The Definitive Guide to PPFby John Honovich, IPVM posted on Nov 04, 2012 About John Contact John
The most advanced yet most dangerous way to specify surveillance is pixels per foot (PPF, aka pixels per meter, PPM or pixel density). As much as it can help, it can make matters far worse, leading to overconfidence and poor performance.
PPF Established Metric
Yet PPF has become a critical established metric in the surveillance industry:
- Broad camera manufacturer support: Most of the major vendors advocate the use of this metric.
- Common A&E specifications: Architects and engineers who plan large projects regularly use PPF as the basis for their designs and surveillance plans.
- Need for Something: With so many resolution options today, the old metrics for percentage of screen covered make no sense. PPF has filled this void.
The Goal of PPF
PPF is a single metric (e.g., 10, 50, 90, etc.) that when specified should deliver a specific level of quality. For example, the parking lot camera must deliver 50ppf. Instead of guessing or just specifying more resolution, using this metric should enable selection of the ‘right’ resolution for the scene. The final image, following the PPF metric, will then deliver a predictable level of quality.
Alas, PPF suffers from many problems that are nearly never addressed:
- Assumes even lighting and ignores the impact of bright sunlight
- Assumes day time lighting and ignores the impact of night time / low light viewing
- Disregards differences in lenses and compression
- Disregards that image quality needs are subjective and debatable
- Fails to specify related and critical metrics to complement PPF
Despite this, PPF does have value for estimation and planning. It just cannot be used blindly or simplistically. Inside the PRO Member’s section, we explain:
- How to calculate PPF
- How to recognize PPF limitations and make adjustments
- How to best use PPF productively
Most Recent Industry Reports
Best Manufacturer Support 2014 on Jul 28, 2014
Integrators told us who the best and worst manufacturers are at providing customer support were. The companies that stood out included Arecont Vision, Avigilon, Axis, Exacq, Genetec, Hikvision, Le...
Testing Genetec Security Center on Jul 23, 2014
This is IPVM's first in a series of all new, in-depth test reports on video management software. We start with Genetec's Security Center. Here's a 50 second video overview: Inside this report a...
Panasonic Series 6 IP Cameras Tested on Jul 21, 2014
Can Panasonic make a comeback? One of the early entrants in IP cameras, Panasonic has been slipping, dues to faster and more aggressive competitors. Now, Panasonic has released a sixth generation...
Favorite Access Control Software 2014 on Jul 16, 2014
What are the favorite access control software platforms? Is it the elder incumbents like Honeywell, Lenel and Software House? Or can newer providers like Brivo, Genetec or S2 make a dent? Just lik...
Testing Samsung vs Google/Dropcam on Jul 14, 2014
Samsung is charging hard into IP cameras. Last year, they attacked the professional market with their WiseNet III launch. Now, they are going after the consumer / residential market with their "Sm...
Summer 2014 IP Camera Course on Jul 10, 2014
Registration is CLOSED. Next course will start in October. IPVM's industry leading IP camera course provides certification and enables you to master the key concepts, drivers and factors in select...
Testing the Smallest HD Cameras on Jul 09, 2014
Miniature HD IP cameras are a growing trend. It started with cameras that had small 'heads' but large 'base' units. Increasingly, though, the bases are shrinking. Recently, we even found one withou...
IP Camera Statistics 2014 on Jul 07, 2014
All IPVM members can download our new IP Camera Statistics 2014 report. Here's what's inside the 54 page guide: This is a companion report to Favorite IP Cameras 2014, Worst IP Cameras ...
Testing Varifocal Minidome (IQeye) on Jul 02, 2014
Minidomes are increasing in popularity, as IPVM statistics show. However, the most common objection to using minidomes is the lack of varifocal lenses. In this report, we tested the IQinVision&nbs...