Should You Use Twitter for Security Monitoring?by John Honovich, IPVM posted on May 23, 2009 About John Contact John
Internet luminary Kevin Rose suggests that we cut out alarm monitoring companies through the use of low cost devices and sharing alerts via Twitter. Friends and neighbors can then monitor those alerts and respond appropriately. [Watch Kevin Rose's video explaining the concept.]
Certainly, Kevin taps into 3 compelling concerns:
- Alarm monitoring services are expensive - $500-$1000 USD per year
- They often sell based on fear
- The Internet makes monitoring much less expensive and more sophisticated
- Alarm monitoring companies provide extensive coverage indoors and outdoors that makes sure that the house is well protected; a DIY approach would likely leave major gaps in coverage
- Handling false alerts would likely overwhelm people responding (ie., "the Boy who Cried Wolf") since most alerts are false
- It's often hard to determine if an alert is an intruder or simply a friend, relative, etc. Responders at alarm monitoring companies have numbers/contacts and procedures to verify and assess such issues
- The idea can be implemented today with $100 IP cameras that use motion detection and support SMS/email. A moderately technical person could do this now and could deploy a poor man's 'alarm monitoring system'
- While free, crowdsourcing has problems, today's technology should easily generate new competition from much lower cost providers that use the Internet and self-monitoring to reduce costs yet provide some support and verification.
Most Recent Industry Reports
7 Quizzes - Test Your Co-Workers on Apr 14, 2014
A major new offering, now IPVM members can take a series of 7 quizzes, plus they can assign them to their co-workers who are also IPVM members. Make sure you truly are on top of surveillance ...
Super Low Lux Minidome Tested on Apr 10, 2014
'Super' low light cameras have become increasingly common in box and full size cameras. However, no one we know has offered them in a minidome, the most common form factor for many users, valu...
Testing 'Megapixel' Analog Camera on Mar 26, 2014
Megapixel analog sounds like a contradiction in terms. 'Analog' by definition, or at least in common use, is constrained by 60+ year old NTSC / PAL specifications and cannot be 'megapixel.' Howeve...
Ranking 95 Surveillance Manufacturers Interest on Mar 24, 2014
IPVM has ranked interest levels in 95 surveillance manufacturers from most to least. These are the companies covered: Over 400 IPVM members selected which of these companies they were interested...
2014 Surveillance Test Results Guide Released on Mar 19, 2014
Inside, get the 50 page IPVM 2014 Surveillance Test Results Guide and register for the 1 hour live webinar. In the past year, IPVM has spent thousands of hours conducting over 75 tests, representi...
Testing Pelco SureVision 2.0 on Mar 17, 2014
Pelco's new SureVision 2.0 line promises superior low light and wide dynamic range capabilities, claiming "industry-leading image quality in the most difficult lighting conditions." But does it del...
IPVM Site Improvements Directory on Mar 15, 2014
IPVM continuously develops new features and improvements. This document will serve as a directory of those, like 'release notes' but with more color and commentary. 2014 Site Improvements Added N...
Shootout: Megapixel vs Analog Cameras on Mar 12, 2014
How much does resolution really make a difference? For those purchasing budget or entry level systems, what, if any gain, does one get for higher resolution? In this test report, we did head to he...
Announcing News Monitoring Service on Mar 11, 2014
Now get weekly alerts on 110+ security companies, including new information from their websites as well as articles and discussions on them. This is the most powerful way to stay informed on the co...