Are You Too Stupid to Buy IP Cameras?

by John Honovich, IPVM posted on Jan 12, 2009 About John Contact John

Why are 4 out of 5 of you still not choosing IP cameras? The IP video vendors keep trying to educate you. Is it that you are clearly that stupid to not get it? Or do you just shut it out?

A Serious Issue

I believe a fundamental cultural and strategic issue is at the heart of this discussion. I think the IP Video industry has fundamentally misinterpreted the real issues involved - it's the lack of business value of IP video, not the transaction cost of getting educated.

The Importance of Education

Anywhere you go in the industry you hear talk about the importance of education. The lack of education is holding IP back. We need to get more people trained. Once they are trained, they will move to IP. Nothing is holding back IP except for awareness.

What They Mean is - You are an Idiot

I talk to executives all the time and there is a clear negative undercurrent to this seemingly positive message.  New entrants, especially IT people, tend to think that  security people are idiots - stupid, lazy people that neither have intelligence nor drive to understand new and better technologies.  I am not saying everyone does and I am not here to call people out. However, I am sure this a very widespread belief that impacts the strategy and marketing of IP video.

A Dangerous Cop-Out

I see two major dangers here:

  • IP video vendors build flawed strategies based on an assumption that makes them feel better but misses the real customer problem.
  • Traditional end users feel mistreated and marginalized, creating more cultural and political problems in migrating to IP video.

The Business Barriers for IP Video

When business make decisions, there are two fundamental economic components: (1) transaction costs and (2) direct costs.  If you are a PC user and you buy a Mac, the cost of the Mac is a direct cost while the cost to learn how to use a Mac is the transaction cost.

Education is a transaction cost. People need to learn about the value and operations of IP Video before buying and deploying it.

Some decisions will not be made when the direct costs are justifiable but the transaction costs are too high. This is when reducing transaction costs (like education) make sense.

The problem is the direct costs of IP are still too high to justify for the majority of users. It does not matter how much you educate them, most rationale buyers cannot make the business case for IP video - period.  

As such, education may be nice but it is not the key to success. We have debated this point extensively both in the IP camera problem discussion and the IP video advantages and disadvantages review. Read those threads for background information.

The Future

The easy victory and dominance of IT is not happening. Even before the global recession, it was clear that convergence was moving at a slower than projected rate. Now, it will take even longer.
Inside the Pro Section

In the premium section, I will recommend a course of action for IP video companies to follow to break through the real business barriers they have including:

  • How to expanding into markets that are currently poor fits for IP video
  • How to overcome barriers for existing deployments
  • How to optimize product fit for the broader market
Offerings from Axis, Mobotix, IQinVision, OnSSI and Nuuo will be discussed.


Options





Most Recent Industry Reports

30 vs 60 FPS Shootout on May 22, 2013
30 frames per second used to be the maximum practical limit for surveillance cameras. Now, it is becoming increasingly common for IP cameras to support double that, 60 frames per second. (For backg...

#1 IP Camera Benefit on May 20, 2013
Megapixel was, far and away, the number #1 cited benefit in going to IP cameras / video. We asked over 100 integrators to name the "3 biggest reasons" they found, allowing them to name whatever the...

Testing VSaaS / Dropcam HD on May 15, 2013
Dropcam is pretty clearly the strongest upstart in the VSaaS market. While Axis has pushed their hosted service offering for years, it is beset by poor ROI and weak performance. There are dozens of...

Testing Panoramic Cameras Outdoors on May 13, 2013
Outdoors, PTZs tend to be a favorite for covering large open areas but they only see whatever they are currently pointed at. Panoramics are an emerging alternative but how well do they perform and ...

Testing CarCam on May 08, 2013
Dash cams are getting a lot of attention for the amazing video they inadvertently capture, like a crashing 747 in Afghanistan, a meteor explosion, Russian crazy fights and accidents, etc. Moreov...

#1 IP Camera Problem on May 07, 2013
Cost was, far and away, the number #1 cited problem in going to IP cameras / video. We asked over 100 integrators to name the "3 biggest problems / barriers" they found, allowing them to name whate...

Testing Covert Cameras on May 02, 2013
Covert cameras are regularly referenced in TV shows and undercover reporting. We ordered two of the most frequently sold covert cameras on Amazon - a Car Key cam and a PenCam, as shown below: We...

Stop The Lying and Crazy Claims on Apr 29, 2013
The last few weeks have been an embarrassment for surveillance, with a small number of companies turning this into a despicable marketing campaign perpetuating lies and crazy myths about what surve...

Panoramic Camera Shootout on Apr 22, 2013
Panoramic cameras are one of the hottest growing markets within surveillance. The combination of multi-megapixel resolution and super wide FoVs claims to deliver greater coverage than conventional ...

Top Trends in Access Control on Apr 17, 2013
All of a sudden, Access Control has momentum? After a long period of apparent stagnation and staleness, new technologies and devoted marketing campaigns have breathed life into the segment. Indeed,...