X
Get all access to the world's best video surveillance information.
Logo 8fbbe83a6ce128d4940dbb3787cc2aeaf3d9938b15d0b711b17d116501531882
2016 book promo

Bandwidth Tutorial for IP Video Surveillance Systems

Author: John Honovich, Published on Jan 07, 2012

When using IP cameras and video management systems, understanding the basics about bandwidth availability and demands is critical to planning, designing and deploying systems. Everyone in the industry should have an understanding of the basics as bandwidth is a critical factor in video surveillance

This article is focused for a non-IT audience such as security managers, electronic technicians, sales and marketing folks. I am purposely ignoring details and edge cases to help a broader audience better understand the basics.

[UPDATED: This is a 2012 revision of the original article from 2008 that reflects changes in IP camera usage.]

How Much Bandwidth is Available?

To determine bandwidth availability, you first need to determine what locations you are communicating between. Much like driving, you will have a starting point and destination. For example, from your branch office to your headquarters. However, unlike driving, the amount of bandwidth available can range dramatically depending on where you are going.

The most important factor in determining how much bandwidth is available is whether or not you need connectivity between two different buildings. For instance:

  • In the Same Building - Lots of Bandwidth: 70Mb/s to 700 Mb/s of bandwidth is generally available
  • Between Different Buildings - Scarce Bandwidth: 0.5 Mb/s to 5 Mb/s of bandwidth is generally available

The amount of bandwidth available going from your office to a co-worker's office in the same building can be 200 times more than the bandwidth from your office to a branch office down the block.

This is true in 90% or more cases. Note the following exceptions:

  • If these are different buildings but on the same campus, more bandwidth may be available.
  • If you are in a central business district of a major city, more bandwidth may be available.
  • If you are a telecommunications or research company, more bandwidth may be available.

Different Buildings

The key driver in bandwidth availability is the cost increase of deploying networks between buildings. Generally referred to as the Wide Area Network or WAN, this type of bandwidth is usually provided by telecommunications companies. One common example is cable modem or DSL, which can provide anywhere from .5 Mb/s to 5 Mb/s at $20 to $50 per month. Another example is a T1, which provides 1.5Mb/s for about $300 to $600 per month. Above this level, bandwidth generally becomes very expensive. In most locations, getting 10Mb/s of bandwidth can cost thousands per month.

Many talk about fiber (sometimes called FTTH/FTTC) but fiber to the building is not and will not be widely available for years. Fiber to the home or to the business promises to reduce the cost of bandwidth significantly. Nevertheless, it is very expensive to deploy and despite excited discussions for the last decade or more, progress remains slow. If you have it great, but do not assume it.

Same Buildings

By contrast, bandwidth inside of buildings (or campuses) is quite plentiful because the install costs are quite low. Non technical users can easily set up a 1,000 Mb/s networks inside a building (aka Local Area Networks or LANs) for less than $1,000 installation cost with no monthly costs. Contrast this to the WAN, where the same bandwidth could cost tens of thousands of dollars per month.

The cost of deploying networks in buildings are low because there are minimal to no construction expenses. When you are building a network across a city, you need to get rights of ways, trench, install on telephone poles, etc. These are massive projects that can easily demand millions or billions of dollars in up front expenses. By contrast, inside a building, the cables can often by quickly and simply fished through ceilings (not the professional way to do it but the way many people do it in deployments).

Wireless

A lot of discussion about wireless (WiMax, WiFi, 3G, etc) exists but wireless will not provide significantly greater bandwidth nor significantly better costs than DSL or cable modem. As such, wireless will not solve the expense and limitations of bandwidth between buildings. That being said, wireless absolutely has benefits for mobility purposes and connecting to remote locations that DSL or cable modem cannot cost effectively serve.

Simple point to point wireless links have become inexpensive but are limited in where they can be used. Today, 50-100 Mb/s wireless connections for a few hundred dollars are feasible (excluding installation). However, these only can be used when clear line of sight is available. This helps when you want to locate a camera 100 meters away in a parking lot but not if you want to transmit across a city.

How Much Bandwidth Do IP Cameras Consume?

For the bandwidth consumption of an IP camera, use 1-2 Mb/s as a rough rule of thumb. Many factors impact total bandwidth consumption. You can certainly stream an IP camera as low as .2 Mb/s (or 200 Kb/s) and others as high as 6 Mb/s. In 2012, the most typical IP camera being deployed are HD (720p or 1080p) using the H.264 codec at about 6-10fps. With this configuration, bandwidth consumption will be in the range of 1-2 Mb/s. Of course, the more resolution and greater frame rate you want, the more bandwidth will be used.

What Does this Mean for my IP Video System?

Just like dealing with personal finance, we can now figure out what we can 'afford':

  • Between Buildings: We have .5 Mb/s to 5 Mb/s to 'spend'
  • Inside Buildings: We have 70 Mb/s to 700 Mb/s to 'spend'
  • IP cameras: Cost us 1-2 Mb/s each

Using these points, we can quickly see what combination of IP and megapixel cameras we can use between buildings or inside of buildings.

