Advantages of RAID6 over RAID5 For Video Surveillance

Author: Carl Lindgren, Published on Apr 15, 2009

For large scale video surveillance deployments, like casinos, the enhanced redundancy provided in RAID6 over RAID5 is critical to minimizing video loss and ensuring system performance. [Note: If you are not familiar with RAID, view a RAID tutorial and a general comparison between RAID5 and RAID6]

Background

We have been recording all of our cameras using an NVR system since late 2003. Our original system consisted of 28 servers, each recording up to 32 cameras. The servers originally used 16-bay RAIDs with 250GB drives in a RAID 5 configuration. The majority of the RAIDs were SCSI/PATA, which means they used standard IDE desktop drives in the RAID enclosure. These drives were not designed to handle continuous video recording and began to fail at an alarming rate within a year. Our drive vendor replaced these with RAID Edition drives in early 2005, which resolved some of the issues. At the time, we had a bit over 830 drives in use.

Drive Failures

Even after replacing all 830 drives, we still experienced drive failures. This is normal for any large system. It has been estimated that approximately 1% of installed hard drives will fail in the first year of operation; with that rate climbing as the drives age. There are many possible ways for hard drives to fail and RAID systems can recover from most failures by rebuilding the RAID system using the parity information that is striped across the drives.

RAID 5 uses one parity stripe to store data that can be used to reconstruct the contents of a failed drive onto a replacement drive. That is the reason why most RAID manufacturers recommend installing at least one global hot spare in each RAID chassis. When a RAID encounters an error with a hard drive, it “rebuilds” the data that was on the failed drive onto the spare using the parity data. The failed drive can then be replaced with a new drive; which is designated as the new hot spare. This process can be done over and over as drives fail and theoretically will keep the RAID storage operating continuously with no data lost.

Unfortunately, there are drive failure scenarios that can not be accommodated by most RAID storage systems that are used for recording video. This issue is unique to video recording and seldom surfaces in RAID systems used by other applications. The key is that for most applications, written data is “verified” during the write process. This means that after a piece of data is written, it is read and compared to the original data before the next piece is written. If the compare process fails, the area of the disk that failed is marked bad by the drive and the data is re-written to another area of the disk reserved for that purpose.

This process works well when the system has the time to verify the write and repair any errors encountered. For most applications, there is no requirement to write data continuously and the computer’s operating system can wait the relatively short period required to verify each write and relocate data if an error is encountered.

Video recording is a completely different animal. It has been estimated that CCTV video recording is 90% write versus 10% read. I am of the opinion that is a conservative estimate. An analysis of our system leads me to estimate that the percentages are somewhere between 99% to 1% and 99.9% to 0.01%. RAID systems set up for video recording seldom, if ever, are set up to verify the data as it is written.

This sets up a possibly fatal scenario. One of the failure modes of computer hard drives is something called “Read Element Failure”. The best definition I can find of that is the drive is unable to read all or part of the data written to it. This could be the result of a complete failure of one of the read heads, or just a bad area of a disk that has not been relocated by the drive’s automatic systems.

Sign Up for the IPVM Newsletter
Sign Up for the IPVM Newsletter

Since the drives in a video recording system don’t normally automatically read the data after it is written and the system operators only play back a very small fraction of the video being recorded, a drive could happily chug along writing data that is unreadable for a long time. Neither the system nor the operators would ever know that there is a problem. That is, until a drive fails with a problem that is recognized by the RAID system.

When the RAID system encounters a drive failure that it recognizes, it will attempt to rebuild the RAID set using the parity data recorded across all of the drives. That is where the problem becomes acute. If the RAID system also contains a drive that has a Read Element Failure, it is very possible that bad area contains parity data. If it does, the rebuild will fail.

On a RAID 5 system, if a rebuild fails because the parity data is corrupt or unreadable, the system now has two bad drives and the RAID set is lost. This happened to us at least six times during the three years that we used our original RAID 5 systems.

RAID 6

RAID 6 works a bit differently than RAID 5. Although it can encounter the same drive failure scenarios as RAID 5, its ability to recover from them is greatly enhanced by the method RAID 6 records the parity data. Instead of writing one parity stripe across all drives in a RAID set, RAID 6 writes two completely independent parity stripes. There are two advantages to this: RAID 6 is able to recover from the simultaneous failure of two drives in the enclosure and its two parity stripes are in different areas, allowing the system to read parity even through multiple failures.;

This has been proven by us in our recording environment. In 2006, we replaced all of our servers and RAIDs. Our new RAIDs were set up, at our insistence, as RAID 6. Although we have experienced at least three instances where two drives failed in an enclosure, including at least two instances where the second drive failed during the rebuild process, we have never lost any data. The systems rebuilt both failed drives and continued to run flawlessly.

