X
Get all access to the world's best video surveillance information.
Logo 8fbbe83a6ce128d4940dbb3787cc2aeaf3d9938b15d0b711b17d116501531882
2016 book promo

MJPEG vs. H.264

Author: John Honovich, Published on Apr 17, 2009

Recently, IQinVision releaed an article advocating benefits of MJPEG.

[Update Dec 2010: We conducted extensive testing comparing MJPEG and H.264. Read our Test Results of MJPEG vs H.264.]

While I found the article technically accurate, well written and worth reading, the nature of the application and its economics demand that MJPEG be almost always avoided. Since H.264 is hot right now, this is a popular claim to make. However, a discussion of this can help examine the economics and operational drivers driving this interest.

Jason's central claims are:

1. With moving cameras or images of high activity areas, MPEG4 and H.264 provide little bandwidth savings relative to MJPEG.

2. Proper network design requires factoring in worse case scenarios so you will need to dedicate the same amount of bandwidth whether or not you use MJPEG, MPEG4 or H.264.

3. MJPEG provides higher quality because of no intra-frame compression.

4. Unlike MJPEG, with MPEG-4 vendors deviate from standards, increasing potential integation costs.

My counterpoints are:

1. For most users, cameras usually have low or modest activity, translating into significant savings for MPEG-4 or H.264. Most cameras in the world are fixed. Most cameras have significant periods during the day when there is little or no motion (nights, weekends, etc.) Even within PTZs, PTZs are often left at a home position, or iterate over a series of pre-sets stopping for 5 - 10 seconds each.

2. Many, perhaps most organizations, do not set network bandwidth budgets for worst case scenarios. Sometimes, organizations don't want to pay the money for the extra capacity but sometimes it can't be done due to constraints of reutilizing existing infrastructure (very common in wireless networks). In other words, organizations generally trade-off infrequent pixelization for immediate cost savings. Maybe this is 'objectively' wrong but this is common.

2a. Jason does not discuss storage but storage is a HUGE economic driver in the move away from MJPEG. I have had a number of occasions where my DVR/NVR with a 1TB hard drive was only recording for 13 days. Why? I had forgot we recently integrated just a few megapixel cameras using MJPEG. Let's say we can save 1 Mb/s by switching from MJPEG to MPEG4. Over a two month period, for one camera, that is 650 GBs. It would cost you $300 to $600 to add that much storage for each MJPEG camera.

3. As for quality, the difference in quality is usually close enough that most customers are ok with it, especially for the savings.

4. The issue with deviation from standards is generally a one-time cost/problem that can be amortized by the manufacturer over many different customers. In the larger scheme of things, it's mainly a nuisance.

In sum, then, the economics of reducing network and storage costs are usually very significant budgetary and operational factors that drive purchasing decisions. With megapixel manufacturers starting to announce H.264 support, it will be interesting to see what IQinVision does.



Other Reports on IQinVision

Testing Varifocal Minidome (IQeye) on Jul 02, 2014
Minidomes are increasing in popularity, as IPVM statistics show. However, the most common objecti...

Fail / Fail: The IQinVision - Vicon Merger on Mar 31, 2014
One was a leader 20 years ago. The other a decade. Both have fallen far in recent years. The sol...

New IQeye 7 Series (76x) on Feb 02, 2012
IQinVision has announced the latest release in the revamping of their camera line, with an update...

IQinVision IQeye 3 Series Cameras Examined on Dec 13, 2011
IQinVision has announced the addition of the IQeye 3 series cameras to their line. This new line ...

IQinVision Management Shakeup Examined on Sep 12, 2011
Two weeks ago, in the original version of this note, we examined a number of key challenges at IQ...

IQinVision New Sentinel HD Examined on Aug 20, 2011
In this update, we examine the latest release from megapixel camera manufacturer IQinVision, an u...

Debunking IQinVision's Green Calculator on May 01, 2011
IQinVision has been promoting its Green Calculator as a means to demonstrate significant operatio...

Examining IQinVision's Alliance-mx Series H.264 Megapixel Cameras on Oct 04, 2010
IQinVision will be offering SD, 720p, and 1080p resolution H.264 IP dome cameras in an all weathe...

Testing IQinVision's 4 Series and PSIA Integration on Feb 02, 2010
IP camera standards are a hot topic. Determining how, when and with whom these 'standards' will w...

H.264 Objections Considered on Dec 09, 2009
IQinVision has released a 2 page document with a list of objections and issues when using H.264 c...


Most Recent Industry Reports

Average Frame Rate Video Surveillance 2016 on Feb 11, 2016
What is the average frame rated used in video surveillance systems? Historically, 30fps has been...

Goodbye Dropcam, the $50 Home Security Camera Era Is Here on Feb 10, 2016
Remember those days not too long ago where a $200 home security camera with a $100 per year for s...

Hikvision H.264+ Tested on Feb 10, 2016
Is 'regular' H.264 soon to be a thing of the past? Last year, Axis started the 'smart' H.264 tre...

Camera Coverage Areas on Feb 10, 2016
How wide and far on an area can a camera cover? A fundamental metric in analyzing this is pixel...

US Capital Paying for Homes and Business to Get Security Cameras on Feb 09, 2016
Since 9/11, US cities have spent hundreds of millions collectively on city-wide video surveillanc...

Brivo Access Control Company Profile on Feb 09, 2016
This is our 9th in a series of access control company profiles. In this entry, we cover Brivo. P...

Axis Is In Denial About HD Analog on Feb 08, 2016
For more than a decade, Axis' #1 argument against analog has been no HD. This, of course, is no...

Surveillance Commissioning / Install Checklist on Feb 08, 2016
This 60+ point checklist helps end users, integrators and consultants verify that installation is...

Favorite Camera Manufacturers 2016 on Feb 08, 2016
The market has changed significantly since 2014, where our previous Favorite Camera Manufacturer ...

Mega Chinese Electronics Manufactuer Xiaomi Yi Camera Tested on Feb 05, 2016
Xiaomi's revenue is 4 to 5 times larger than Hikvision's. Only in business for 5 years, Xiaomi ha...