglar system for months.

By contrast, many video analytic systems can generate dozens of false alarms per day. This creates a far greater issue than anything one is accustomed to with burglar alarms. Plus, with such alarms happening many times throughout the day, it can become an operational burden.

Now, not all video analytics systems generate lots of false alarms but many do. These issues have been the number one issue limitation of the integrators and end-users that I know using and trying video analytics.

System Maintenance Too Difficult

System maintenance is a often overlooked and somewhat hidden issue in video analytics.

Over a period of weeks or months, a video analytic system's false alerts can start rising considerably due to changes in the environment, weather and the position of the sun. This can suddenly and surprisingly cause major problems with the system.

Not only is the increase in false alerts a problem, the risk now that the system could unexpectedly break in the future creates a significant problem in trust. If your perimeter surveillance one day stops functioning properly, you now have a serious flaw in your overall security plan.

This has been a cause of a number of video analytic system failures. The systems, already purchased, simply get put to the side becoming a very expensive testament to not buying or referring one's colleagues to video analytics.

This being said, not all video analytic systems exhibit this behavior but you would be prudent to carefully check references to verify that existing systems have been operating for a long period of time without any major degradation.

Cost of System Too High

While you can find inexpensive video analytic systems today, these system tend to exhibit problems 1 and 2, high false alerts and poor system maintenance. Indeed, in my experience, video analytic systems that are either free or only cost $100-$200 more generally have significant operational problems.

One common feature of systems that work is that the complete price for hardware and software is usually $500 or more per channel for the analytics. Now just because a video analytic systems is expensive obviously does not mean it is good. However, there are necessary costs in building a systems that is robust and works well in the real world.

The cost of video analytic systems comes in making them robust to real world conditions that we all take for granted. The developer needs to make the video analytic system “intelligent” enough to handle differences in lighting, depth, position of the sun, weather, etc. Doing this involves building more complex or sophisticated programs. Such programs almost always require significantly more computing hardware to execute and significant more capital investment in writing, testing and optimizing the program. All of these clearly increase costs.

The challenge is that it is basically impossible to see this from marketing demonstrations because from a demo all systems invariably look exactly alike. This of course has the vicious effect of encouraging people to choose cheaper systems that are more likely to generate high false alerts and be unmaintainable.

If you select a system that works, the cost per camera can make it difficult to justify the expense. Indeed, so much of the first generation video analytic deployments, came from government grant money, essentially making the cost secondary or not relevant. Nevertheless, for video analytics to grow in the private sector, they will not only need to work they will need to generate financial return.

When video analytics allow for guard reduction or reduce high value frequent losses, it is easy to justify and you see companies having success here (in terms of publicly documented cases, IoImage is the leader here). For other cases, where humans are not being eliminated, the individual loss is small or the occurrence of loss is low, the cost can be a major barrier.

Conclusion

Though I anticipate video analytics successes to increase, I believe such success will be constrained to applications where the loss characteristics and/or the human reduction costs are high. While analytics will certainly become cheaper, such cost decreases will take time and in the interim, it is these high value applications where analytics can gain a foothold of success.


4 reports cite this report:

Do Video Analytics Work? - Survey on Aug 11, 2009
The question, "Do Video Analytics Work?" is currently receiving a lot of attention. Such a questi...

How much does Video Surveillance Cost? on Jan 11, 2009
This report provides rough estimated prices for video surveillance products and systems including...

Texas Instruments Simplifying Smart Cameras on Dec 06, 2008
To date, smart cameras are more promise than reality. While smart cameras receive significant pre...

Video Analytic's Greatest Value - Storage Reduction on Sep 07, 2008
While video analytic promotion focuses on stopping and solving crime, the greatest value for vide...

Other Reports on Video Analytics

Axis Video Analytics Are Weak on Oct 05, 2015
For more than a decade, video analytics has frustrated and disappointed users. Now, Axis has rel...

Bosch Person / Car / Bike / Truck Analytics Tested on Jun 05, 2015
Automatically identify what objects are persons vs cars vs bikes vs trucks. That is the new featu...

Mark Cuban Funded Video Analytics Company - Netra on Mar 06, 2015
Mark Cuban has funded a video analytics, the second Texas billionaire to take a stake in a survei...

iCetena - This Company Claims to Do What BRS Labs Claims to Do on Nov 10, 2014
In the US, BRS Labs has been the poster boy for outsized marketing. However, BRS Labs' core clai...

Gun Detection Analytics Are Here, Says Startup on Jul 03, 2014
A timely innovation, or cashing in on tragedies? A new video analytics company is touting its 'g...

Market Guide and Favorite Video Analytics 2014 on Mar 03, 2014
For more than a decade, video analytics has been the great hope for the surveillance industry. In...

ioimage / DVTel Analytic Updates on Feb 20, 2014
In the 4 years since DVTel Acquired ioimage, they have gone quiet but upcoming new products combi...

Testing Color Analytics Performance on Dec 16, 2013
In an industry known for overhyping its own value, color analytics have been considered pure scie...

VMD Camera Shootout on Oct 28, 2013
Video motion detection's inaccuracy can have disastrous effects on your VMS system, with recordin...

Analytics vs Rain: Axis, Bosch & Sony on Oct 21, 2013
Rain. This was a key objection to our Camera Analytics Test: Axis vs. Bosch vs. Sony. Members rig...


Most Recent Industry Reports

Axis Is In Denial About HD Analog on Feb 08, 2016
For more than a decade, Axis' #1 argument against analog has been no HD. This, of course, is no...

Surveillance Commissioning / Install Checklist on Feb 08, 2016
This 60+ point checklist helps end users, integrators and consultants verify that installation is...

Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2016 on Feb 08, 2016
The market has changed significantly since 2014, where our previous Favorite Camera Manufacturer ...

Mega Chinese Electronics Manufactuer Xiaomi Yi Camera Tested on Feb 05, 2016
Xiaomi's revenue is 4 to 5 times larger than Hikvision's. Only in business for 5 years, Xiaomi ha...

Trade Mag Admits 84% Prefer Online Over Print on Feb 05, 2016
Some say the industry is so old and conservative that print is still important. Well, even a pri...

Hikvision Video Analytics Tested on Feb 04, 2016
We tested Hikvision's video analytics on six Hikvision models, ranging from entry level to high e...

Last Chance - IP Networking Course on Feb 04, 2016
Our most popular course starts next week (February 9th), with all new training of network securit...

Add Your Preferred Camera Manufacturer to the Calculator on Feb 03, 2016
One of the most popular features of our Camera Calculator is choosing specific models. Indeed, me...

Axis vs Avigilon vs FLIR vs Hikvision vs Samsung Camera Pricing on Feb 03, 2016
The 'race to the bottom' is a big issue, with average prices dropping sharply over the past few y...

Network Security for IP Video Surveillance Guide 2016 on Feb 03, 2016
Keeping surveillance networks secure can be a daunting task, but there are several methods that c...