Conclusion

For these reasons, I would never recommend using RAID 5 in a critical video recording environment. The risks of data loss are too great.

Carl Lindgren is the Surveillance Technician Manager for the Sycuan Gaming Commission at Sycuan Casino in El Cajon, CA. Carl can be emailed at clindgren@sycuan.com

1 report cite this report:

How Costly are Hard Drive Failures? on Apr 29, 2009
Storage tends to be one of the more costly and problematic parts of video surveillance systems. Most video surveillance systems, even today, do not...

Other Reports on Storage

Video Surveillance Storage Redundancy Statistics 2015 on Oct 27, 2015
100+ integrators answered "What percentage of your projects do you use redundancy or RAID for video surveillance storage? Why? What...
Importance of Storage Costs - Statistics on Mar 30, 2015
10 years ago, 500GB for an entire DVR was considered good. Today, there are 6TB hard drives. More and more storage at lower prices has lead many...
First Surveillance SD Cards Released (SanDisk) on Mar 12, 2015
The black eye for on-board recording has gotten pretty bad. Culminating with Axis admitting a serious edge recording problem, the claimed culprit...
Invest in a Video Surveillance Storage Startup on Nov 06, 2014
Did you miss out on making millions investing in Intransa or Pivot3? Well, here is a limited opportunity to get in on an up and coming video...
H.264 High vs Main vs Baseline Tested on Jun 27, 2014
In surveillance, H.264 is often considered a single 'thing' but there are many different sets of capabilities, called profiles, to choose...
Edge Storage Usage Statistics on Jun 05, 2014
Most IP camera models now support on-board storage. Even more promising, on-board storage has the potential to eliminate NVRs / centralized VMSes...
WD Purple and Seagate Surveillance Hard Drives on Feb 25, 2014
Western Digital wants our help marketing their new hard drives to "fly by night type folks", explaining to us that you could still be valuable...
Guaranteed Video Storage Calculation? Iomnis on Aug 20, 2013
Calculating video storage can be daunting, presenting a dilemma for integrators: underestimate storage and then eat the cost or specify too much...
3 Top Surveillance Improvements You Can Do on Nov 06, 2012
Here are 3 very valuable surveillance improvements you can do simply with existing equipment. While they are less known, we have validated them in...
Veracity Coldstore Overview on Jun 20, 2012
What if you could reduce your costs for buying storage, powering that storage while eliminating RAID rebuild concerns? That's the basic pitch of...

Most Recent Industry Reports

IP Cameras Default Passwords Directory on May 28, 2016
Finding an IP camera's default password can be tedious or aggravating. And keeping up with changes in newer firmwares can be difficult, especially...
Avigilon Exec Out, New Exec Aims to Improve Communications on May 27, 2016
On the one hand, yet another Avigilon executive is out. On the other, this may mark a change in Avigilon's communications strategy and ability to...
ADI Now 'Manufacturing' Metal Detectors on May 27, 2016
ADI aims to be far more than just a distributor. ADI launched W-Box which started as a collection of basic "everyday" products - low-cost cameras,...
LinkedIn's Emergence as a Video Surveillance Marketing Power on May 27, 2016
LinkedIn has become one of the most powerful marketing sources for both integrators and manufacturers, surpassing trade magazines, banner ads,...
Negotiating Discounts From Manufacturers on May 26, 2016
Is there room for just a little more discount in your purchase order?   This report outlines some common tactics that often work, and do not work,...
Ring Pro Tested on May 26, 2016
This year, Ring received $61.2 million more of VC funding. For a video doorbell. The video doorbell market is evidently hot but how good are...
US Government Entities Hard Spec Hikvision on May 26, 2016
The US and Chinese governments are working together. Now, US government entities are not only buying video surveillance products from the Chinese...
Poorly Written College Town Camera RFP Examined on May 25, 2016
State College, PA issued an RFP for a neighborhood surveillance system that leaves out many key details required to invite qualified bids. We...
Camera Calculator - 5 New Improvements Released on May 25, 2016
The incredibly popular IPVM Camera Calculator has added a number of improvements. Corridor Mode Support Now, the calculator will show you what...
Arecont Stellar Camera Tested on May 25, 2016
Arecont offers:  STELLAR (Spatio TEmporal Low Light ARchitecture) technology that dramatically increases low light performance to capture color...

The world's leading video surveillance information source, IPVM provides the best reporting, testing and training for 10,000+ members globally. Dedicated to independent and objective information, we uniquely refuse any and all advertisements, sponsorship and consulting from manufacturers.

About | FAQ | Contact