  1. Inside of buildings, it is easy to stream numerous IP and megapixel cameras.
  2. Between buildings, it is almost impossible to stream numerous IP and megapixel cameras.

Because of this situation, the standard configuration one sees in IP Video systems is:

  • A local recorder at each building/remote site. The local recorder receives the streams from the building and stores them.
  • The local recorder only forwards the streams (live or recorded) off-site when a user specifically wants to view video. Rather than overloading the WAN network with unrealistic bandwidth demands all day long, bandwidth is only consumed when a user wants to watch. Generally, remote viewing is sporadic and IP video coexists nicely with the expensive Wide Area Network.
  • The local recorder has built-in features to reduce the bandwidth needed to stream video to remote clients. Most systems have the ability to reduce the frame rate of the live video stream or to dynamically reduce the video quality to ensure that the video system does not overload the network and that remote viewers can actually see what is going on the other side. Generally, the live video stream is sufficient to identify the basic threat. In any event, bandwidth is generally so costly, especially the upstream bandwidth needed to send to a remote viewer, that this is the best financial decision.

Conclusion

Knowing how much bandwidth is available and how much bandwidth IP cameras consume are key elements in planning and deploying viable IP video systems. Though this is simply a broad survey, my hope is that this helps identify fundamental elements in understanding the impact of bandwidth on IP video.

2 reports cite this report:

Is Bandwidth a Problem for IP Cameras? on Mar 21, 2009
Integrators often cite bandwidth as a key concern for deploying IP cameras. Let's examine what th...

IT Tutorial for Physical Security Managers on Feb 07, 2009
Much of the fear in IT convergence comes from new technology and operational issues of using IT f...

Other Reports on Convergence

IP Networking Course Fall 2015 (CLOSED) on Oct 08, 2015
This is the only networking course designed specifically for video surveillance professionals. T...

Why PSIM Will NEVER Be Popular on Jun 15, 2015
How do you like this vehicle? Big, ugly, hard to drive, terrible gas mileage, death trap - the...

Why Avaya Has Entered Video Surveillance on Oct 07, 2014
Avaya is best known as a VoIP spin off of former telecom giant Lucent, but this year they came to...

Network Guide for Video Surveillance on Sep 17, 2013
We have compiled this Network Guide that will be helpful for everyone in video surveillance, from...

Anixter, Citing Axis, Sets Industry Back Years on Mar 19, 2013
Anixter declares, "The biggest business driver is that an IP based solution is less expensive tha...

PSIM Ambulance Chasing in Brussels on Mar 03, 2013
Desperate, shady PSIM marketing tactics continue. Last month, $50 million of diamonds were stolen...

API / SDK Tutorial on Feb 07, 2013
While APIs are key to 'open' platforms, they are frequently misunderstood and over-hyped in physi...

No ROI For PSIM on Nov 29, 2012
PSIM is not a bad thing. It just has no ROI. Now, that is not unique as many security solutions o...

Who's #1 Online for Video Surveillance? on Oct 05, 2012
Who's #1 online for video surveillance? You'll never guess. I can pretty much guarantee that. Ar...

Internet Marketing for Integrators on Jul 28, 2012
Terrible best describes most integrator websites. Antiquated, wacky or generic are common descrip...


Most Recent Industry Reports

Mega Chinese Electronics Manufactuer Xiaomi Yi Camera Tested on Feb 05, 2016
Xiaomi's revenue is 4 to 5 times larger than Hikvision's. Only in business for 5 years, Xiaomi ha...

Trade Mag Admits 84% Prefer Online Over Print on Feb 05, 2016
Some say the industry is so old and conservative that print is still important. Well, even a pri...

Hikvision Video Analytics Tested on Feb 04, 2016
We tested Hikvision's video analytics on six Hikvision models, ranging from entry level to high e...

Last Chance - IP Networking Course on Feb 04, 2016
Today is the last day to get into the course. Our most popular course starts next week (February...

Add Your Preferred Camera Manufacturer to the Calculator on Feb 03, 2016
One of the most popular features of our Camera Calculator is choosing specific models. Indeed, me...

Axis vs Avigilon vs FLIR vs Hikvision vs Samsung Camera Pricing on Feb 03, 2016
The 'race to the bottom' is a big issue, with average prices dropping sharply over the past few y...

Network Security for IP Video Surveillance Guide 2016 on Feb 03, 2016
Keeping surveillance networks secure can be a daunting task, but there are several methods that c...

Resolution Usage Statistics 2016 on Feb 02, 2016
In the past few years, 4MP, 6MP, 4k (8.3MP) and 12MP cameras have become increasingly commonplace...

Avigilon H4 HD Cameras Released on Feb 01, 2016
Avigilon has announced a new generation of cameras, the H4. In this note, based on speaking with...

Honeywell Pro-Watch Access Control Profile on Feb 01, 2016
Inside we examine Honeywell Pro-Watch access control line: Comparing Honeywell to their compet...