IPVM Discussions Launchedby John Honovich, IPVM posted on Jan 21, 2013 About John Contact John
IPVM has launched its own discussion group, integrated within the IPVM site, with advanced features and ease of use. We can now help you even more and better facilitate feedback from thousands of other members. This note explains the key changes and benefits. Check out IPVM Discussions Now
Single Spot for Articles and Discussions
Previously, we had discussions hosted on LinkedIn, which made it difficult and confusing for the 75,000+ visitors per month to IPVM.com to find our discussions. This was especially challenging for those who do not regularly use LinkedIn. Now, as IPVM visitors read our posts, they can click right over to discussions and vice versa.
Single Sign-On For PRO Articles and Discussions
Previously, users had to log in separately for IPVM.com and for IPVM LinkedIn discussions (and of course have memberships for both). Now, IPVM PRO member login provides instant access to both IPVM articles and discussions. Even in the few week beta period, we have over 500 posts and 5,000 reads, a strong sign of adoption.
Stealth Comment Without Disclosing Your Identity
This is the biggest, and most novel, feature of the new system. On LinkedIn, everyone had to disclose their real name always. On other forums, people could completely hide their identities. By contrast, on IPVM discussions, the default will be real full names but members can hide their identities for specific comments. At the same time, we will know who the commenter is and can review if anything is improper.
Here's what it looks like and how you can enable it:
We think this is a huge benefit. Many individuals have a lot to lose by publicly asking questions or raising problems (e.g., integrators face retaliation from a manufacturer partner, employees can get in trouble with their company, end users are frequently harassed by sales people). This way, sensitive issues can be raised without the member being worried.
While some fear misuse, we can handle this. Some worry that people can use this as a cover to promote their products or attack their competitors. However, we will check each stealth post for any such issues. If there are, we will reach out to the member and ask them to modify or delete the comment. However, we will never reveal the name of the person publicly.
Embedding Pictures and Links
LinkedIn, as well as many forums, restrict formatting of user’s posts. By contrast, IPVM forums allow embedding images, videos and links. For instance, if a member has a problem with a camera, they can share the image directly in their comment. Likewise, we can embed images and videos in line to improve our response.
Up Next – Searching
Another major limitation of LinkedIn discussions is that they are in closed area that neither search engines nor even us could access without manually logging in. By contrast, IPVM discussions are accessible directly on the public Internet (with detailed comments members only). In February, we will add this to IPVM search making it even easier to find any information on a topic of interest, whether it is in a post or discussion.
Helping Members Still #1
All of these improvements focus on making it easier for members to participate so we can better help you. We are excited about how fast and strong discussions have already taken off in the first 3 week beta period.
Start a discussion. Leave a comment. Read on. See for yourself, go to IPVM discussions now.
Most Recent Industry Reports
7 Quizzes - Test Your Co-Workers on Apr 14, 2014
A major new offering, now IPVM members can take a series of 7 quizzes, plus they can assign them to their co-workers who are also IPVM members. Make sure you truly are on top of surveillance ...
Super Low Lux Minidome Tested on Apr 10, 2014
'Super' low light cameras have become increasingly common in box and full size cameras. However, no one we know has offered them in a minidome, the most common form factor for many users, valu...
Testing 'Megapixel' Analog Camera on Mar 26, 2014
Megapixel analog sounds like a contradiction in terms. 'Analog' by definition, or at least in common use, is constrained by 60+ year old NTSC / PAL specifications and cannot be 'megapixel.' Howeve...
Ranking 95 Surveillance Manufacturers Interest on Mar 24, 2014
IPVM has ranked interest levels in 95 surveillance manufacturers from most to least. These are the companies covered: Over 400 IPVM members selected which of these companies they were interested...
2014 Surveillance Test Results Guide Released on Mar 19, 2014
Inside, get the 50 page IPVM 2014 Surveillance Test Results Guide and register for the 1 hour live webinar. In the past year, IPVM has spent thousands of hours conducting over 75 tests, representi...
Testing Pelco SureVision 2.0 on Mar 17, 2014
Pelco's new SureVision 2.0 line promises superior low light and wide dynamic range capabilities, claiming "industry-leading image quality in the most difficult lighting conditions." But does it del...
IPVM Site Improvements Directory on Mar 15, 2014
IPVM continuously develops new features and improvements. This document will serve as a directory of those, like 'release notes' but with more color and commentary. 2014 Site Improvements Added N...
Shootout: Megapixel vs Analog Cameras on Mar 12, 2014
How much does resolution really make a difference? For those purchasing budget or entry level systems, what, if any gain, does one get for higher resolution? In this test report, we did head to he...
Announcing News Monitoring Service on Mar 11, 2014
Now get weekly alerts on 110+ security companies, including new information from their websites as well as articles and discussions on them. This is the most powerful way to stay informed on the co...
License Plate Capture Shootout 2014 on Mar 10, 2014
What should you be using to capture license plates consistently? We tested 3 major types of cameras head to head to see the tradeoffs: Super Low Light cameras: Day / night MP cameras with advan...